Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:11:11.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conducting sensitive social science research about on-farm animal welfare incidents: challenges and approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

C Devitt ,
P Kelly ,
M Blake ,
A Hanlon  and
SJ More
C Devitt*
Affiliation:
Private Consultant, Glendalough, Co Wicklow, The Republic of Ireland
P Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, The Republic of Ireland
M Blake
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, The Republic of Ireland
A Hanlon
Affiliation:
UCD School for Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, The Republic of Ireland
SJ More
Affiliation:
Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, The Republic of Ireland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The social sciences can help provide a deeper understanding of human-farm animal relations. However, social science research exploring problematic human-farm animal interactions can be of a sensitive nature. Studies that carry risks for participants and the researcher are known methodologically as sensitive research. However, there is little discussion in the animal welfare sciences on how best to conduct research of this nature on animal owners, despite recommendations being made for more interdisciplinary collaboration between the animal welfare sciences and social sciences. Drawing on social science research conducted in 2012 on the human element of on-farm animal welfare incidents in the Republic of Ireland, this short communication presents a case study of the sensitivities and challenges involved in carrying out social science research related to farm animal welfare. This communication details the steps involved in recruiting participants, the methodological challenges encountered, and the approaches used to overcome these challenges. Our experience suggests that when conducting socially sensitive research, careful consideration needs to be applied to the recruitment process, and the study design must aim to minimise the potential risks for all involved. Professionals in the field, such as veterinarians, can play an important role in outlining some of the implications involved, and in overcoming research challenges. Understanding the challenges to this form of research will help to maximise research potential.

Keywords

animal welfarehuman-farm animal relationsparticipant recruitmentsensitive researchsocial sciencethe Republic of Ireland
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , August 2016 , pp. 319 - 323
Copyright
© 2016 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Andrade, S and Anneberg, I 2014 Farmers under Pressure. Analysis of the Social Conditions of Cases of Animal Neglect. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Ethics 27: 103–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9456-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R and Flint, J 2001 Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Snowball 238 research strategies. Social Research Update 33: 1–4Google Scholar
Brannen, J 1988 Research note. The study of sensitive subjects. The Sociological Review 36(3): 552–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1988.tb02929.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronner, A, Hénaux, V, Fortané, N, Hendrikx, P and Calavas, D 2014 Why do farmers and veterinarians not report all bovine abortions, as requested by the clinical brucellosis surveil-lance system in France? BMC Veterinary Research 10: 93–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carenzi, C and Verga, M 2009 Animal welfare: review of the scientific concept and definition. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8:21–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, A, Feeney, M and Macken-Walsh, A 2012 Pain and dis-tress in rural Ireland; A qualitative study of suicidal behaviour among men in rural areas. University College Dublin and Teagasc, Dublin, The Republic of IrelandGoogle Scholar
Devitt, C, Kelly, P, Blake, M, Hanlon, A and More, SJ 2013 Veterinarian challenges to providing a multi-agency response to farm animal welfare problems in Ireland: responding to the human factor. Revue Scientifique et Technique 32(3): 657–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.32.2.2225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devitt, C, Kelly, P, Blake, M, Hanlon, A and More, SJ 2014 Dilemmas experienced by government veterinarians when responding professionally to farm animal welfare incidents in Ireland. Veterinary Record Open 1: e000003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vropen-2013-000003Google ScholarPubMed
Devitt, C, Kelly, P, Blake, M, Hanlon, A and More, SJ 2015 An investigation into the human element of on-farm animal welfare incidents in Ireland. Sociologia Ruralis 55: 400–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soru.12069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson-Swift, V, James, E, Kippen, S and Liamputtong, P 2007 Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research 7: 327–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794107078515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson-Swift, V, James, E and Liamputtong, P 2008a Undertaking Sensitive Research in the Health and Social Sciences: Managing Boundaries, Emotions and Risks. Cambridge University Press: London, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson-Swift, V, James, E and Liamputtong, P 2008b Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: Issues and strategies. Qualitative Health Research 18(1): 133–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732307309007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, PH and Coleman, GJ 2010 Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals, Second Edition. CAB International: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Coleman, GJ, Barnett, JL and Borg, S 2000 Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 78: 2821–2831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, B and Clarke, J 2003 Collecting sensitive data: the impact on researchers. Qualitative Health Research 13: 421–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732302250340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauppinen, T, Vesala, KM and Valros, A 2012 Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters. Livestock Science 143: 142–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielland, C, Skjerve, E, ⊘sterås, O and Zanella, J 2010 Dairy farmer attitudes and empathy toward animals are associated with animal welfare indicators. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 2998–3006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, V, Coleman, G, Gunnarsson, S, Appleby, MC and Karkinen, K 2006 Animal welfare science: working at the interface between the natural and social sciences. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 97: 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, G 1996 The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
McCosker, H, Barnard, A and Gerber, R 2001 Undertaking sensitive research: Issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs of all participants. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2(1), Article 22: 1–14Google Scholar
Morrissey, K, Daly, A, Clarke, G, Ballas, D and O’Donoghue, C 2009 An examination of psychiatric inpatient admissions in rural Ireland. Teagasc REDP Working Paper Series 09-WP-RE-10. http://www.teagasc.ie/rural-economy/downloads/workingpa-pers/09WP10.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sieber, J and Stanley, B 1988 Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research. American Psychologist 42: 49–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar