Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:36:52.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the Behaviour of Broiler Chickens in Indoor and Free-Range Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C A Weeks ,
C J Nicol ,
C M Sherwin  and
S C Kestin
C A Weeks*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS 18 7DU, UK
C J Nicol
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS 18 7DU, UK
C M Sherwin
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS 18 7DU, UK
S C Kestin
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS 18 7DU, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The behaviour of broilers reared at pasture from 4 to 12 weeks of age on a low density diet supplied either indoors or outdoors, was compared with that of birds reared inside on deep litter. This single study found few differences in behaviour. Activity levels of birds outside were initially greater, but from six weeks of age lying increased to comparable levels in all groups.

Surprisingly little use was made of the extra space and facilities such as perches at pasture. It is proposed that the main reason for this was leg weakness as 80 per cent of the birds had a detectable gait abnormality at seven weeks of age. There was no evidence of reduced motivation to extend the behavioural repertoire, as, for example, ground pecking remained at significantly higher levels in the outdoor groups because it could also be performed from a lying posture.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourbroiler chickensfree-rangeleg weakness
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , August 1994 , pp. 179 - 192
Copyright
© 1994 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Appleby, M C, Duncan, IJH and McRae, H E 1988 Perching and floor laying by domestic hens: experimental results and their commercial application. British Poultry Science 29: 351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokhuis, H J 1984 Rest in poultry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12: 289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashman, P J, Nicol, C J and Jones, R B 1989 Effects of transportation on the tonic immobility fear reactions of broilers. British Poultry Science 30: 211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1989 Time budgets in Red Junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in the domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24: 77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, M 1955 A statistical formula to quantify the ‘spread of participation’ in a group discussion. Speech Monographs 22: 28–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1988 Report on Research Priorities for Animal Welfare. FAWC: Surbiton, SurreyGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1992 Report on the Welfare of Broiler Chickens. FAWC: Surbiton, SurreyGoogle Scholar
Jones, R B 1986 The tonic immobility reaction of the domestic fowl: a review. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 42: 82–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, L J, Hughes, B O and Dun, P 1988 Performance of free range laying hens in a polythene house and their behaviour on range. Farm Buildings Progress 94: 21–28Google Scholar
Kestin, S C, Knowles, T G, Tinch, A E and Gregory, N G 1992 Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Veterinary Record 131: 190–194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madelin, T M and Wathes, C M 1989 Air hygiene in a broiler house: comparison of deep litter with raised netting floors. British Poultry Science 30: 23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L B and Preston, A P 1988 Time-budgeting in meat chickens grown commercially. British Poultry Science 29: 571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R C and Hall, J W 1988 Space utilisation by broiler chickens in floor pens. In J Unshelm, G Van Putten, K Zeeb and I Ekesbo (eds) Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals, Skara pp 305–309. Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft (KTBL): DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R C, Hunt, J R and Gardiner, E E 1988 Influence of light intensity on behaviour and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 67: 1020–1025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, A P, Pamment, P, McBride, G and Foenander, F 1983 Some activity patterns of meat chickens. Fifth Australian Poultry and Stock Feed Convention (Adelaide, September) pp 203–207Google Scholar
Shepherdson, D J, Carlstead, K, Mellen, J D and Seidenstricker, J 1993 The influence of food presentation on the behavior of small cats in confined environments. Zoo Biology 12: 203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, P B 1984 The role of behaviour in poultry production: a review of research. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 299–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, N R and Rohlf, F J 1981 Biometry, 2nd edition. W H Freeman & Co: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, P 1989 Broiler selection and welfare. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, Tours pp 45–48. World Poultry Science Association: ToursGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, DGM, Duncan, I J H and Savory, C J 1978 Observations on the social behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild. Biology of Behaviour 3: 193–205Google Scholar