Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:41:49.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cat Housing in Rescue Shelters: A Welfare Comparison Between Communal and Discrete-Unit Housing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

D S Ottway  and
D M Hawkins
D S Ottway*
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Research Centre, Anglia Polytechnic University
D M Hawkins
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Research Centre, Anglia Polytechnic University
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Polytechnic University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cats living long-term (over one month) in shelters were assessed for behavioural indicators of stress, using a stress scoring method in combination with behavioural observation. It is hypothesised that because of the inappropriate social grouping of unrelated adult cats and group instability, communal housing creates more stress than discrete-unit housing. Seventy-two cats were observed: 36 were housed communally with unfamiliar conspecifics, and 36 were housed in discrete units, either alone or with other previously familiar conspecifics. The mean stress score was greater in communal housing than in discrete-unit housing. Stress scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating no stress experienced, and 7 indicating extreme stress. Individual scores showed that cats in discrete units, in comparison to those in communal housing, gained a significantly higher percentage of observations in the score 2 category, indicating that no stress was being experienced. Cats in communal housing gained a significantly higher percentage in the score 4 category (stressed). Score 5 was found exclusively in communal housing, but only in 2% of instances. Extreme stress was not found in cats housed under either condition. Cats in the different types of housing differed in their frequencies of hiding, play, sleeping/resting in close contact with one another, and agonistic behaviour. There was no difference between housing types in frequency of eating, drinking, grooming, and toilet use. In this study, cats housed communally experienced moderately higher levels of stress than cats housed in discrete units. Further research is recommended to determine the effect on stress levels of longer shelter residence time and of changes in group size and/or density.

Keywords

animal welfarecatcommunal vs discrete unit housinggroup instabilityrescue shelterstress
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 2003 , pp. 173 - 189
Copyright
© 2003 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Apps, P J 1986 Home ranges of feral cats on Dassen Island. Journal of Mammology 67: 199–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J W S 1992 The Behaviour of the Domestic Cat. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Broom, D M 1986 Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal 142: 524–526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, D M 1988 The scientific assessment of welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, D M and Johnson, K G 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Brown, J L and Stawn, W 1993 Behavioural and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, L K 1979 Feeding ecology and social organisation of wildcats (Felis silvestris) and domestic cats (Felis catus) in Scotland. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen, UKGoogle Scholar
Dards, J L 1983 The behaviour of dockyard cats: interactions of adult males. Applied Animal Ethology 10: 133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagen, R 1978 Population structure and social behaviour in the domestic cat. Carnivore Genetics Newsletter 3: 276–281Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, B M and Karl, B J 1986 Home range of feral house cats (Felis catus L.) in forests of the Orongorongo Valley, Wellington, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 9: 71–81Google Scholar
Hart, B L and Barrett, R E 1973 Effects of castration on fighting, roaming and urine spraying in adult male cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 163: 290–292Google Scholar
Kerby, G 1987 The social organisation of farm cats (Felis catus). DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M R and Turner, D C 1997 Stress and adaptation of cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed singly, in pairs and in groups in boarding catteries. Animal Welfare 6: 243–254Google Scholar
Kessler, M R and Turner, D C 1999a Socialisation and stress in cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed singly and in groups in animal shelters. Animal Welfare 8: 15–26Google Scholar
Kessler, M R and Turner, D C 1999b Effects of density and cage size on stress in domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed in animal shelters and boarding catteries. Animal Welfare 8: 259–267Google Scholar
Langham, N P E 1992 Feral cats on New Zealand farmland. II: Seasonal activity. Wildlife Research 19: 707–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langham, N P E and Porter, RER 1991 Feral cats on New Zealand farmland. I: Home range. Wildlife Research 18: 741–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laundre, J 1977 The daytime behaviour of domestic cats in a free-roaming population. Animal Behaviour 25: 990–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberg, O 1980 Spacing patterns in a population of rural free-roaming domestic cats. Oikos 35: 336–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberg, O, Sandell, M, Pontier, D and Natoli, E 2000 Density, spatial organisation and reproductive tactics in the domestic cat and other felids. In: Turner, D C and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour, Edn 2 pp 119–147. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, D W and Apps, P J 1978 The social behaviour of a group of semi-dependent farm cats (Felis catus): a progress report. Carnivore Genetics Newsletter 3: 256–258Google Scholar
Macdonald, D W, Yamaguchi, N and Kerby, G 2000 Group living in the domestic cat: its socio-biology and epidemiology. In: Turner, D C and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour, Edn 2 pp 95–118. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1993 Measuring Behaviour, Edn 2. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Caro, T M 1985 On the function of play and its role in behavioural development. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 15: 59–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, S 1992 Temperament and welfare of caged cats. DPhil Thesis, University of Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
McCune, S 1994 Caged cats: avoiding problems and providing solutions. Newsletter of the Companion Animal Study Group, No 7Google Scholar
Mendl, M and Newberry, R C 1997 Social conditions. In: Appleby, M C and Hughes, B O (eds) Animal Welfare pp 191–203. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Mertens, C and Schar, R 1988 Practical aspects of research on cats. In: Turner, D C and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour pp 179–190. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Natoli, E 1985 Spacing pattern in a colony of urban stray cats (Felis catus L.) in the historic centre of Rome. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 14: 289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natoli, E and de Vito, E 1991 Agonistic behaviour, dominance rank and copulatory success in a large multimale feral cat colony in central Rome. Animal Behaviour 42: 227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, E C 1980 Felis catus population densities in an urban area. Carnivore Genetics Newsletter 4: 72–80Google Scholar
Petherick, J C and Rushen, J 1997 Behavioural restriction. In: Appleby, M C and Hughes, B O (eds) Animal Welfare pp 89–105. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Siegel S and Castellan N J Jr 1988 Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, Edn 2. McGraw-Hill International Editions: SingaporeGoogle Scholar
Smith, D F, Durman, K J, Roy, D B and Bradshaw, J W 1990 Behavioural aspects of the welfare of rescued cats. The Journal of the Feline Advisory Bureau 31: 25–28Google Scholar
SPSS 1993 SPSS for Windows: Base System User Guide, Release 6.0. SPSS Inc: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Turner, D and Mertens, C 1986 Home range size, overlap and exploitation in domestic farm cats (Felis catus). Behaviour 99: 22–45Google Scholar
UK Cat Behaviour Working Group 1995 An ethogram for behavioural studies of the domestic cat (Felis catus). UFAW Animal Welfare Research Report 8. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, UKGoogle Scholar
Wolski, T R 1982 Social behaviour of the cat. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 12: 693–706CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed