Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:52:51.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body condition score as an indicator of ewe survival under extensive conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C Morgan-Davies ,
A Waterhouse ,
ML Pollock  and
JM Milner
C Morgan-Davies*
Affiliation:
SAC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, Scotland, UK
A Waterhouse
Affiliation:
SAC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, Scotland, UK
ML Pollock
Affiliation:
SAC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, Scotland, UK
JM Milner
Affiliation:
Hedmark University College, Forestry & Wildlife Management Dept, Evenstad, N-2480 Koppang, Norway
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Survival and mortality of extensive hill ewes are important commercial factors and valuable indicators of welfare, but difficult to study. Body condition scoring is a tried-and-tested management and monitoring tool which has been defined as a good predictor of fitness in ewes and is easily measured under hill farm conditions. This paper presents the results of a study on ewe survival rates in hill conditions in Scotland. Ewe performance and survival rates were measured in two contrasting hill flocks over a five-year period. Statistical analysis showed that mid-pregnancy body condition score was the most reliable indicator of subsequent ewe survival, followed closely by age of the ewe and environmental and management conditions. This study confirms that there are considerable welfare issues related to hill flocks and that improved winter nutritional management is a key component to good welfare and productivity. It also reinforces the view that body condition score is a good quantitative predictor of animal welfare and that poor mid-winter score indicates high risk of mortality, both at the flock and individual ewe level.

Keywords

animal welfarebody condition scoringextensive conditionsmortalitysheepsurvival
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 71 - 77
Copyright
© 2008 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Atkins, KD 1986 A genetic analysis of the components of lifetime productivity in Scottish Blackface sheep. Animal Production 43: 405–419Google Scholar
Azzarini, M, Pison, P and Cardellino, RA 1998 Management of ewes lambing twins under extensive conditions. Producción Ovina 11: 41–49Google Scholar
Defra 2000 Condition scoring of sheep, pb1875. Defra publications: London, UK (www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfarefarmed/sheep/pb1875/sheeptoc.htm)Google Scholar
Defra 2002 Code of recommendation for the welfare of livestock: sheep. Defra publications: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fogarty, NM, McGuirk, BJ and Nicholls, PJ 1976 Reproductive performances of Border Leicester ewes. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 11: 117–120Google Scholar
FAWC 1994 Report on the welfare of sheep: PB1755. MAFF: London, UKGoogle Scholar
GenStat 2005 Windows 8th Edition. VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UKGoogle Scholar
Goddard, P, Waterhouse, T, Dwyer, C and Stott, A 2006 The perception of welfare of sheep in extensive systems. Small Ruminant Research 62: 215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, RG, Doney, JM and Russel, AJF 1969 Fertility in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by nutrition and body condition at mating. Journal of Agricultural Science 73: 289–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, BC 1961 Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32: 19–21Google Scholar
Kearney, K 1985 Some observations on parasitic infections in farm animals in Irish hills. In: O'Toole, MA (ed) Hill Land Symposium pp 355–363. 9-12 October 1984, Galway, Irish Republic: An Foras Talúntais: Co Mayo, Irish RepublicGoogle Scholar
Kelly, RW, Speijers, EJ, Ralph, IG and Newnham, JP 1992 Lambing performances and wool production of maiden and adult Merino ewes fed different amounts of lupin seeds in mid-pregnancy. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43: 339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambe, NR, Young, MJ, McLean, KA, Conington, J and SimmG, 2003a Prediction of total body tissue weights in Scottish Blackface ewes using computed tomography scanning. Animal Science 76: 191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambe, NR, Young, MJ, Brotherstone, S, Kvame, T, Conington, J, Kolstad, K and Simm, G 2003b Body composition changes in Scottish Blackface ewes during one annual production cycle. Animal Science 76: 211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, C 2003 Management of breeding ewes on pregnancy scanning data. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 51: 142–143Google Scholar
Lawrence, AB and Appleby, MC 1996 Welfare of extensively farmed animals: principles and practice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullagh, P and Nelder, JA 1989 Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission 1983 Feeding the ewe. MLC Sheep Improvement Services: Milton Keynes, UKGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, GBB 2005 Sustainable Control of Parasitic Gastroenteritis in Sheep in Scotland: Technical Note 577. SAC: Edinburgh, Scotland, UKGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Davies, C, Waterhouse, A, Milne, CE and Stott, AW 2006 Farmers' opinions on welfare, health and production practices in extensive hill sheep flocks in Great Britain. Livestock Science 104: 268–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Toole, MA 1983 Effects of supplementary feeding of hill ewes in late pregnancy and early lactation on ewe and lamb performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 22: 127–139Google Scholar
Parker, M and Waterhouse, A 1986 The effects of improved management based on ultrasound scanning of Scottish Blackface ewes from a high hill flock. Animal Production 42: 449 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Pollott, GE and Kilkenny, JB 1976 A note on the use of condition scoring in commercial sheep flocks. Animal Production 23: 261–264Google Scholar
Russel, AJF 1984 Body condition scoringofsheep.In Practice 6: 91–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, AJF, Doney, JM and Gunn, RG 1969 Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science 72: 451–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAC 2006 Farm Management Handbook 2006/07. SAC publications: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Scott, PR 2005 The potential for improving disease control and welfare standards in UK flocks using veterinary flock health plans. Proceedings of the Sheep Veterinary Society 29: 19–22Google Scholar
SEERAD 2002 Codes of recommendations for the welfare of livestock: Sheep. Scottish Executive: Edinburgh, Scotland, UKGoogle Scholar
Warren, JT and Mysterud, I 1995 Mortality of domestic sheep in free-ranging flocks in southeastern Norway. Journal of Animal Science 73: 1012–1018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterhouse, A, Roger, LC and Ashworth, SA 1992 Reducing lamb mortality in hill sheep. In: Varley, MA, Williams, PEV and Lawrence, TLJ (eds) Neonatal Survival and Growth pp 179–181. Occasional Publication No 15, British Society of Animal Production: Edinburgh, Scotland, UKGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, A 1996 Animal welfare and sustainability of production under extensive conditions – A European perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, AJF 2003 Assessment of animal welfare at farm and group level: introduction and overview. Animal Welfare 12: 429–433Google Scholar
Young, MJ, Simm, G, Glasbey, CA and Merrel, B 2002 Using CT scanning to improve carcass form in sheep. In: INRA, CIRAD (eds) 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production pp 18. 19-23 August 2002, Montpellier. INRA: Castanet-Tolosan, FranceGoogle Scholar