Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:32:09.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural Observations of Peri-Parturient Sows and the Development of Alternative Farrowing Accommodation: A Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

D S Arey
D S Arey*
Affiliation:
Animal and Feed Technology Department, SAC, Craibstone, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9YA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A number of alternative farrowing systems have recently been developed, some of which have been more successful at improving welfare and productivity than others. It is argued that for a system to be successful it should meet with the behavioural requirements of the sow at this time. A number of studies have been carried out to observe the natural behaviour patterns of the peri-parturient sow in a wide range of environmental conditions. These studies have shown that during each phase of peri-parturient behaviour there are a number of key environmental features and conditions which are important to the sow. These include the social environment, shelter, nesting material and offspring interaction. This information can be useful in the design of farrowing systems. A review of the literature indicated that the more these conditions are met, the more readily the sow can adapt to the system, leading to improvements in maternal behaviour and piglet production.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourfarrowing sowhousingpreference
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , August 1997 , pp. 217 - 229
Copyright
© 1997 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Algers, B 1991 Group housing farrowing sows - health aspects of a new system. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress on Animal Hygiene pp 851–857. Germany Veterinary Medical Society: GermanyGoogle Scholar
Algers, B and Jensen, P 1990 Thermal microclimate in winter farrowing nests of free-ranging domestic pigs. Livestock Production Science 25: 177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arey, D S 1992 Straw and food as reinforcers for prepartal sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arey, D S 1993 The welfare of pigs in confined and non-confined farrowing systems. Pig News and Information 14: 81N–84NGoogle Scholar
Arey, D S 1994 The family system for pigs: developments at Aberdeen. Farm Building Progress 116: 8–12Google Scholar
Arey, D S 1995 The family system for pigs - from pig park to production system. Pig News and Information 16: 123N–126NGoogle Scholar
Arey, D S, Petchey, A M and Fowler, V R 1991 The preparturient behaviour of sows in enriched pens and the effect of pre-formed nests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arey, D S, Petchey, A M and Fowler, V R 1992a The peri-parturient behaviour of sows housed in pairs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 49–59Google Scholar
Arey, D S, Petchey, A M and Fowler, V R 1992b The effect of straw on farrowing site choice and nest building in sows. Animal Production 54: 129–134Google Scholar
Arey, D S and Sancha, E S 1996 Behaviour and productivity of sows and piglets in a family system and in farrowing crates. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 50: 135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M R 1982a The nesting behaviour of sows and its disturbance by confinement at farrowing. In: Bessei, W (ed) Disturbed Behaviour in Farm Animals pp 101–114. Eugen Ulmer: Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M R 1982b Ethology in environmental design for animal production. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M R 1991 The ‘Freedom’ farrowing system. Farm Building Progress 104: 9–15Google Scholar
Baxter, S H 1984 Intensive Pig Production: Environmental Management and Design. Granada: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Bøe, K 1991 The process of weaning pigs: when the sow decides. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøe, K 1993 Maternal behaviour of lactating sows in a loose-housing system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøe, K 1994 Variation in maternal behaviour and production of sows in integrated loose housing systems in Norway. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buré, R G and Houwers, H W J 1989 Automation in group housing in sows. In: Dodd, V A and Grace, P A (eds) Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Agricultural Engineering pp 827–830. Institute of Agricultural Engineering (IMAG): Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Burê, R G and Houwers, H W J 1993 Behaviour and production of sows in free-access farrowing quarters. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Applied Ethology in Livestock pp 167–176. KTBL- Schift: Freiburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Buss, K D 1972 A Comparison of Nest Building Behaviour with the Wild pig and the Domestic pig. Inaugural thesis (translation), Hansen Veterinary College, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Castren, H, Algers, B, Passille, A M de, Rushen, R and Uvnas-Moberg, K 1993 Progesterone, prolactin, oxytocin and somatostatin in relation to nest building in sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, E R Jr, Kornegay, E T and Bonnette, E D 1987 The effects of two confinement systems on the performance of nursing sows and their litters. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, R J 1995 The Effect of Farrowing Pen Design on Sow Preference and Nest Building Behaviour. MSc Thesis, University of Aberdeen, UKGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G M and van Amerongen, G 1991 The effects of modifying the farrowing environment on sow behaviour and survival and growth of piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G M, Barnett, J L, Hodge, F M, Smith, J A and McCalIum, T H 1991 The welfare of pigs in two farrowing/lactation environments: Cortisol responses of sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G M, Schirmer, B N, McCalIum, T H, Smith, J A and Butler, K L 1993 The effects of providing sawdust to pre-parturient sows in farrowing crates on sow behaviour the duration of parturition and the occurrence of intra-partum stillborn piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 301–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G M, Simpson, G J and Hemsworth, P H 1996 The effects of the gestation and farrowing environments on sow and piglet behaviour and piglet survival and growth in early lactation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46: 175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G M and Smith, J A 1992 Effects of accommodation type and straw bedding around parturition and during lactation on the behaviour of primiparous sows and survival and growth of piglets to weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G M, Smith, J A, Hodge, F M and Hemsworth, P H 1994 The behaviour of primiparous sows around farrowing in response to restraint and straw bedding. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebner, J 1993 Group-housing of Lactating Sows. Studies on Health, Behaviour and Nest Temperature. MSc Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S A and Fraser, D 1996 Options for housing the sow and litter. Animal Science 62: 634–635 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Edwards, S A and Furniss, S J 1988 The effects of straw in crated farrowing systems on peripartal behaviour of sows and piglets. British Veterinary Journal 144: 139–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, P R 1993 A review of farrowing facilities in relation to the needs of the sow and her piglets and the aspirations of the caring stockperson. Pig Veterinary Journal 31: 124–142Google Scholar
Fisher, D M 1990 The application of electronic identification to groups of farrowing and lactating sows in straw bedded housing. In: Electronic Identification in Pig Production ρ 101. Royal Agricultural Society of England: Stoneleigh, UKGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D, Phillips, P A and Thompson, B K 1988 Initial test of a farrowing crate with inward-sloping sides. Livestock Production Science 20: 249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Götz, M and Troxler, J 1993 Farrowing and nursing in the group. In: Collins, E and Boon, C (eds) Livestock Environment IV pp 159–166. American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph, USAGoogle Scholar
Götz, M and Troxler, J 1995 Group housing of sows during farrowing and lactation. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 38: 1495–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, H B 1984 Behavior and ecology of wild and feral swine. Journal of Animal Science 58: 482–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundlach, H 1968 Brutfürsorge, brötpflege, verhaltensontogenese und tagesperiodik beim Europäischen Wildschwein (Sus scrofa). Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 25: 955–995Google ScholarPubMed
Gustaffson, B 1982 Effects of sow housing systems in practical pig production. Livestock Environment II Proceedings of the Second International Livestock Environment Symposium pp 380–391. American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph, USAGoogle Scholar
Hafez, E S E and Signoret, J P 1969 The behaviour of swine. In: Hafez, ESE (ed) The Behaviour of Domestic Animals pp 349–390. Baillière Tindall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Haskell, M J and Hutson, G D 1994 Factors affecting the choice of farrowing site in sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatet, G, Edwards, S A, Gall, K and Arey, D S 1994 Effect of three lactation systems on sow and piglet performance and behaviour. Animal Production 58: 475 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Head, A, English, P R, Roden, J A, McPherson, O and Xalabarder, A 1995 A comparison of single and group farrowing/lactation paddocks for first parity sows in an outdoor system. Animal Science 60: 563 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Heckt, W L, Widowski, T M, Curtis, S E and Gonyou, H W 1988 Prepartum behavior of gilts in three farrowing environments. Journal of Animal Science 66: 1378–1385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesse, D 1992 Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemässen Tierhaltung 1991. Internationale Arbeitstagung Angewandte Ethologie bei Nutztieren No 351 pp 199-208. KTBL-Schrift: Freiburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Higgins, M and Edwards, S A 1996 The effects on welfare and production of using individual or group paddocks for farrowing sows and litters in an outdoor system. Fourth International Livestock Farming Systems Symposium pC6 (Abstract). Danish Institute of Animal Science: Foulum, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Houwers, H W, Bure, R G and Koomans, P 1992 Behaviour of sows in a free-access farrowing section. Farm Building Progress 109: 9–11Google Scholar
Hunt, K and Petchey, A M 1989 Degree of enclosure preferred by sows around farrowing. Animal Production 48: 642 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Hurnik, J F 1985 A review of periparturient behaviour in swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 65: 777–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, G D 1992 A comparison of operant responding by farrowing sows for food and nest building materials. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, G D and Haskell, M J 1990 The behaviour of farrowing sows with free and operant access to an earth floor. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P 1986 Observations on the maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P 1988 Maternal behaviour and mother-young interactions during lactation in free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P 1989 Nest site choice and nest building of free-ranging domestic pigs due to farrow. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P 1993 Nest building in domestic sows: the role of external stimuli. Animal Behaviour 45: 351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P, Floren, K and Hobroh, B 1987 Periparturient changes in behaviour in free ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P and Récen, B 1989 When to wean - observations from free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P and Redbo, I 1987 Behaviour during nest leaving in free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P, Vestergaard, K and Algers, B 1993 Nestbuilding in free-ranging domestic sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, S G C, Wood-Gush, D G M, Moser, H and Whittemore, C T 1988 Enrichment of the production environment and the enhancement of welfare through the use of the Edinburgh Family Pen System of Pig Production. Research and Development in Agriculture 5: 171–186Google Scholar
Kilgour, R and Dalton, C 1984 Farrowing pens and behaviour. In: Livestock Behaviour: A Practical Guide pp 150–191. Granada: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kurz, J C and Marchinton, R L 1972 Radio telemetry studies of feral hogs in South Carolina. Journal of Wildlife Management 36: 1240–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, J, Kloeppel, P and Kallweit, E 1984 A case of reversed cannibalism: the piglets damaging the sow. Annales de Recherches Veterinaires 15: 275–277Google ScholarPubMed
Lammers G J and Lange A de 1986 Pre- and post- farrowing behaviour in primiparous domesticated pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 13–21Google Scholar
Lawrence, A B, Petherick, J C, McLean, K A, Deans, L A, Chirnside, J, Vaughan, A, Clutton, E and Terlouw, EMC 1994 The effect of environment on behaviour plasma Cortisol and prolactin in parturient sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, Z and Hurnik, J F 1994 An ellipsoid farrowing crate: its ergonomical design and effects on pig productivity. Journal of Animal Science 72: 2610–2616CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchant, J M, Corning, S and Broom, D M 1996 The effects of production parameters on piglet mortality in an open farrowing system. Animal Science 62: 675 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Meunier-Salaün, M C, Gort, F, Prunier, A and Schouten, W P G 1991 Behavioural patterns and progesterone, Cortisol and prolactin levels around parturition in European (Large-White) and Chinese (Meishan) sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, J J and Blecha, F 1987 An examination of behavioural, immunological and productive traits in four management systems for sows and piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, J J and Morrow-Tesch, J 1990 Productivity and behavior of sows in level vs sloped farrowing pens and crates. Journal of Animal Science 68: 82–87Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission 1996 Pig Yearbook. Meat and Livestock Commission: Milton Keynes, UKGoogle Scholar
National Agricultural Centre 1994 Update of the ACO Freedom Farrowing System. Newsletter No 49. National Agricultural Centre: Stoneleigh, UKGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R C and Wood-Gush, D G M 1985 The suckling behaviour of domestic pigs in a semi-natural environment. Behaviour 95: 11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passille, A M B de and Robert, S 1989 Behaviour of lactating sows: influence of stage of lactation and husbandry practices at weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, A M, Dodworth, T L and English, P R 1978 The performance of sows and litters penned individually or grouped in late lactation. Animal Production 27: 215–221Google Scholar
Petchey, A M 1991 Spatial preferences of farrowing sows. Animal Production 52: 577–578 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Phillips, P A and Fraser, D 1993 Developments in farrowing housing for sows and litters. Pig News and Information 14: 15N–55NGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P A, Fraser, D and Thompson, B K 1991 Preference by sows for a partially enclosed farrowing crate. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pig Improvement Company 1996 Pig Management Yearbook. Pig Improvement Company: Abingdon, UKGoogle Scholar
Rantzer, D, Svendsen, J and Weström, B 1995 Weaning of pigs raised in sow-controlled and in conventional housing systems. 1. Description of systems, production and bacteriology. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 25: 37–46Google Scholar
Rudd, A R, Simmins, P H, Mendl, M T and Maikin, S 1993 Production comparisons between farrowing crates and community farrowing systems. Animal Production 56: 423 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Sancha, S E and Arey, D S 1995 A note on sow preference for roofed farrowing areas. Farm Building Progress 117: 36–39Google Scholar
Schmid, H 1991 A practicable behaviour specific housing system for farrowing and lactating sows. Proceedings of the International Conference on Alternatives in Animal Husbandry p 33. University of Kassel: GermanyGoogle Scholar
Stängel, G and Jensen, P 1991 Behaviour of semi-naturally kept sows and piglets (except suckling) during 10 days postpartum. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A and Wood-Gush, D G M 1984 The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 15: 287–298Google ScholarPubMed
Stolba, A and Wood-Gush, D G M 1989 The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment. Animal Production 48: 419–425Google Scholar
Taverne, M, Willemse, A H, Dieleman, S J and Bevers, M 1979 Plasma prolactin, progesterone and oestradiol-17B concentrations around parturition in the pig. Theriogenology 15: 537–546Google Scholar
Van Putten, G and van de Burgwal, J A 1990 Group-housing systems for farrowing and lactating sows. In: Carter, V and Carter, H (eds) Group Housing of Sows. CEC: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K and Hansen, L L 1984 Tethered versus loose sows: ethological observations and measures of productivity. I. Ethological observations during pregnancy and lactation. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 15: 245–256Google Scholar
Wattankul, W, Sinclair, A, Stewart, A, Edwards, S A and English, P R 1996 Performance and behaviour of lactating sows and piglets in crate and multisuckling systems: a study involving European White and Manor Meishan genotypes. Animal Science 62: 676 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Wechsler, B 1996 Rearing pigs in species-specific family groups. Animal Welfare 5: 25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widowski, T M and Curtis, S E 1990 The influence of straw, cloth tassel or both on the prepartum behaviour of sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar