Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:25:08.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour and welfare: the visitor effect in captive felids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

P Suárez ,
P Recuerda  and
L Arias-de-Reyna
P Suárez*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Edificio Charles Darwin, 3a Planta, Campus Universitario de Rabanales, 14071, Córdoba, Spain
P Recuerda
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Edificio Charles Darwin, 3a Planta, Campus Universitario de Rabanales, 14071, Córdoba, Spain
L Arias-de-Reyna
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Edificio Charles Darwin, 3a Planta, Campus Universitario de Rabanales, 14071, Córdoba, Spain
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The influence of visitors on the welfare of captive animals, known as the visitor effect, may in some instances be stressful, adversely affecting animal health. Although the survival of many felid species depends on captive breeding programmes, little is known about this effect. A better understanding of the visitor effect is required to ensure the well-being of felids and the success of breeding programmes. We sought to determine whether the presence of visitors affects behaviour patterns and space use in five feline species in two Spanish zoos: Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), jaguar (Panthera onca), bobcat (Lynx rufus),ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and Asiatic lion (Panthera leo persica) and, if so, whether the effect on animal welfare is positive or negative. To our knowledge, no previous research has addressed the visitor effect in these species, with the exception of the jaguar. Data on animal behaviour, enclosure use, and visitor density were collected during the spring and summer of 2011 and 2012. Changes were observed for all studied species when the zoo was open to the public: four species devoted less time to complex behaviour (ie play, walk) and spent more time resting; ocelots and bobcats made more use of hidden spaces and less use of areas closer to visitors, while the jaguar tended to do the opposite. No correlation was found between visitor density and animal activity, indicating that animals are affected by the mere presence of visitors, regardless of their number. Our findings are in line with those reported by other authors, who have suggested that these behavioural changes are linked to chronic stress. Visitor effect was classed as negative for the welfare of all studied species apart from the jaguar. We advocate the need for future research into potential solutions to mitigate the adverse effect of visitors on felids.

Keywords

animal welfarefelidsspace usestressvistor effectzoo
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 25 - 34
Copyright
© 2017 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anderson, US, Benne, M, Bloomsmith, MA and Maple, TL 2002 Retreat space and human visitor density moderate undesir-able behavior in petting zoo animals. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 5: 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0502_03CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartolomucci, A, Pederzani, T, Sacerdote, P, Panerai, AE, Parmigiani, S and Palanza, P 2004 Behavioral and physiological characterization of male mice under chronic psychosocial stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29: 899–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2003.08.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekoff, M and Corcoran, J 1975 A method for the analysis of activity and spatial relations in animal groups. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 7(6): 569. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birke, L 2002 Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behavior of captive orangutans. Animal Welfare 11: 189–202Google Scholar
Blaney, EC and Wells, DL 2004 The influence of a camouflage net barrier on the behaviour, welfare and public perceptions of zoo-housed gorillas. Animal Welfare 13: 111–118Google Scholar
Breitenmoser, U, Mallon, DP, Ahmad Khan, J and Driscoll, C 2008 Panthera leo ssp persica. IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. www.iucnredlist.orgGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K and Brown, JL 2005 Relationships between pat-terns of fecal corticoid excretion and behavior, reproduction, and environmental factors in captive black (Diceros bicornis), and white (Ceratotherium simun) rhinoceros. Zoo Biology 24: 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, KE, Brown, JL and Seidensticker, J 1993 Behavioral and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90062-TCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, R 2002 Stress and fear. In: Horwitz, D, Mills, D and Heath, S (eds) Manual of Canine and Feline Behavioural Medicine pp 231–246. British Small Animal Veterinary Association: Gloucester, UKGoogle Scholar
Chamove, AS, Hosey, GR and Schaetzel, P 1988 Visitors excite primates in zoos. Zoo Biology 7: 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430070407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choo, Y, Todd, PA and Li, D 2011 Visitor effects on zoo orang-utans in two novel, naturalistic enclosures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 133: 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chosy, J, Wilson, M and Santymire, R 2014 Behavioral and physiological responses in felids to exhibit construction. Zoo Biology 33: 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, FE, Fitzpatrick, M, Hartley, A, King, AJ, Lee, T, Routh, A, Walker, SL and George, K 2012 Relationship between behavior, adrenal activity, and environment in zoo-housed west-ern lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Zoo Biology 31: 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J 1988 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Condon, ES, Wehnelt, S and Turber, S 2003 The effect of vis-itors on the behaviour of Humboldt's penguins at Chester Zoo. Federation Research Newsletter 4(3): 3Google Scholar
Cook, S and Hosey, GR 1995 Interaction sequences between chimpanzees and human visitors at the zoo. Zoo Biology 14: 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430140505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, GW and Foreman, DI 2009 Non-Parametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-By-Step Approach. Wiley: New Jersey, USA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118165881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, CM and Ha, RR 2010 Data collection in the zoo set-ting, emphasizing behavior. In: Kleiman, DG, Thompson, KV and Kirk Baer, C (eds) Wild Mammals in Captivity. Principles and Techniques for Zoo Management, Second Edition pp 386–406. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Cuadras, CM 1991 Métodos de Análisis Multivariante. Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias SA: Barcelona, Spain.[Title translation: Methods of multivariant analysis]Google Scholar
Dantzer, R 1991 Stress, stereotypies and welfare. Behavioural Processes 25: 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(91)90012-OCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davey, G 2005 The ‘visitor effect’. Zoo's Print Journal 20(6): 1900–1903. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1319.1900-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, G 2006a Visitor behavior in zoos: a review. Anthrozoös 19:143–157. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279306785593838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, G 2006b An hourly variation in zoo visitors interest: measurement and significance for animal welfare research. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 9(3): 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0903_7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davey, G 2007 Visitors’ effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: a review. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 10(2): 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700701313595CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, N, Schaffner, CM and Smith, TE 2005 Evidence that zoo visitors influence HPA activity in spider monkeys (Ateles geof-froyii rufiventris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90: 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltorai, AEM and Sussman, RW 2010 The ‘visitor effect’ and captive black-tailed prairie dog behavior. Der Zoologische Garten 79: 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zoolgart.2010.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fa, JE 1989 Influence of people on the behavior of display primates. In: Segal, EF (ed) Housing, Care and Psychological Well-Being of Captive and Laboratory Primates pp 270–290. Noyes Publications: USAGoogle Scholar
Fernández, EJ, Tamborski, MA, Pickens, SR and Timberlake, W 2009 Animal-visitor interactions in the modern zoo: Conflicts and interventions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glatston, AR, Geilvoet-Soeteman, E, Hora-Pecek, E and Van Hoff, J 1984 The influence of the zoo environment on social behavior of groups of cotton-topped tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus oedipus). Zoo Biology 3: 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430030307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, S and Broom, D 2009 Measuring zoo animal welfare: theo-ry and practice. Zoo Biology 28: 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20276Google Scholar
Hosey, G and Druck, P 1987 The influence of zoo visitors on the behavior of captive primates. Applied Animal Behavior Science 18: 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(87)90251-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosey, GR 1997 Behavioural research in zoos: academic per-spectives. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51: 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01104-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosey, GR 2000 Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect? Animal Welfare 9: 343–357Google Scholar
Lambeth, SP, Bloomsmith, MA and Alford, PL 1997 Effects of human activity on chimpanzee wounding. Zoo Biology 16: 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1997)16:4<327::AID-ZOO4>3.0.CO;2-C3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, MJ, Sherwen, SL and Rault, JL 2014 Number of near-by visitors and noise level affect vigilance in captive koalas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 154: 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macri, AM and Patterson-Kane, E 2011 Behavioural analysis of solitary versus socially housed snow leopards (Panthera uncia), with the provision of simulated social contact. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 130: 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appla-nim.2010.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maki, S, Alford, PL and Bramblett, C 1987 The effects of unfa-miliar humans on aggression in captive chimpanzee groups. American Journal of Primatology 12: 358Google Scholar
Mallapur, A and Chellam, R 2002 Environmental influences on stereotypy and the activity budget of Indian leopards (Panthera pardus) in four zoos in Southern India. Zoo Biology 21: 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.10063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallapur, A, Sinha, A and Waran, N 2005 Influence of visitor presence on the behaviour of captive lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) housed in Indian zoos. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94: 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appla-nim.2005.02.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maniatis, P 2010 Greek census 1981. A case of factorial corre-spondence analysis. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 35: 99–111Google Scholar
Margulis, SW, Hoyos, C and Anderson, M 2003 Effect of felid activity on zoo visitor interest. Zoo Biology 22: 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.10115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, L 1999 Response of captive orang-utans to human audiences. Master of Philosophy Thesis, University of Manchester, Bolton, UKGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G, Tromborg, CT, Kaufman, J, Bargabus, S, Simoni, R and Geissler, V 1992 More on the influence of zoo visitors on the behaviour of captive primates. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(92)90009-ZCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, KN and Tromborg, CT 2007 Sources of stress in cap-tivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 262–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimon, AJ and Dalziel, FR 1992 Cross-species interaction and communication: a study method applied to captive siamang (Hylobates syndactilus) and long-billed corella (Cacatua tenuirostris) contacts with humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80013-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donovan, D, Hindle, JE, McKeown, S and O’Donovan, S 1993 Effect of visitors on the behaviour of female cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and cubs. International Zoo Yearbook 32: 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.1993.tb03542.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pifarré, M, Valdez, R, González-Rebelesa, C, Vázquez, C, Romano, M and Galindo, F 2012 The effect of zoo visitors on the behaviour and faecal cortisol of the Mexican wolf (Canis lupus baileyi). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 136: 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.11.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadros, S, Goulart, VDL, Passos, L, Vecci, MAM and Young, RJ 2014 Zoo visitor effect on mammal behaviour: Does noise matter? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 156: 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, LS and Waran, NK 1996 The modern zoo: how do peo-ple perceive zoo animals? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47: 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)01014-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, I 1999 Recommendations for the housing of cats in the home, in catteries and animal shelters, in laboratories and in vet-erinary surgeries. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 1: 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-612X(99)90207-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, SR, Schapiro, SJ, Hau, J and Lukas, KE 2009 Space use as an indicator of enclosure appropriateness: a novel measure of captive animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, KMD, Haskell, MJ, Glasbey, C, Jones, RB and Lawrence, AB 2004 Fractal analysis of animal behavior as an indi-cator of animal welfare. Animal Welfare 13(S): S99–S103Google Scholar
Sellinger, R and Ha, J 2005 The effects of visitor density and intensity on the behavior of two captive jaguars (Panthera onca). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 8: 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0804_1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selye, H 1976 The Stress of Life. McGraw Hill: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Sherwen, SL, Magrath, MJL, Butler, KL, Phillips, CJC and Hemsworth, PH 2014 A multi-enclosure study investigating the behavioural response of meerkats to zoo visitors. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 156: 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appla-nim.2014.04.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S 1956 Estadística no Paramétrica Aplicada a las Ciencias de la Conducta. Trillas: Mexico. [Title translation: Non-parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences]Google Scholar
Simpson, L 2004 The effect of visitors on captive non-human pri-mates. Zoo Federation Research Newsletter 5(3): 5Google Scholar
Todd, PA, Macdonald, C and Coleman, D 2007 Visitor-asso-ciated variation in captive Diana monkey (Cercopithecus diana diana) behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107: 162–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderploeg, HA and Scavia, D 1979 Calculation and use of selectivity coefficients of feeding: zooplankton grazing. Ecological Modelling 7: 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(79)90004-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrancken, A, Van Elsacker, L and Verheyen, RF 1990 Preliminary study on the influence of the visiting public on the spa-tial distribution in captive eastern lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla graueri). Acta Zoologica et Pathologica Antverpiensia 81: 9–15Google Scholar
Wells, DL 2005 A note on the influence of visitors on the behavior and welfare of zoo-housed gorillas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appla-nim.2005.06.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wielebnowski, NC, Fletchall, N, Carlstead, K, Busso, JM and Brown, JL 2002 Non-invasive assessment of adrenal activity associated with husbandry and behavioral factors in the North American clouded leopard population. Zoo Biology 21: 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.10005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wormell, D, Brayshaw, M, Price, E and Herron, S 1996 Pied tamarins (Sanguinus bicolor bicolor) at the Jersey's Wildlife Preservation Trust: Management, behaviour and reproduction. Dodo Journal of the Wildlife Preservation Trust 32: 76–97Google Scholar