Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:45:38.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes of Turkish veterinarians towards animal welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

N Sabuncuoglu  and
O Coban
N Sabuncuoglu*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Veterinary College, Ataturk University, 25700, Ilica, Erzurum, Turkey
O Coban
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Veterinary College, Ataturk University, 25700, Ilica, Erzurum, Turkey
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A survey was carried out to examine the attitudes of Turkish veterinarians towards animal welfare issues. The email questionnaire consisted of three sections of statements with a five-point Likert scale for choices of answer. The first section included statements examining the attitudes of Turkish veterinarians to animal welfare issues relating to European Union (EU) Legislation (93/119/EC, 95/29/EC, 2002/4EC and Council Regulation 1/2005). In the second, statements were designed to ascertain veterinarian attitudes towards the recently-passed Animal Protection Law, TR-5199. The statements in the last section were designed to assess the respondents' personal beliefs on a variety of welfare topics. The survey was sent to 615 veterinarians and the response rate was 40.2%. Turkish veterinarians expressed considerable support for the implications of animal welfare with the exception of statements regarding ‘stunning of ruminants pre-slaughter’, ‘phasing out of battery cages for poultry’ and ‘not operating on animals for aesthetic purposes’. In addition, they did not agree with the statements related to ‘ethological needs of farm animals’ and ‘effectiveness of EU laws and legislation in Turkey’. Females had higher mean values than males. The results of the survey indicated that significant concern for animal welfare issues is seen in the Turkish veterinarian population. Although the process of becoming a fully-integrated member of the EU will not occur rapidly, the influence of veterinarians could potentially enhance animal welfare in Turkey.

Keywords

animal welfareattitudeEuropean UnionlegislationsurveyTurkish veterinarians
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 27 - 33
Copyright
© 2008 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ajzen, I 1988 Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. The Dorsey Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 1989 Legislations for animal health. Ministry of Agriculture, Turkey. Official Gazette in Turkey March 1989. Basbakanlik Mevzuati Gelistirme ve Yayin Genel Mudurlugu Necatibey Cad No 1084: Bakanliklar-Ankara 06100, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 1993 On the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing. http://europa.eu/eurlex/en/consleg/pdf/1993/en_1993L0119_do_001.pdf (Accessed November 29 2007)Google Scholar
Anonymous 1995 Directive 91/628/EEC concerning the protection of animals during transport. http://europa.eu/eurlex/en/consleg/pdf/1995/en_1995L0029_do_001.pdf (Accessed November 29 2007)Google Scholar
Anonymous 2002 On the registration of establishments keeping laying hens, covered by Council Directive 1999/74/EC. http://eurlex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32002L0004&model=guichett (Accessed November 29 2007)Google Scholar
Anonymous 2004 Animal Protection Law, Law number: 5199. Official Gazette in Turkey July 2004. Basbakanlik Mevzuati Gelistirme ve Yayin Genel Mudurlugu Necatibey Cad No 1084: Bakanliklar-Ankara 06100, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 2005 On the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2005/l_003/l_00320050105en00010044.pdf (Accessed November 29 2007)Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006 Presidency of Religious Duties official website. http://www.diyanet.gov.tr (Accessed May 15 2006)Google Scholar
Coskun, B 2005 ‘If you look for a human‘. Hurriyet, Turkish newspaper, 9 November, Dogan Medya Centre: Bagcilar-Istanbul, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
Dodurka, T 2000 Psychology of Dog pp 231–232. Remzi Publications: Istanbul, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
European Commission 2005 Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. Special Euro barometer 229 / Wave 63.2 – TNS Opinion and Social. TNS House: Westgate, London, UKGoogle Scholar
FAWC 2004 Farm Animal Welfare Council. The five freedoms. http://www.fawc.org.uk/freedoms.html (Accessed May 5 2007)Google Scholar
Fox, MW 2001 Bringing life to ethics: Global bioethics for a humane society. State University of New York Press: Albany, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 1994 Religious slaughter and animal welfare: A discussion for meat scientists. Meat Focus International 3: 115–123Google Scholar
Heleski, CR, Mertig, AG and Zanella, AJ 2004 Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: A national survey of animal science faculty members. Journal of Animal Science 82: 2806–2814CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heleski, CR, Mertig, AG and Zanella, AJ 2005 Results of a national survey of US veterinary college faculty regarding attitudes toward farm animal welfare. Journal of American Veterinary Medicine Association 226(9): 1538–1546CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozen, A, Ozturk, R, Yasar, A, Armutak, A, Basagac, T, Ozgur, A, Seker, I and Yerlikaya, H 2004 An attitude of veterinary practitioners towards animal rights in Turkey. Veterinary Medicine Czech 49(8) 298-304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, ES and Padberscek, AI 2000 Veterinary Education and Students' attitudes towards animal welfare. The Veterinary Record 146(10): 269–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raekallio, M, Heinonen, KM, Kuussaari, J and Vainio, O 2003 Pain alleviation in animals: attitudes and practices of Finnish veterinarians. Veterinary Journal 165: 131–135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutgers, LJ and Barda, DB 1994 Normative questions in veterinary practice: a survey. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 119: 525–535Google ScholarPubMed
Saatci, M, Kaya, S and Gurdal, M 2005 Livestock transportation from Kars city and animal welfare. 1st Conference on Animal Welfare and Veterinary Education in Turkey pp 141-144. 9-10 June 2005, Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
Sabuncuoglu, N and Coban, O 2005 The slaughterhouses from animal welfare standpoint in Erzurum city. 1st Conference on Animal Welfare and Veterinary Education in Turkey pp 117-123. 9-10 June 2005, Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
Serpell, JA 2005 Factors influencing veterinary students' career choices and attitudes to animals. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Education 32: 491–496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, CHB 1998 Veterinarians and animal welfare. A New Zealand perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 59(1-3): 207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS 9.0 1999 SPSS for Windows Release. SPSS Inc Headquarters: Chicago, Illinois 60606, USAGoogle Scholar
Tavsancil, E 2002 Measurement of attitudes and data analyses with SPSS. Nobel Publications: Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
Tinga, EC, Adams, CI, Bonnet, BN and Ribble, CS 2001 Survey of veterinary technical and professional skills in students and recent graduates of a veterinary college. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 219: 924–931CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yerlikaya, H, Ozen, A, Yasar, A, Armutak, A, Ozturk, R, Bayrak, S, Gezman, A and Seker, I 2004 A survey of attitudes of Turkish veterinary students and educators about animal use in research. Veterinary Medicine Czech 49(11): 413–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, JH 1999 Biostatistical analysis pp 188. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar