Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T04:54:03.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attitudes of farmers towards Limousin cattle and their handling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

X Boivin*
Affiliation:
INRA UR1213, Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, Equipe Adaptation et Comportement Sociaux. F-63122 Saint-Genés Champanelle, France
L Marcantognini
Affiliation:
INRA UR1213, Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, Equipe Adaptation et Comportement Sociaux. F-63122 Saint-Genés Champanelle, France
P Boulesteix
Affiliation:
France Limousin Sélection, Pôle de Lanaud, 87220 Boisseuil, France
J Godet
Affiliation:
ISARA Lyon, 31, Place Bellecour. 69288 Lyon, France
A Brulé
Affiliation:
Institut de l'Elevage, 35652 Le Rheu, France
I Veissier
Affiliation:
INRA UR1213, Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, Equipe Adaptation et Comportement Sociaux. F-63122 Saint-Genés Champanelle, France
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]

Abstract

Farmers' behaviour towards their animals could be improved by developing training programmes designed to decrease handling stress and improve animal welfare. This requires key preliminary work to collate farmers' beliefs concerning beef cattle and their knowledge of how to handle them easily. This paper reports the preliminary results of a survey conducted in 2004 among Limousin farmers. Fifty-five percent of the 300 French beef cattle farmers surveyed returned a questionnaire covering ease of handling, husbandry conditions, attitudes towards cattle, and behaviour during handling and husbandry practices. The results revealed that farmers' attitudes were generally positive. However, variability within each item indicated the potential for improvement. Temperament of heifers or cows is the first trait considered in decisions on culling an animal. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed a relationship between positive attitudes towards animals and towards contact with the animals. Attitudes towards negative behaviour (hitting, shouting) during handling are independent of attitudes towards animals. Most farmers underline human contact followed by quality of the facilities for improving ease of handling. Surprisingly, 28% of the farmers surveyed did not recognise the genetic traits as an important factor in ease of handling. Farmers seem open to improving handling, in particular through positive human contact. These results combined with existing scientific knowledge and additional observations of handling will be useful in defining future training programmes for improving the welfare of beef cattle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boissy, A, Fisher, AD, Bouix, J, Hinch, GN and Le Neindre, P 2005 Genetics of fear in ruminant livestock. Livestock Production Science 93: 2332Google Scholar
Boivin, X, Lensink, J, Tallet, C and Veissier, I 2003 Stockmanship and Farm Animal Welfare. Animal Welfare 12: 479492Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH 2003 Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 185198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lensink, J, Boissy, A and Veissier, I 2000 The relationship between farmer's attitude and behaviour towards calves, and productivity of veal units. Annales Zootechnie 49: 313327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS/TAT 1999 User's guide, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Menke, C and Coleman, G 2002 The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 79: 195219CrossRefGoogle Scholar