Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:41:56.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Hunger in Growing Broiler Breeders in Relation to a Commercial Restricted Feeding Programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C J Savory ,
K Maros  and
S M Rutter
C J Savory*
Affiliation:
AFRC Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
K Maros
Affiliation:
University of Agriculture Sciences, Hungary
S M Rutter
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Devon, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From two weeks of age female broiler breeder chickens were fed either on a commercial daily ration (R), twice that amount (2R), or ad libitum (AL). Motivation to eat in R and 2R birds was compared every third week with that of AL birds subjected to 3-72h food deprivation. AL and 2R birds grew three and two times faster than R birds to 20 weeks, and AL birds ate two to four times as much per day as R birds, depending on age and on whether birds of the same age or weight were compared. When feeding motivation was measured in 16min tests with an operant procedure, numbers of responses by R and 2R birds were not related in a consistent way to the time since their daily meal ended Responses by AL birds were correlated consistently with the preceding period of food deprivation, but it was not possible to express hunger in R and 2R birds in terms of equivalent deprivation in AL birds, as intended, because feeding motivation in the two situations differed in magnitude. Instead, it was calculated that motivation to eat in R and 2R birds, from 8 to 20 weeks, was 3.6 and 1.9 times greater than that of maximally (72h) deprived AL birds. Another measure of feeding motivation with different birds, rate of eating in 10min tests, produced a similar index of hunger with 2R but not R birds. It is concluded that broiler breeders fed on the commercial ration eat only a quarter to a half as much as they would with free access to food, and that they are highly motivated to eat at all times. The modern broiler breeder industry is caught in a welfare dilemma, since on the one hand stock appear to be chronically hungry, while on the other hand less severe food restriction leads to reduced fertility and health problems.

Keywords

animal welfarechickensfeeding motivationfood restrictionhunger
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 131 - 152
Copyright
© 1993 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council 1990 Nutrient Requirements of Sows and Boars. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients, Report No. 4. CAB International: WallingfordGoogle Scholar
Appleby, M C and Lawrence, A B 1987 Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. Animal Production 45: 103–110Google Scholar
Baumeister, A, Hawkins, W F and Cromwell, R L 1964 Need states and activity level. Psychological Bulletin 61: 438–453Google ScholarPubMed
Bierer, B W, Elcazer, T H and Roebuck, D E 1965 Effect of feed and water deprivation on chickens, turkeys, and laboratory mammals. Poultry Science 44: 768–773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brake, J, Baker, M, Morgan, G W and Thaxton, P 1982 Physiological changes in caged layers during a forced molt. 4. Leucocytes and packed cell volume. Poultry Science 61: 790–795CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brambcll F W R (Chairman) 1965 Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals Kept Under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems. Cmnd2836. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: LondonGoogle Scholar
Dantzer, R 1976 Effect of diazepam on performance of pigs in a progressive ratio schedule. Physiology and Behaviour 17: 161–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I J H and Wood-Gush, DGM 1972 Thwarting of feeding behaviour in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 20: 444–451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAWC 1979 Farm Animal Welfare Council Press Statement No FAWCI1, December 5 1979Google Scholar
FAWC 1992 The five freedoms. Farm Animal Welfare Council Press Notice 9217, 7 October 1992Google Scholar
Gross, W B 1990 Effect of adrenal blocking chemicals on the responses of chickens and turkeys to environmental stressors and ACTH. Avian Pathology 19: 295–304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, W B and Siegel, H S 1983 Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Diseases 27: 972–979CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hocking, P M and Whitehead, C C 1990 Relationship between body fatness, ovarian structure and reproduction in mature females from lines of genetically lean or fat broilers given different food allowances. British Poultry Science 31: 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, P M, Waddington, D, Walker, M A and Gilbert, A B 1989 Control of the development of the ovarian follicular hierarchy in broiler breeder pullets by food restriction during rearing. British Poultry Science 30: 161–174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodos, W 1961 Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength. Science 134: 943–944Google ScholarPubMed
Hughes, B O and Wood-Gush, DGM 1973 An increase in activity of domestic fowls produced by nutritional deficiency. Animal Behaviour 21: 10–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katanbaf, M N, Dunnington, E A and Siegel, P B 1989 Restricted feeding in early and late-feathering chickens. 1. Growth and physiological responses. Poultry Science 68: 344–351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, J M and Baldwin, B A 1972 Taste preferences in pigs for nutritive and nonnutritive sweet solutions. Animal Behaviour 20: 706–718CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kostal, L, Savory, C J and Hughes, B O 1992 Diurnal and individual variation in behaviour of restricted-fed broiler breeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 361–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A B and Illius, A W 1989 Methodology for measuring hunger and food needs using operant conditioning in the pig. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24: 273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A B, Appleby, M C and MacLeod, H A 1988 Measuring hunger in the pig using operant conditioning: the effect of food restriction. Animal Production 47: 131137Google Scholar
Lawrence, A B, Appleby, M C, Illius, A W and MacLeod, H A 1989 Measuring hunger in the pig using operant conditioning: the effect of dietary bulk. Animal Production 48: 213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, M H, Hocking, P M and Robertson, G W 1992 Differential leucocyte responses to various degrees of food restriction in broilers, turkeys and ducks. British Poultry Science 33: 177–187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nitsan, Z, Nir, I and Petihi, I 1984 The effect of meal-feeding and food restriction on body composition, food utilization and intestinal adaptation in light-breed chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 51: 101–109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, K R, McGhee, G C, Osei, P and Beauchene, R E 1986 Effect of feed restriction on growth, body composition, and egg production of broiler females through 68 weeks of age. Poultry Science 65: 2226–2231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushen, J P 1985 Stereotypies, aggression and the feeding schedules of tethered sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 14: 137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, C J 1985 An investigation into the role of the crop in control of feeding in Japanese quail and domestic fowls. Physiology and Behaviour 35: 917–928Google ScholarPubMed
Savory, C J 1988 Rates of eating by domestic fowls in relation to changing food deficits. Appetite 10: 57–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savory, C J and Maros, K 1993 Influence of degree of food restriction, age and time of day on behaviour of broiler breeder chickens. Behavioural Processes 29: 179–190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savory, C J, Seawright, E and Watson, A 1992 Stereotyped behaviour in broiler breeders in relation to husbandry and opioid receptor blockade. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, C J, Carlisle, A, Maxwell, M H, Mitchell, M A and Robertson, G W (in press) Stress, arousal and opioid peptide-like immunoreactivity in restricted- and ad libitum-fed broiler breeder fowls. Comparative Biochemistry and PhysiologyGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, DGM and Gower, D M 1968 Studies on motivation in the feeding behaviour of the domestic cock. Animal Behaviour 16: 101–107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed