Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:17:03.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animal health and welfare state and technical efficiency of dairy farms: possible synergies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

L Tremetsberger ,
C Winckler  and
J Kantelhardt
L Tremetsberger
Affiliation:
Division of Livestock Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Strasse 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria
C Winckler
Affiliation:
Division of Livestock Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Strasse 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria Contact for correspondence: [email protected]
J Kantelhardt
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural and Forestry Economics, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Feistmantelstrasse 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study sought to investigate whether animal health and welfare state and changes were associated with technical efficiency in a sample of 34 Austrian dairy farms. Health and welfare were assessed twice using the Welfare Quality® (WQ) assessment protocol for dairy cattle. Following a baseline welfare assessment, farm-specific health and welfare planning was conducted on the farms. This included the identification, selection and implementation of measures in housing and management that aimed at improving health and welfare states. One year after implementation, farms were reassessed to evaluate changes in health and welfare states and consequences for farms’ technical efficiency were analysed using the Malmquist index. Our results indicated that farms with a higher health state (WQ principle score ‘Good health’) achieved higher technical efficiencies. However, we could not show that changes in the welfare state within a one-year period affected technical efficiency: across all farms, technical efficiency remained stable and Malmquist indices (indicating efficiency and technological change) could not be explained by the different welfare scores. Nevertheless, our study showed data envelopment analysis to be a valuable method for analysing the relationship between animal welfare and farm success and our results indicate substantial potential synergies between these two aspects.

Keywords

animal welfaredairy cowsdata envelopment analysisMalmquist indexon-farm assessmentWelfare Quality®
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , August 2019 , pp. 345 - 352
Copyright
© 2019 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Allendorf, JJ and Wettemann, PJ 2015 Does animal welfare influence dairy farm efficiency? A two-stage approach. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 7730–7740. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9390CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreasen, SN, Wemelsfelder, F, Sandøe, P and Forkman, B 2013 The correlation of Qualitative Behavior Assessments with Welfare Quality® protocol outcomes in on-farm welfare assess-ment of dairy cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 143: 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, AP, Rutherford, KMD, Langford, FM and Haskell, MJ 2011 The effect of lameness prevalence on technical efficien-cy at the dairy farm level: an adjusted data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 5449–5457. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogetoft, P and Otto, L 2011 Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. Springer: New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7961-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnis, MRN, Beerda, B, Hogeveen, H and Stassen, EN 2012 Foot disorders in dairy cattle: Impact on cow and dairy farmer. Animal Welfare 21: 33–40. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13345905673601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnes, A, Cooper, WW and Rhodes, E 1978 Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelli, T, Prasada Rao, DS, O’Donnell, CJ and Battese, GE 2005 An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
De Vries, M, Bokkers, EAM, van Schaik, G, Botreau, R, Engel, B, Dijkstra, T and de Boer, IJM 2013 Evaluating results of the welfare quality multi-criteria evaluation model for classifi-cation of dairy cattle welfare at the herd level. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 6264–6273. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVries, TJ and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2006 Feed stalls affect the social and feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 3522–3531. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72392-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyson, RG, Allen, R, Camanho, AS, Podinovski, VV, Sarrico, CS and Shale, EA 2001 Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 132: 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Färe, R, Grosskopf, S, Norris, M and Zhang, Z 1994 Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Reviev 84: 66–83Google Scholar
Fraser, D, Weary, DM, Pajor, EA and Milligan, BN 1997 A Scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical con-cerns. Animal Welfare 6: 187–20510.1017/S0962728600019795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, MJ, Leach, KA, Breen, JE, Green, LE and Bradley, AJ 2007 National intervention study of mastitis control in dairy herds in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 160: 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.160.9.287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansson, H, Szczensa-Rundberg, M and Nielsen, C 2011 Which preventive measures against mastitis can increase the tech-nical efficiency of dairy farms? Animal 5: 632–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110002247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrichs, AJ, Jones, CM, Gray, SM, Heinrichs, PA, Cornelisse, SA and Goodling, RC 2013 Identifying efficient dairy heifer producers using production costs and data envelop-ment analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 7355–7362. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, J, Shearer, JK and Webb, DW 2001 Effect of lameness on the calving-to-conception interval in dairy cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 218: 1611–1614. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2001.218.1611CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huijps, K, Lam, TJGM and Hogeveen, H 2008 Costs of masti-tis: facts and perception. Journal of Dairy Research 75: 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029907002932CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, JN 2013 Impact of lameness and claw lesions in cows on health and production. Livestock Science 156: 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivemeyer, S, Maeschli, A, Walkenhorst, M, Klocke, P, Heil, F, Oser, S and Notz, C 2008 Effects of a two-year dairy herd health management programme on udder health, use of antibi-otics and longevity. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 150: 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1024/0036-7281.150.10.499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivemeyer, S, Smolders, G, Brinkmann, J, Gratzer, E, Hansen, B, Henriksen, BIF, Huber, J, Leeb, C, March, S, Mejdell, C, Nicholas, P, Roderick, S, Stöger, E, Vaarst, M, Whistance, LK, Winckler, C and Walkenhorst, M 2012 Impact of animal health and welfare planning on medicine use, herd health and production in European organic dairy farms. Livestock Science 145: 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livs-ci.2011.12.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, E, Shalloo, L, Geary, U, Kinsella, A, Thorne, F and Wallace, M 2012a The associations of management and demo-graphic factors with technical, allocative and economic efficiency of Irish dairy farms. Journal of Agricultural Science 150: 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859612000287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, E, Shalloo, L, Geary, U, Kinsella, A and Wallace, M 2012b Application of data envelopment analysis to measure tech-nical efficiency on a sample of Irish dairy farms. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 51: 63–77Google Scholar
Kirchner, MK, Westerath, SH, Knierim, U, Tessitore, E, Cozzi, G, Pfeiffer, C and Winckler, C 2014 Application of the Welfare Quality® assessment system on European beef bull farms. Animal 8:827–835. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kossaibati, MA and Esslemont, RJ 1997 The costs of production diseases in dairy herds in England. The Veterinary Journal 154:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-0233(05)80007-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latruffe, L, Fogarasi, J and Desjeux, Y 2012 Efficiency, produc-tivity and technology comparison for farms in Central and Western Europe: The case of field crop and dairy farming in Hungary and France. Economic Systems 36: 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2011.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Maggs, CM, Barker, ZE, Paul, ES, Bell, AK and Main, DCJ 2010 Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Research in Veterinary Science 89: 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Main, DCJ, Leach, KA, Barker, ZE, Sedgwick, AK, Maggs, CM, Bell, NJ and Whay, HR 2012 Evaluating an intervention to reduce lameness in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 2946–2954. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4678CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malmquist, S 1953 Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica 4: 209–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03006863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team 2013 A language and environment for statistical com-puting. R version 3.0.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
Rouha-Mülleder, C, Palme, R and Waiblinger, S 2010 Assessment of animal welfare in 80 dairy cow herds in cubicle housing - Animal health and other animal-related parameters. Wiener Tierärztliche Monatsschrift 97: 231–241Google Scholar
Simar, L and Wilson, PW 1998 Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science 44: 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simar, L and Wilson, PW 1999 Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research 115:459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00450-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steeneveld, W, Tauer, LW, Hogeveen, H and Oude Lansink, AGJM 2012 Comparing technical efficiency of farms with an automatic milking system and a conventional milking sys-tem. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 7391–7398. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, J 1958 Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26: 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tone, K 2004 Malmquist productivity index. In: Cooper, WW, Seiford, LM and Zhu, J (eds) Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis pp 203–227. Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7798-X_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremetsberger, L, Leeb, C and Winckler, C 2015 Animal health and welfare planning improves udder health and cleanliness but not leg health in Austrian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 6801–6811. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremetsberger, L and Winckler, C 2015 Effectiveness of ani-mal health and welfare planning in dairy herds: a review. Animal Welfare 24: 55–67. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.1.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaarst, M, Winckler, C, Roderick, S, Smolders, G, Ivemeyer, S, Brinkmann, J, Mejdell, CM, Whistance, LK, Nicholas, P, Walkenhorst, M, Leeb, C, March, S, Henriksen, BIF, Stöger, E, Gratzer, E, Hansen, B and Huber, J 2011 Animal health and welfare planning in organic dairy cattle farms. The Open Veterinary Science Journal 5: 19–2510.2174/1874318801105010019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welfare Quality® 2009 Welfare Quality®Assessment Protocol for Cattle. Welfare Quality®Consortium: Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003 Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Veterinary Record 153: 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.153.7.197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, PW 2013 Frontier Efficiency Analysis with R. R Package Version 2.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Tremetsberger et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 120.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Tremetsberger et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 93.7 KB