Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Sherwin, C.M
1998.
Light intensity preferences of domestic male turkeys.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
121.
Lewis, P.D.
and
Morris, T.R.
1998.
Responses of domestic poultry to various light sources.
World's Poultry Science Journal,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 1,
p.
7.
Davis, N J
Prescott, N B
Savory, C J
and
Wathes, C M
1999.
Preferences of Growing Fowls for Different Light Intensities in Relation to Age, Strain and Behaviour.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
193.
Jones, R B
and
Hocking, P M
1999.
Genetic Selection for Poultry Behaviour: Big Bad Wolf or Friend in Need?.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
343.
D'Eath, R.B
and
Stone, R.J
1999.
Chickens use visual cues in social discrimination: an experiment with coloured lighting.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
233.
Vandenbert, C.
and
Widowski, T.M.
2000.
Hens’ Preferences for High-Intensity High-Pressure Sodium or Low-Intensity Incandescent Lighting.
Journal of Applied Poultry Research,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 2,
p.
172.
Jones, R.B.
2001.
Environmental enrichment for poultry welfare.
BSAP Occasional Publication,
Vol. 28,
Issue. ,
p.
125.
Hlinak, Andreas
and
Schade, Rüdiger
2001.
Chicken Egg Yolk Antibodies, Production and Application.
p.
9.
Maddocks, Sam A.
Goldsmith, Arthur R.
and
Cuthill, Innes C.
2001.
The Influence of Flicker Rate on Plasma Corticosterone Levels of European Starlings, Sturnus vulgaris.
General and Comparative Endocrinology,
Vol. 124,
Issue. 3,
p.
315.
Moinard, C
Lewis, P D
Perry, G C
and
Sherwin, C M
2001.
The Effects of Light Intensity and Light Source on Injuries Due to Pecking of Male Domestic Turkeys (Meleagris Gallopavo).
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
131.
Sanotra, G.S.
Lund, J. Damkjer
and
Vestergaard, K.S.
2002.
Influence of light-dark schedules and stocking density on behaviour, risk of leg problems and occurrence of chronic fear in broilers.
British Poultry Science,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 3,
p.
344.
Bizeray, D
Estevez, I
Leterrier, C
and
Faure, JM
2002.
Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers.
Poultry Science,
Vol. 81,
Issue. 6,
p.
767.
Maddocks, S A
Bennett, ATD
and
Cuthill, IC
2002.
Rapid Behavioural Adjustments to Unfavourable Light Conditions in European Starlings (Sturnus Vulgaris).
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
p.
95.
Bizeray, D
Estevez, I
Leterrier, C
and
Faure, J.M
2002.
Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 79,
Issue. 1,
p.
27.
Maddocks, Sam A.
Bennett, Andrew T.D.
Hunt, Sarah
and
Cuthill, Innes C.
2002.
Context-dependent visual preferences in starlings and blue tits: mate choice and light environment.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 1,
p.
69.
Prescott, N B
Wathes, C M
and
Jarvis, J R
2003.
Light, Vision and the Welfare of Poultry.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
269.
King, L. A.
2003.
Behavioral Evaluation of the Psychological Welfare and Environmental Requirements of Agricultural Research Animals: Theory, Measurement, Ethics, and Practical Implications.
ILAR Journal,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 3,
p.
211.
Taylor, Pollyanna E
Scott, Graham B
and
Rose, Paul
2003.
The ability of domestic hens to jump between horizontal perches: effects of light intensity and perch colour.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 2,
p.
99.
Greenwood, Verity J
Smith, Emma L
Goldsmith, Arthur R
Cuthill, Innes C
Crisp, Louisa H
Walter-Swan, Mark B
and
Bennett, Andrew T.D
2004.
Does the flicker frequency of fluorescent lighting affect the welfare of captive European starlings?.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 86,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
145.
Barber, CL
Prescott, NB
Wathes, CM
Le Sueur, C
and
Perry, GC
2004.
Preferences of growing ducklings and turkey poults for illuminance.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
211.