Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:55:03.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water intake patterns in the weanling pig: effect of water quality, antibiotics and probiotics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. McLeese ,
M. L. Tremblay ,
J. F. Patience  and
G. I. Christison
J. M. McLeese
Affiliation:
Prairie Swine Centre, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W0, Canada
M. L. Tremblay
Affiliation:
Prairie Swine Centre, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W0, Canada
J. F. Patience
Affiliation:
Prairie Swine Centre, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W0, Canada
G. I. Christison
Affiliation:
Prairie Swine Centre, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W0, Canada
Get access

Abstract

ad libitum water intake patterns in newly weaned pigs were investigated, with particular emphasis on the impact of water quality, the presence or absence of food antibiotics and the use of water soluble probiotic. Pigs were given water containing low (217 mg/l), medium (2350 mg/l) or high (4390 mg/l) levels of total dissolved solids (TDS), either with or without a water additive containing probiotic, and a medicated (experiment 1 and 3) or unmedicated (experiment 2) starter diet for 20 (experiments 1 and 2) or 5 (experiment 3) days immediately post weaning. Water intake, food intake, growth and faecal scores were recorded, and blood was sampled to determine ionic composition. There appeared to be two phases of water consumption: intake in the first 5 days post weaning did not appear to be related to apparent physiological need, whilst later, water consumption increased in parallel with food intake and body-weight gain. In the earlier period, behaviour may have been a primary influence; water intake was not related to faecal scores and water quality had no effect on consumption. In the later phase, intake increased at higher TDS concentrations. Water quality had no effect on performance when pigs were given medicated food; however, pigs receiving unmedicated food exhibited reduced gain (P > 0·05) and food efficiency (P < 0·05), and increased incidence of diarrhoea, when consuming water with elevated mineral levels. The probiotic did not improve performance or decrease scouring (P > 0·05). Blood composition was not affected by treatment (P > 0·05). Although physiological need may be fundamental in establishing water requirements, it appears that other factors such as water quality and the process of weaning influence consumption patterns. These data provide further encouragement for research to define true requirements for water, which by necessity would require identification of all mediating factors.

Keywords

diarrhoeapigswater intakewater quality
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 135 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. M. and Stothers, S. C. 1978. Effects of saline water high in sulfates, chlorides and nitrates on the performance of young weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 47:900–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andren, B. and Persson, S. 1983. Acid-base and electrolyte changes in 1-3 days old piglets infected with enteropathic Escherichia coli and in spontaneous cases of piglet diarrhoea. Ada Veterinaria Scandinavica 24: 84–98.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Carpenter, J. L. 1990. The water requirement of growing-finishing pigs — theoretical and practical considerations.. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1990 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 115–136. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H., Carpenter, J. L. and Gill, B. P. 1986. Recent advances in nutrition: the significance of water in pig productivity, profitability and welfare. Proceedings of the Meat and Livestock Commission Agricultural Development and Advisory Service pig conference, Diss and Caythorpe.Google Scholar
Fraser, D., Patience, J. F., Phillips, P. A. and McLeese, J. M. 1990. Water for piglets and lactating sows: quantity, quality and quandaries. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 2990 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 137–160. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D. and Phillips, P. A. 1989. Lethargy and low water intake by sows during early lactation: a cause of low piglet weight gains and survival? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24:13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. and Cole, C. B. 1988. The scientific basis of the probiotic concept. In Probiotics: theory and applications (ed. Stark, B. A. and Wilkinson, J. M.), pp. 1–14. Chalcombe Publications, Marlow.Google Scholar
Gill, B. P., Brooks, P. H. and Carpenter, J. L. 1986. The water intake of weaned pigs from 3 to 6 weeks of age. Animal Production 42: 470 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Harvey, R. F. and Read, A. E. 1973. Saline puragatives act by releasing cholecystokinin. The Lancet, July 28, p. 185.Google Scholar
Nienaber, J. A. and Hahn, G. L. 1984. Effects of water flow restriction and environmental factors on performance of nursery-age pigs. Journal of Animal Science 59:1423–1429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, D. W., Wahlstrom, R. C., Libal, G. W. and Olson, O. E. 1979. Effects of sulfate in water on swine reproduction and young pig performance. Journal of Animal Science 49: 664–667.Google Scholar
Patience, J. F. 1990. Probiotics: opportunities and applications and implications. Proceedings of the western nutrition conference (ed. Engstrom, D. and Martin, J.), pp. 105–112. University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. A. and Fraser, D. 1989. A water dispenser modified to promote water use by piglets in the first days after birth. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 31:175–177.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. A., Fraser, D. and Thompson, B. K. 1990. The influence of water nipple flow rate and position, and room temperature on sow water intake and spillage. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 6: 75–78.Google Scholar
Pollman, D. S. 1986. Probiotics in pig diets. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1986 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 193–205. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Pouteaux, V. A. 1981. The involvement of protein source and chilling in the etiology of diarrhea in newly weaned pigs. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.Google Scholar
Pouteaux, V. A., Christison, G. I. and Rhodes, C. S., 1982. The involvement of dietary protein source and chilling in the etiology of diarrhea in newly weaned pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62:1199–1209.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. W. L. 1970. Comparative aspects of the response of the intestine to its ionic environment. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 34: 641.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1986. SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Stothers, S. C. 1970. Saline water and weanling pigs. Applied research papers in animal science, Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
Stothers, S. C. and Palmer, W. M. 1961. Further studies of saline water for swine. Annual report of livestock research, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg 11: 6–9.Google Scholar
Wu, J. F. 1987. The microbiologist's function in developing action-specific microorgansms. In Biotechnology in the feed industry (ed. Lyons, T. P.), pp. 181–197. Alltech Technical Publications, Nicholasville, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Yang, T. S., Howard, B. and Macfarlane, W. V. 1981. Effects of food on drinking behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Ethology 7: 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, T. S., Price, M. A. and Aherne, F. X. 1984. The effect of level of feeding on water turnover in growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12:103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar