Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:35:26.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water absorption and the drying and cooling rates in mink (Mustela vison) following simulated diving

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

H. T. Korhonen  and
P. Niemelä
H. T. Korhonen*
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Fur Animals, FIN-69100 Kannus, Finland
P. Niemelä
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Fur Animals, FIN-69100 Kannus, Finland
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate water absorbing capacity and the drying and cooling rates of fur in farmbred male mink (Mustela vison) following 10 s of simulated diving. Comparisons were made between adult animals with summer and winter fur. The water loss from a swimming pool following diving in summer amounted to 146 (s.e. 14) g and 152 (s.e. 9) g in dry and wet mink, respectively (P > 0·05). During winter the corresponding values averaged 148 (s.e. 9) and 125 (s.e. 7) g, respectively (not significant: P > 0·05). No significant differences between summer and winter were found for dry mink. In wet-coated mink, on the other hand, water loss from the swimming pool was significantly greater (P 0·05) in summer than in winter. Drying of the fur was slow and significantly (P 0·05) affected by season so that half of the 100 g water absorbed by fur evaporated within 20 min during winter (at –2°C) whereas in summer (at +18°C) it took 60 min. A slower drying rate in summer could be benefical as it allows long-term body cooling in warm environment. Cooling constants of winter-coated dry mink (0·01955 (s.e. 0·00183) per min) were not significantly different (P > 0·05) from those of winter-coated wet mink (0·02091 (s.e. 0·00144) per min) indicating that energy costs of wet fur after diving are not critical for the survivial of the mink during winter.

Keywords

animal welfareenergy cost of activitiesfurminkswimmingthermoregulation
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 277 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birks, J. 1986. Mink. The Mammal Society, Oswestry, England.Google Scholar
Blomstedt, L. 1998. Pelage development in mink, ferret and blue fox, and some influencing factors. Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H. and Lasiewski, R. C. 1972. Metabolism of weasels: the cost of being long and thin. Ecology 53: 939–943.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. and Mason, G. 1999. Assessing the behavioural needs of mink (Mustela vison) using three methodologies from human microeconomics. Proceedings of the 33rd international congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 17-21 August 1999, Lillehammer, Norway, p. 82.Google Scholar
Dunstone, E. and O’Connor, R.J. 1979. Optimal foraging in an amphibious mammal. II. A study using principal component analysis. Animal Behaviour 27: 1195–1201.Google Scholar
Dunstone, N. 1978. The fishing strategy of the mink (Mustela vison): time-budgeting of hunting effort. Behaviour 67: 157–177.Google Scholar
Dunstone, N. 1979. Swimming and diving behaviour of the mink. Carnivore 2: 56–61.Google Scholar
Dunstone, N. 1983. Underwater hunting behaviour of the mink (Mustela vison Schreber): an analysis of constraints on foraging. Acta Zoologica Fennica 174: 201–203.Google Scholar
Dunstone, N. and Birks, J. D. S. 1978. The feeding ecology of mink (Mustela vison) in coastal habitat. Journal of Zoology, London 212: 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunstone, N. and Sinclair, W. 1978. Comparative aerial and underwater visual acuity of the mink, Mustela vison Schreber, as a function of discrimination distance and stimulus luminance. Animal Behaviour 26: 6–13.Google Scholar
European Convention. 1999. Recommendation concerning fur animals. Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes (TAP).Google Scholar
Gerell, R. 1967. Food selection in relation to habitat in mink (Mustela vison). Oikos 18: 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, F. F. and Gofton, N. 1982. Heart rate values for beaver, mink and muskrat. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 73A: 249–251.Google Scholar
Gumperetz, M. L. and Browne, C. 1993. Repeated measures in randomized block and split-splot experiments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 625–639.Google Scholar
Hansen, C. P. B. 1999. Does access to water for swimming change behaviour and reproduction in adult farm mink. NJF-seminar nr. 308, 22-23 Oktober 1999, Rey kjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Hansen, C. P. B. and Jeppesen, L. L. 2001a. Swimming activity of farm mink (Mustela vison) and its relationship to stereotypies. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A 51: 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, C. P. B. and Jeppesen, L. L. 2001b. Use of water for swimming and its relationship to temperature and other factors in farm mink (Mustela vison). Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A 51: 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, H. 1988. Seasonal comparison of body composition and hair coat structure between mink and polecat. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 91A: 469–473.Google Scholar
Korhonen, H. and Harri, M. 1984. Thermophysical properties of nests of farmed mustelids: thermal insulation. Scientifur 8: 285–290.Google Scholar
Korhonen, H., Harri, M. and Asikainen, J. 1983. Thermoregulation in the polecat and raccoon dog: a comparative study with stoat, mink and blue fox. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 74A: 225–230.Google Scholar
Korhonen, H., Niemelä, P., Rekilä, T. and Jauhiainen, L. 2001. Behaviour of farmed mink with and without access to swimming water. Proceedings of the 13th Nordic symposium of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 25-27 January 2001, Lammin, Finland, p. 14.Google Scholar
Mason, G., Clareborough, C. and Cooper, J. 1999. Drink or swim? Using substitutability and physiological responses to frustration to assess the importance of swimming-water for mink. Proceedings of the 33rd international congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 17-21 August 1999, Lillehammer, Norway, p. 83.Google Scholar
Mason, G. J., Cooper, J. and Clarebrough, C. 2001. Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature 410: 35–36.Google Scholar
Mendl, M. 2001. Asessing the welfare state. Nature 410: 31–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohaibes, M., Harri, M., Mononen, J., Pyykönen, T., Kasanen, S. and Ahola, L. 2001. Individual variation in swimming motivation in mink. Proceedings of the 13th Nordic symposium of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 25-27 January 2001, Lammin, Finland, p. 15.Google Scholar
Montagna, W. and Parakkal, P. 1974. The structure and function of skin. Academic Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Morrison, P. R. and Tietz, W. J. 1957. Cooling and thermal conductivity in three small Alaskan mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 38: 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, T. B. and Dunstone, N. 1976. Underwater predatory behaviour of the American mink. Journal of Zoology, London 178: 395–412.Google Scholar
Racey, G. D. and Euler, D. L. 1983. Changes in mink habitat and food selection as influenced by cottage development in central Ontario. Journal of Applied Ecology 20: 387–402.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, K., Jeppesen, L. L. and Hansen, C. P. B. 1997a. Would you like to swim, Madam Mink? Scientifur 21: 247–251.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, K., Jeppesen, L. L. and Hansen, C. P. B. 1997b. The effect of swimming water and cage size on the behaviour of ranch mink (Mustela vison). Scientifur 21: 253–260.Google Scholar
Svendsen, P. and Carter, A. M. 1984. An introduction to animal physiology, second edition. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
Tauson, A.-H. 1999. Water intake and excretion, urinary solute excretion and some stress indicators in mink (Mustela vison). 1. Effect of ambient temperature and quantitative water supply to adult males. Animal Science 69: 171–181.Google Scholar
Valtonen, M., Vakkuri, O. and Blomstedt, L. 1995. Autumnal timing of photoperiodic manipulation critical via melatonin to winter pelage development in mink. Animal Science 61: 589–596.Google Scholar
West, N. G. and Vliet, B. N. van. 1986. Factors influencing the onset and maintenance of bradycardia in mink. Physiological Zoology 59: 451–463.Google Scholar
Williams, T. M. 1983. Locomotion in the north American mink, a semi-aquatic mammal. I. Swimming energetics and body drag. Journal of Experimental Biology 103: 155–168.Google Scholar
Wustenberg, W. and Wustenberg, M. 1988. Reducing heat stress in mink production units: basic principles of environmental control. In Biology, pathology and genetics of fur bearing animals (ed. Murphy, B. D. and Hunter, D. B.). Proceedings of the fourth international scientific congress in fur animal production, pp. 130–135. International Fur Animal Science Association, Toronto.Google Scholar