Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:06:41.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Varietal differences in rumen degradation of barley, wheat and hard wheat straws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Ramanzin
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche, Via Gradenigo, 6, 35131 Padova, Italy
L. Bailoni
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche, Via Gradenigo, 6, 35131 Padova, Italy
G. Beni
Affiliation:
Istituto di Genetica e Sperimentazione Agraria ‘N. Strampelli’, Via Marconi, 1, 36045 Lonigo (VI), Italy
Get access

Abstract

The rumen dry-matter degradation of straw from nine varieties of barley, nine varieties of wheat and seven varieties of hard wheat was studied to provide further information on varietal differences and their relationships with agronomic characteristics.

In all the cereals there were significant differences in in situ dry-matter disappearance between varieties. The range of differences was lower in hard wheat varieties compared with the other cereals. There were no significant correlations between straw degradability and plant height, days from sowing to heading and grain production and quality. Lignin concentration was significantly correlated to straw degradability (r = −0·937 in barley, −0·675 in wheat and −0·987 in hard wheat).

Leaf had lower concentrations of lignin and higher degradability than stem in barley and wheat but the two fractions were similar in hard wheat straws. The differences in degradation between the most and the least degradable straw varieties of each cereal species were mainly due to differences in degradability of both the fractions whereas the role of leaf and stem proportions was of minor importance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official methods of analysis. 13th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bhargava, P. K., Ørskov, E. R. and Walli, T. K. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 4. Selection and degradation of morphological components of barley straw by sheep. Animal Production 47: 105110.Google Scholar
Capper, B. S. 1988. Genetic variation in the feeding value of cereal straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 21: 127140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capper, B. S., Thomson, E. F. and Rihawi, S. 1989. Voluntary intake and digestibility of barley straw as influenced by variety and supplementation with either barley grain or cottonseed cake. Animal Feed Science and Technology 26: 105118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capper, B. S., Thomson, E. F., Rihawi, S., Termanini, A. and MacRae, R. 1986. The feeding value of straw from different genotypes of barley when given to Awassi sheep. Animal Production 42: 337342.Google Scholar
Erickson, D. O., Meyer, D. W. and Foster, A. E. 1982. The effect of genotypes on the feed value of barley straws. Journal of Animal Science 55: 10151026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural handbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, no. 379.Google Scholar
Kernan, J. A., Coxworth, E. C., Crowle, W. L. and Spurr, D. T. 1984. The nutritional value of crop residue components from several wheat cultivars grown at different fertilizer levels. Animal Feed Science and Technology 11: 301311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mould, F. L., Ørskov, E. R. and Mann, S. O. 1983. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10: 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakashima, Y. and Ørskov, E. R. 1990. Rumen degradation of straw. 9. Effect of cellulase and ammonia treatment on different varieties of rice straws and their botanical fractions. Animal Production 50: 309317.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Hovell, F. D. DeB. and Mould, F. 1980. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Tropical Animal Production 5: 195213.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal ofAgricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. and Kay, M. 1988. Prediction of intake by cattle from degradation characteristics of roughages. Animal Production 46: 2934.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Shand, W. J., Tedesco, D. and Morrice, L. A. F. 1990. Rumen degradation of straw. 10. Consistency of differences in nutritive value between varieties of cereal straws. Animal Production 51: 155162.Google Scholar
Ramanzin, M., Ørskov, E. R. and Tuah, A. K. 1986. Rumen degradation of straw. 2. Botanical fractions of straw from two barley cultivars. Animal Production 43: 271278.Google Scholar
Rexen, F. and Munck, L. 1984. Cereal crop for industrial use in Europe. European Economic Community publication EUR 9617 EM.Google Scholar
Shand, W. J., Ørskov, E. R. and Morrice, L. A. F. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 5. Botanical fractions and degradability of different varieties of oat and wheat straws. Animal Production 47: 387392.Google Scholar
Tuah, A. K., Lufadeju, E., Ørskov, E. R. and Blaekett, G. A. 1986. Rumen degradation of straw. 1. Untreated and ammonia-treated barley, oat and wheat straw varieties and triticale straw. Animal Production 43: 261269.Google Scholar
Walli, T. K., Ørskov, E. R. and Bhargava, P. K. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 3. Botanical fractions of two rice straw varieties and effects of ammonia treatment. Animal Production 46: 347352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. M., Hartman, G. P. and Bergman, J. W. 1981. In vitro digestibility, crude protein and phosphorus content of straw of winter wheat, spring wheat, barley and oat cultivars in eastern Montana. Agronomic Journal 73: 117121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar