Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:33:52.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variance of body weights and daily weight gains of weaner pigs housed at various stocking densities in confinement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. T. Kornegay ,
D. R. Notter ,
H. S. Bartlett  and
M. D. Lindemann
E. T. Kornegay
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
D. R. Notter
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
H. S. Bartlett
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
M. D. Lindemann
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
Get access

Abstract

Body weight and gain data from eight studies conducted with weaner pigs to determine the relationship between stocking density and performance were used to evaluate the effect of various stocking densities on several factors which measure variation within pens. The initial weight of the pigs ranged from 5·7 to 8·3 kg and final weight ranged from 17·7 to 32·1 kg. There were 244 pens of pigs with floor space ranging from 0·11 to 0·28 m2 per pig. Average daily gain and body weight were depressed as stocking density increased. Natural logarithms of variance, coefficients of variation and ranges of average daily gains and body weights were not increased by stocking density. Body weights and daily gains appeared equally effective in measuring variance of weaner pigs housed at various densities. These results indicate that increasing stocking density within the range of densities tested does not cause a greater variation in body-weight gains.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 1985 , pp. 369 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ford, J. J. and Teague, H. S. 1978. Effect of floor space restriction on age at puberty in gilts and on performance of barrows and gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 828–832.Google Scholar
Harper, A. F. and Kornegay, E. T. 1983. The effects of restricted floor space allowance and virginiamycin supplementation on the feedlot performance of swine. Livest. Prod. Sci. 10: 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornegay, E. T., Thomas, H. R., Arthur, S. R., Gaines, C. L., Bryant, K. L. and Knight, J. W. 1980. Pigs per cage, flooring materials and use of soybean hulls in starter diets for pigs housed in triple deck nurseries. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornegay, E. T., Thomas, H. R. and Bryant, K. L. 1981. Flooring materials, pigs per cage and use of oats in starter diets for pigs housed in triple deck nurseries. J. Anim. Sci. 53: 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornegay, E. T. and Notter, D. R. 1984. Effects of floor space and number of pigs per pen on performance. Pig News Inf. 5: 23–33.Google Scholar
Lindemann, M. D. and Kornegay, E. T. 1984. Feeder space allowance of weanling pigs as influenced by floor space allowance. Anim. Sci. Res. Rep. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, No. 3, pp. 15–21.Google Scholar
Meldrum, J. B., Troutt, H. F., Chickering, W. R., Ehrich, M. F. and Kornegay, E. T. 1984. The effect of zinc and selenium interactions on production performance of weanling pigs housed with adequate and restricted floor space. Anim. Sci. Res. Rep. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, No. 3, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1979. Nutrient Requirement of Domestic Animals. No. 2, Nutrient Requirement of Swine. 8th ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System. 1982. SAS User's Guide. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tindsley, Wendy E. C. and Lean, I. J. 1984. Effects of weight range at allocation on production and behaviour in fattening pig groups. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 12: 79–92.Google Scholar