Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:42:12.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Value of lucerne cobs for milk production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. A. E. Archibald ,
E. F. Thomson  and
R. C. Campling
K. A. E. Archibald
Affiliation:
Wye College, (University of London), Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH
E. F. Thomson
Affiliation:
Wye College, (University of London), Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH
R. C. Campling
Affiliation:
Wye College, (University of London), Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH
Get access

Summary

Three changeover experiments, each with 16 milking cows, were conducted to evaluate the effects of stage of growth of lucerne, level of feeding of lucerne or ryegrass and level of inclusion of barley. The artificially dried and processed forages were in the form of cobs and given to cows in addition to a basal ration of hay. Late-cut lucerne (organic matter digestibility, OMD, 55%) promoted significantly lower milk yields than early-cut lucerne (68% OMD). When offered ad libitum in two meals each day both forages were eaten in quantities of about 13 kg dry matter. Ryegrass cobs (79% OMD) produced more milk than lucerne cobs (59% OMD) but gave similar milk yields per unit of digestible organic matter. Production rations supplying similar amounts of digestible organic matter and composed of different proportions of lucerne cobs and rolled barley gave similar milk yields. It is concluded that the relative milk-producing value of processed forages depends on their content of digestible organic matter. However, their bulk may limit their value and the inclusion of cereal with the dried forage may be worth while.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , October 1975 , pp. 139 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Society Of Agricultural Engineers. 1967. Recommendation A.S.A.E.R. 2461. Method of determining modulus of uniformity and modulus of fineness of ground feed. Yb. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs, 1967, p. 301.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Milne, J. A. 1972. The nutritive value of processed roughages for milking cattle. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 1972, pp. 53–60.Google Scholar
Christian, K. R. and Coup, M. R. 1954. Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VI. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. 36: 328–330.Google Scholar
Connell, J. 1973. Dried forages in dairy cow feeding. Proc. 1st int. Green Crop Drying Congr., Oxford, pp. 144–157.Google Scholar
Connell, J. and Foot, A. S. 1972. Production and feeding of dried grass wafers to dairy cows. Bienn. Revs. National Institute for Research in Dairying, Reading, 1972, pp. 52–64.Google Scholar
Connell, J. and Jones, J. G. W. 1968. The dried grass cube as a production concentrate for the dairy cow. Anim. Prod. 10: 231 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. 1958. Planning of Experiments. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Dri-Crop Developments Ltd. 1971. Dried Crops for Ruminant Feeding. A survey by Dri-Crop Developments Ltd., Tunbridge Wells, Kent, UK.Google Scholar
Francis, A. L., Kneale, W. A. and Strickland, M. J. 1973. Feeding dried grass to dairy cows. Expl. Husb. No. 24, pp. 70–84.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Reid, G. W. 1973. The effects of pelleting various diets on intake and digestibility in sheep and cattle. Anim. Prod. 16: 223–233.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Wainman, F. W. 1972. The nutritive value of processed roughages for fattening cattle and sheep. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 1972, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
Jarrige, R., Demarquilly, C, Journet, M. and Beranger, C. 1973. The nutritive value of processed dehydrated forages with special reference to the influence of physical form and particle size. Proc. 1st int. Green Crop Drying Congr., Oxford, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Thomson, E. F. and Campling, R. C. 1972. Value for milk production of artificially dried forages as cobs and pellets. Anim. Prod. 14: 69–75.Google Scholar
Niemann-Sorensen, A. 1969. Artificially dried grass products as feed for dairy cows. Proc. 3rd Gen. Meeting Europ. Grassld Fedn., pp. 105–112.Google Scholar
Strickland, M. J. 1973. Dried grass for the dairy cow. A.D.A.S. q. Rev. 10: 72–80.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1971. Dried forages and beef production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van es, A. J. and Honing, Y. van der. 1973. Intake and nutritive value of pelleted forage for lactating cows. Proc. 1st int. Green Crop Drying Congr., Oxford, pp. 73–80.Google Scholar