Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:30:47.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using molasses as an alternative to controlled release devices for administering n-alkane markers to cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

R. E. Hendricksen ,
C. Gazzola ,
M. M. Reich ,
R. F. Roberton ,
D. J. Reid  and
R. A. Hill
R. E. Hendricksen
Affiliation:
Agency for Food and Fibre Sciences, Department of Primary Industries, Box 6014, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Queensland 4702, Australia
C. Gazzola*
Affiliation:
Agency for Food and Fibre Sciences, Department of Primary Industries, Box 6014, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Queensland 4702, Australia
M. M. Reich
Affiliation:
Agency for Food and Fibre Sciences, Department of Primary Industries, Box 6014, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Queensland 4702, Australia
R. F. Roberton
Affiliation:
Agency for Food and Fibre Sciences, Department of Primary Industries, Brian Pastures Research Station, Gayndah, Queensland Australia
D. J. Reid
Affiliation:
Agency for Food and Fibre Sciences, Department of Primary Industries, Box 6014, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Queensland 4702, Australia
R. A. Hill*
Affiliation:
Agency for Food and Fibre Sciences, Department of Primary Industries, Box 6014, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Queensland 4702, Australia
*
†To whom all correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:[email protected] or [email protected]
†To whom all correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:[email protected] or [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine if molasses could be successfully used to administer dotriacontane (C32) and hexatriacontane (C36) n-alkane markers to steers and to compare this method with a commercially available intra-ruminal controlled release device (CRD). The experiment was conducted over two similar periods (runs) using 24 Brahman crossbred steers in each run to study the effect of marker delivery methods and tropical grass hay diets in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. All steers were housed individually in partially covered pens, received one of two buffel-grass hays (B20: 20-week regrowth; 0·72 g nitrogen (N) per 100 g and B8: 8-week regrowth; 1·11 g N per 100 g) and one of four marker delivery treatments (control: no marker; 200 mg/day of C32 and C36 n-alkanes from a CRD or offered three times (Ms ✕ 3) or five times (Ms ✕ 5) a day in molasses). Voluntary intake (VI) and dry matter digestibility (DMD) for diets differed (P < 0·001) with B8 greater than B20. There was no difference among marker treatments for VI but the control treatment had greater, unexplained and possibly spurious, DMD than the Ms ✕ 3 marker treatment. Although the recovery of n-alkanes was variable (0·84 to 1·05) adjacent odd- and even-chain n-alkanes were similar with no differences (P > 0·05) due to marker treatment or diet. The CRD supplied a consistent marker dose between 6 and 18 days after insertion. Deviation from the 24-h mean faecal concentration seldom varied more than 0·03 for the individual markers and 0·05 for C31/C32 and C33/C32 ratios for all treatments. Over all the n-alkanes studied, the between-day variation was less than the within-day variation. For instance, the average of subsamples taken at 06:00 h and 18:00 h was within proportionately 0·05 of the 10-day mean concentration for 0·38 and 0·25 of records for C32 and C36 markers, respectively. It was concluded that molasses containing C32 and C36 n-alkane markers and given either three or five times daily was as accurate as the commercial CRD in administering n-alkane markers to steers and provides a method of delivering n-alkanes over an extended period in grazing studies.

Keywords

alkanecattlevoluntary intake
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , June 2003 , pp. 471 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, N. R., Scheeder, M. R. L., Sutter, F., Krober, T. F. and Kreuzer, M. 2000. The accuracy of intake estimation based on the use of alkane controlled-release capsules and faeces grab sampling in cows. Annales de Zootechnie 49: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicker, R. W., Herd, R. M. and Oddy, V. H. 1996. Alkanes and controlled release devices for estimating intake of ryegrass by cattle. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 20: 107.Google Scholar
Dillon, P. and Stakelum, G. 1990. Dosed and herbage alkanes for predicting silage intake with dairy cows: the effect of concentrate type and level of feeding. Proceedings of the VIIth European grazing workshop, Wageningen, paper W5.Google Scholar
Dove, H. 1992. Using the n-alkanes of plant cuticular wax to estimate the species composition of herbage mixtures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43: 1711–1724.Google Scholar
Dove, H., Freer, M. and Foot, J. Z. 1988. Alkane capsules for measuring pasture intake. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 13: 131.Google Scholar
Dove, H. and Mayes, R. W. 1991. The use of plant wax alkanes as marker substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42: 913–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H. and Mayes, R. W. 1999. Developments in the use of plant wax markers for estimating diet selection in herbivores. In Emerging techniques for studying the nutritional status of free-ranging herbivores (ed. Dove, H. and Coleman, S. W.), satellite meeting of the Vth international symposium on the nutrition of herbivores, San Antonio, Texas (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
Dove, H., Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. and Ellis, K. J. 2002a. Factors influencing the release rate of alkanes from an intra-ruminal, controlled release device, and the resultant accuracy of intake estimation in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53: 681–696.Google Scholar
Dove, H., Scharch, C., Oliván|M. and Mayes, R. W. 2002b. Using n-alkanes and known supplement intake to estimate roughage intake in sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society for Animal Production 24: 57–60.Google Scholar
Hameleers, A., McNab, J. and Mayes, R. W. 1996. Use of saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons (alkanes) as markers in nutrition studies in chickens. British Poultry Science 37: 105–106.Google Scholar
Hatt, J. -M., Lechner-Doll, M. and Mayes, B. 1998. The use of n-alkanes as markers for the determination of digestive strategies of captive giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis). Zoo Biology 17: 295–309.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatt, J. -M., Mayes, R. W., Clauss, M. and Lechner-Doll, M. 2001. Use of artificially applied n-alkanes as markers for the estimation of digestibility, food selection and intake in pigeons (Columba livia). Animal Feed Science and Technology 94: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricksen, R. E., Reich, M. M., Roberton, R. F., Reid, D. J., Gazzola, C., Rideout, J. A. and Hill, R. A. 2002. Estimating the voluntary intake and digestibility of buffel-grass and lucerne hays offered to Brahman-cross cattle using n-alkanes. Animal Science 74: 567–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynd, P. I. and Ellis, K. J. 1984. A controlled release device for digesta flow studies in grazing cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15: 700.Google Scholar
Kotb, A. R. and Luckey, T. D. 1972. Markers in nutrition. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 42: 813–845.Google ScholarPubMed
Letso, M. 1996. A study of the use of n-alkanes to determine dietary intake and digestibility in grazing rabbits. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Marais, J. P., Figenschou, D. L., Escott-Watson, P. L. and Webber, L. N. 1996. Administration in suspension-form of n-alkane external markers for dry matter intake and diet selection studies. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 126: 207–210.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Dove, H., Chen, X. D. and Guada, J. A. 1995. Advances in the use of faecal and urinary markers for measuring diet composition, herbage intake and nutrient utilisation in herbivores. In Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores (ed. Journet, M. Grenet, E. Farce, M. -H. Theriez, M. and Dermarquilly, C.), proceedings of the IVth international symposium on the nutrition of herbivores, Paris, pp. 381–406.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W. and Duncan, A. J. 1999. New developments in the use of plant wax markers to determine intake. In Emerging techniques for studying the nutritional status of free-ranging herbivores (ed. Dove, H. and Coleman, S. W.), satellite meeting of the VIth international symposium on the nutrition of herbivores, San Antonio, Texas (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. and Colgrove, P. M. 1988. Digestion and metabolism of dosed even-chain and herbage odd-chain n-alkanes in sheep. Proceedings of the 12th general meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Dublin, pp. 159–163.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. and Colgrove, P. M. 1986. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 161–170.Google Scholar
Newman, J. A., Cribari-Neto, F. and Jensen, M. J. 1998. The sensitivity of n-alkane analysis to measurement error: implications for use in the study of diet composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 131: 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohajuruka, O. A. and Palmquist, D. L. 1991. Evaluation of n-alkanes as digesta markers in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 69: 1726–1732.Google Scholar
Oliván, M., Dove, H., Mayes, R. W. and Hoebee, S.E. 1999. [Recent developments in the use of alkanes and other plant wax components to estimate intake and diet composition in herbivores. ] Revista Portuguesa de Zootecnia 6: 1–26.Google Scholar
Parker, W. J. 1990. Application of intraruminal chromium controlled release capsules to the measurement of herbage intake in sheep at pasture. Ph. D. thesis, Massey University. (Review in Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 50: 437–442.)Google Scholar
Stakelum, G. and Dillon, P. 1990. Dosed and herbage alkanes as feed intake predictors with dairy cows: the effect of feeding level and frequency of perennial ryegrass. Proceedings of the VIIth European grazing workshop, Wageningen, paper W4.Google Scholar
Unal, Y. and Garnsworthy, P. C. 1999. Estimation of intake and digestibility of forage-based diets in group-fed dairy cows using alkanes as markers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 133: 419–425.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., O’Riordan, E. G. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1991. The use of n-alkanes for the estimation of herbage intake in sheep: accuracy and precision of the estimates. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116: 319–323.Google Scholar