Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:04:57.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of carcass weight to classify Manchego sucking lambs and its relation to carcass and meat quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. T. Díaz ,
J. de la Fuente ,
S. Lauzurica ,
C. Pérez ,
S. Velasco ,
I. Álvarez ,
F. Ruiz de Huidobro ,
E. Onega ,
B. Blázquez  and
V. Cañeque
M. T. Díaz
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Departamento de Tecnología de los Alimentos, Carretera de la Coruña km 7·5, 28040 Madrid, Spain
J. de la Fuente
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Departamento de Tecnología de los Alimentos, Carretera de la Coruña km 7·5, 28040 Madrid, Spain
S. Lauzurica
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Veterinaria, Departamento de Producción Animal, Avda Puerta de Hierro, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
C. Pérez
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Veterinaria, Departamento de Fisiología Animal (Biología), Avda. Puerta de Hierro, s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain
S. Velasco
Affiliation:
Instituto Madrileño de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria, Apdo 127, 28800 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
I. Álvarez
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Departamento de Tecnología de los Alimentos, Carretera de la Coruña km 7·5, 28040 Madrid, Spain
F. Ruiz de Huidobro
Affiliation:
Instituto Madrileño de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria, Apdo 127, 28800 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
E. Onega
Affiliation:
Instituto Madrileño de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria, Apdo 127, 28800 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
B. Blázquez
Affiliation:
Instituto Madrileño de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria, Apdo 127, 28800 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
V. Cañeque*
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Departamento de Tecnología de los Alimentos, Carretera de la Coruña km 7·5, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
E-mail address: Caneque @ inia.es
Get access

Abstract

Eighty-seven Manchego sucking lambs raised exclusively on maternal milk were slaughtered. The carcasses were weighed immediately after dressing and classified according to hot carcass weight (HCW): low HCW (<5.5 kg), medium HCW (5.5 to 6.5 kg) and high HCW (≥ 6.5 kg). The effects of this classification system on carcass and meat quality were studied. Carcass conformation improved as carcass weight increased; carcasses became more compact. Carcass fatness increased (P < 0.001) as carcasses became heavier. With regard to the joints, leg (P < 0.001) and shoulder (P < 0.05) proportions decreased as carcass weight increased, whereas loin-rib (P < 0.001) and flank (P < 0.001) proportions increased. The proportion of fat in the leg clearly increased in the heavier carcasses (P < 0.001), while that of bone decreased (P < 0.001) and that of muscle was not affected. pH at 24 h in the m. longissimus dorsi and m. semitendinosus decreased as carcass weight increased. The only meat colour parameter affected by carcass weight was the yellowness index; lighter-weight carcasses displayed lower index (P < 0.05). Cooking losses were unaffected as carcass weight increased, whereas with regard to tenderness, the shear force value tended to be higher in the low carcass weight group. No differences between carcass weight groups were found in the sensory analysis. Fatty acid composition did not show any significant effect due to carcass weight except in stearic fatty acid (C18:0); C18:0 proportion decreased (P < 0.01) as carcasses became heavier. Carcass weight affected carcass quality (all carcass quality parameters studied were higher in the heavier carcasses), whereas meat quality varied little as a result the small variation between carcass weights in sucking lambs.

Keywords

carcass qualitycarcass weightlambsmeat quality
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 61 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apple, J. K., Unruh, J. A., Minton, J. E. and Barlett, J. L. 1993. Influence of repeated restraint and isolation stress and electrolyte administration on carcass quality and muscle electrolyte content of sheep. Meat Science 35: 191–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Association of Offi cial Analytical Chemists. 1996. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Aziz, N. N., Ball, R. O., Sharpe, P. H. and McCutcheon, B. 1993. Growth, carcass composition and meat quality of crossbred lambs at different slaughter weights. Proceedings of the 39th international congress of meat science and technology. INRA-ITOVIC, Paris.Google Scholar
Beriain, M. J., Horcad, A., Purroy, A., Lizaso, G. and Chasco, J. 2000. Characteristics of Lacha and Rasa Aragonesa lambs slaughtered at three live weights. Journal of Animal Science 78: 3070–3077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicer, O., Gueney, O. and Pekel, E. 1995. Effect of slaughter weight on carcass characteristics of Awassi male lambs. Journal of Applied Animal Research 8: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cañeque, V. Velasco, S., Díaz, M., Pérez, C., Huidobro, F., Lauzurica, S., Manzanares, C. and Gonz´lez, J. 2001. Effect of weaning age and slaughter weight on carcass and meat quality of Talaverana breed lambs raised at pasture. Anima Science. 73: 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre Internationale de I'Eclaire 1976. Définition d' un espace de couleur pour deux coordonnées de chromaticité et la luminosité. Supplement no. 2 to CIE, publication no. 15 (E-1 3 1), 1971/ (TC-1–3). Centre Internationale de l' Eclairage, Paris.Google Scholar
Cifuni, G. F., Napolitano, F., Pacelli, C., Riviezzi, A. M. and Girolami, A. 2000. Effect of age at slaughter on carcass traits, fatty acid composition and lipid oxidation of Apulian lambs. Small Ruminant Research 35: 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer-Rocher, F., Delfa, R. and Sierra, I. 1988. Méthode normalisée pour l'étude des caractères quantitatifis et qualitatifs des carcasses ovines produites dans le Basin Méditerranéen on fonction des systèmes de production. Programme AGRIMED-CIHEAM: ‘Les carcasses d'agneaux méditerranéens’ December 1986, Zaragoza. CEE Rapport EUR/11479 FR. Office des Publications Officielles des Communautés Européennes, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Colomer-Rocher, F., Morand-Fehr, P. and Kirton, A. H. 1987. Standard methods and procedures for goat carcass evaluation, jointing and tissue separation. Livestock Production Science 17: 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, H. P., Bernholdt, H. F., Dikeman, M. E., Greene, B. E., Moody, W. G. Guidelines for cookery and sensory evaluation of meat. American Meat Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Crouse, J. D., Ferrell, C. L., Field, R. A., Busboom, J. R. and Miller, G. J. 1982. The relationship of fatty acid composition and carcass characteristics to meat flavour in lamb. Journal of Food Quality 5: 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, C. E., Graafhuis, A. E., Muir, P. D. and Chrystall, B. B. 1993. The effect of growth rate and ultimate pH on meat quality of lambs. Meat Science 35: 63–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, M. T., Cañeque, V., Lauzurica, S., Velasco, S., Ruíz de Huidobro, F. and Pérez, C. 2004. Prediction of suckling lamb carcass composition from objective and subjective carcass measurements. Meat Science 66: 895–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, M. T., Velasco, S., Cañeque, V., Lauzurica, S., Ruiz de Huidobro, F., Pérez, C., González, J., and Manazanares, C., 2002. Use of concentrate or pasture for fattening lambs and its effect on carcass and meat quality. Small Ruminant Research 43: 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, M. T., Velasco, S., Pérez, C., Lauzurica, S., Huidobro, F..and Cañeque, V. 2003. Physico-chemical characteristics of carcass and meat Manchego-breed suckling lambs slaughtered at different weights. Meat Science 65: 1085–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dransfield, E., Nute, G. R., Hogg, B. W. and Walters, B. R. 1990. Carcass and eating quality of ram, castrated ram and ewe lambs. Animal Production 50: 291–299.Google Scholar
European Union. 1993. Commission regulation (EEC) no. 461/93 of 26 February 1993 laying down detailed rules for the Community scale for the classification of carcass of ovine animals. Official Journal of the European Communities L 49: 70–74.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. V. and Boer, H. de. 1994. The EAAP standard method of sheep carcass assessment. Carcass measurements and dissection procedures. Livestock Production Science 38: 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, R. J. 1981. Effect of high concentrate feeding on the carcass quality and fat coloration of grass reared steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61: 575–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuente, J. de la, Tejon, D., Rey, A., Thos, J. and López-Bote, C. 1998. Effect of rearing system on growth, body composition and development of digestive system of young lambs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 78: 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grau, R. and Hamm, R. 1953. Eine einfache Methode zur bestimmung de Wasserbindung in Muskel. Naturwissenschaften 40: 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr, Bowman, J.C., and Robinson, T. J. 1983. Hammond's farm animals, fifth edition. E. Arnold Publishers Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Hanson, S. W. F. and Olley, J. 1963. Application of the Bligh and Velasco, Dyer method of lipid extraction to tissue homogenates. Biochemistry Journal 89: 101–102.Google Scholar
Hill, F. 1966. The solubility of intramuscular collagen in meat animals of various ages. Journal of Food Science 31: 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeremiah, L. E. 1998. Development of a quality classification system for lamb carcasses. Meat Science 48: 211–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeremiah, L. E., Smith, G. C. and Carpenter, Z. L. 1971. Palatability of individual muscles from ovine leg steaks as related to chronological age and marbling. Journal of Food Science 35: 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeremiah, L. E., Tong, A. K. W. and Gibson, L. L. 1997. The influence of lamb chronological age, slaughter weight and gender on physiological maturity indicators. Sheep and Goat Research Journal 13: 96–104.Google Scholar
Kadim, I. T., Purchas, R. W., Davies, A. S., Rae, A. L. and Barton, R. A. 1993. Meat quality and muscle fibre type characteristics of Southdown rams from high and low backfat selection lines. Meat Science 33: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemp, J. D., Shelley, J. M., Ely, D. G. and Moody, W. G. 1972. Effects of castration and slaughter weight on fatness, cooking losses and palatability of lamb. Journal of Animal Science 34: 560–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Crane, B., Paterson, D. J. and Clare, N. T. 1975. Yellow fat in lambs caused by carotenoid pigmentation. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 18: 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, A. 1994. Use of colour measurements in quality control of food. Food Technology 48: 62–71.Google Scholar
Lawrie, R. A. 1992. Meat science, fifth edition. Woodhead Publishers Ltd, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ledward, D. A. 1992. Colour of raw and cooked meat. In The chemistry of muscle based foods(ed. Johnston, D. E., Knight, M. K. and Ledward, D. A.), pp. 128–144. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
López, M. 1987. Calidad de la canal y de la carne en los tipos de lechal, ternasco y cordero de la raza Lacha y estudio de su desarrollo. Ph. D. thesis. University of Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Malmfors, G. 1995. Lamb carcass grading in the Nordic countries. In Production of sheep meat in accordance to market demands, NYF seminar, Iceland, no. 256, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Miguel, E., Onega, E., Cañeque, V., Velasco, S., Díaz, M. T., Lauzurica, S. Pérez, C., Bl´zquez, B., Rui´z de Huidobro, F. 2003. Carcass classification in suckling lambs. Discrimination ability of the European Union scale. Meat Science 63: 107–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monin, G. 1989. Facteurs biologiques des qualités de la viande. In Croissance bovins et qualité viande, Colloquie, pp.177–196. INRA, Rennes.Google Scholar
Morbidini, L., Sarti, D. M. and Sarti, F. M. 1995. Qualitá dellecarcasse e caractteristiche fisiche delle carni di agnelli pesanti appenninici. Proceedings of the ASPA, XI congress, Grado, Italy, pp. 319–320.Google Scholar
Morrison, W. R. and Smith, L. M. 1964. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters and dimethyl acetals from lipids with boron fluoride-methanol. Journal of Lipid Research 5: 600–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, P. C., Tortem, J. and Spurlock, G. M. 1964. Eating quality of lamb. Overall comparisons and interrelationships. Food Technology 18: 1785–1788.Google Scholar
Purchas, R. W., Yan, X. and Hartley, D. G. 1999. The influence of a period of ageing on the relationship between ultimate pH and shear values of beef m. longissimus thoracis. Meat Science 51: 135–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rojas, A., Lopez-Bote, C., Rota, A., Martin, L., Rodríguez, P. L. and Tovar, J. J. 1994. Fatty acid composition of Verata goat kids fed either goat milk or commercial milk replacer. Small Ruminant Research 14: 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Huidobro, F. and Cañeque, V. 1993. Producción de carneen en corderos de raza Manchega. I. Estudios de los rendimientos en canal, de las pérdidas en el matadero y de la importancia de los despojos. Investigación 8: 111–125.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Huidobro, F., Miguel, E., Di´az, M. T., Velasco, S., Lauzurica, S., Pérez, C., Onega, E., Blázquez, B. and Cañeque, V. 2003. Carcass classification in suckling lambs. II. Comparison among subjective carcass classification methods: fatness scales and conformation scales with 0.25 point-intervals. Meat Science 66: 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Huidobro, F., Sancha, J. L., Lopez, D., Cantero, M. A., Cañeque, V., Velasco, S., Manzanares, C., Gayan, J., Lauzurica, S., and Perez, C. 1998. Caracteri´sticas instrumentales y sensoriales de la carne de corderos lechales de raza Talaverana. Investigación Agraria, Producción 13: 21–30.Google Scholar
Russo, C. and Preziuso, G. 2000. Effetto della fonte energetica a del l' etá di macellazione sulla produzione dell'agnello pesante.Proceedings of the SIPAOC, XIV congress, Vietcisul, Mare, Italy, pp. 283–286.Google Scholar
Russo, C., Preziuso, G. and Verita, P. 2003. EU carcass classification system: carcass and meat quality in light lambs. Meat Science 64: 411–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sañudo, C., Alfonso, M., Sanchez, A., Delfa, R. and Teixeira, A. 2000. Carcass and meat quality in light lambs from different fat classes in the E. U. carcass classification system. Meat Science 56: 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sañudo, C., Campo, M. M., Sierra, I., Maria, G. A., Olleta, J. L. and Santolaria, P. 1997. Breed effect on carcase and meat quality of suckling lambs. Meat Science 46: 357–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sañudo, C., Santolaria, M. P., Maria, G., Osorio, M. and Sierra, I. 1996. Influence of carcass weight on instrumental and sensory lamb meat quality in intensive production system. Meat Science 42: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sañudo, C., Sierra, I., Olleta, J. L., Martin, L., Campo, M. M., Santolaria, P., Wood, J. D. and Nute, G. R. 1998. Influence of weaning on carcass quality, fatty acid composition and meat quality in intensive lamb production systems. Animal Science 66: 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarti, D. M., Morbidini, V. l. and Panella, F. 1991. Caractteristiche carne quantitative e qualitative delle carcasse di agnelli di razza Appenninica macellati a diverse età ed alimentati con differenti diete. Proceedings of the ASPA, IX congress, Rome, Italy, pp. 1029–1041.Google Scholar
Sharma, N., Gandermer, G. and Goutefongea, R. 1987. Comparative lipid composition of porcine muscle at different anatomical locations. Meat Science 19: 121–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. C., Dutson, T. R., Hostetler, R. L. and Carpenter, Z. L. 1976. Fatness rate of chilling and tenderness of lamb. Journal of Food Science 41: 748–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M. B., Kemp, J. D., Moody, W. G., Ely, D. G. and Fox, J. D. 1980. Effect of breed and slaughter weight on physical, chemical and organoleptic properties of lamb carcasses. Journal of Animal Science 51: 1102–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statgraphics Plus 1994. Statgraphics plus: reference manual, version 4. Statistical Graphics Corporation, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
Velasco, S., Lauzurica, S., Cañeque, V., Pérez, C., Huidobro, F.,Manzanares, C. and Di´az, M. T. 2000. Carcass and meat quality of Talaverana breed sucking lambs in relation to gender and slaughter weight. Animal Science 70: 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, P. D. 2000. Meat science: an introductory text, first edition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, A., Daly, C. C. and Devine, C. E. 1996. The effects of ultimate pH of meat on tenderness changes during ageing. Meat Science 42: 67–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wulf, M D., O'Connor, S. F., Tatum, J. D. and Smith, G. C. 1997. Using objective measures of muscle colour to predict beef longissimus tenderness. Journal of Animal Science 75: 684–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zygoyiannis, D., Kufidis, D., Katsaounis, N. and Philips, P., 1992. Fatty acid composition of carcass fat of indigenous (Capra prisca) suckled Greek kids and milk of their does. Small Ruminant Research 8: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar