Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:49:50.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symptoms of muscular hypertrophy in heterozygous steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. L. Mason
I. L. Mason
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Animal Genetics, Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

1. Some characteristics are described of 10 steer progeny of a Friesian bull which is known to have carried the factor for muscular hypertrophy.

2. On average these steers had a higher birth weight, lighter hide and liver, smaller feet and cannon bones, a lower percentage of fat and higher percentage of lean in the 10th rib joint, than the progeny of three other Friesian bulls reared at the same time and under the same conditions.

3. No one character was an adequate criterion for separating affected from normal progeny. It appears possible that the bull concerned was homozygous for the double muscling gene, and that all his progeny showed one or more symptoms of the condition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1963 , pp. 57 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kidwell, J. F., Vernon, E. H., Crown, R. M. & Singletary, C. B., 1952. Muscular hypertrophy in cattle. J. Hered., 43: 62.Google Scholar
Koch, P., Fischer, H. & Schumann, H., 1957. Erbpathologie der landwirtschaftlichen Haustiere. Berlin and Hamburg: Paul Parey, p. 29.Google Scholar
Kronacher, C., 1934. Genetik und Tierzüchtung. (Handbuch der Vererbungswissen-schaft, Band III, Ed. Baur und Hartmann). Berlin: Gebrüder Bomtraeger, p. 139.Google Scholar
MacKeixar, J. C., 1960. The occurrence of muscular hypertrophy in South Devon cattle. Vet. Rec., 72: 507.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board, 1960–1961. Muscular hypertrophy or ‘double muscling’ in a Friesian calf. Report of the Production Division. No. 11, p. 122.Google Scholar
Paci, C., 1935. Indagine e controlli sulla formazione della sottorazza albese. Riv. Zootec., 17: 149.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W. & Williams, D. R., 1962. Muscular hypertrophy in cattle. Anim. Prod., 4: 302 (Soc. Proc).Google Scholar
Raimondi, R., 1956–1957. Studio sui bovini piemontesi a ‘groppa doppia’. Ann. Acad. Agric. Torino, 99: 285.Google Scholar
Raimondi, R., 1961. Esperienza comparativa di ingrassamento e di macellazione tra vitelli piemontesi a “groppa doppia” e comuni. Ann. Sper. agr., N.S., 15: 105.Google Scholar
Schrode, R. R. & Lush, J. L., 1947. The genetics of cattle. Adv. Genet., 1: 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. H., 1949. The occurrence of the double-muscled character in beef cattle. Thesis Kansas State College (Cited by Koch, Fischer and Schumann).Google Scholar
Vial, V. E. & Mason, I. L., 1962. Heritability estimates for growth and carcase characters in Friesian steers. VIIIth int. Congr. Anim. Prod., III, 20.Google Scholar
Weber, A. D. & Ibsen, H. L., 1934. The occurrence of the double-muscled character in purebred beef cattle. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., 27: 228.Google Scholar
Wiesner, E., 1960. Die Erbschäden der landwirtschaftlichen Nutztiere. Jena: Gustav Fischer, p. 66Google Scholar
Wriedt, C., 1929. Die Vererbung des Doppellender-Charakters bei Rindern. Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre, 51: 482.Google Scholar