Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:20:10.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sweet lupin seed meal as a protein source for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. R. Taverner
M. R. Taverner
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, S. S. Cameron Laboratory, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Get access

Summary

The growth performance, carcass quality and digestive efficiency of growing pigs were used to compare sweet lupin seed meal (SLSM) to soya bean meal and meat meal as a source of supplementary protein to wheat in diets for pigs, and to study the influence of low levels of lysine and methionine, high levels of crude fibre and oil, and possible toxic factors in SLSM on the use of SLSM in such diets.

The growth rate and food utilization of pigs between 20 and 80 kg live weight were in the order soya bean meal > SLSM > meat meal, but only the difference between soya bean meal and meat meal was significant. These feeds did not differ significantly in their effects on the proportion of lean in the ham. Adding lysine to the SLSM diet improved growth performance but adding methionine did not. The digestibility of crude fibre in diets containing SLSM was greater than that in diets containing soya bean meal; the digestible energy contents of SLSM and soya bean meal were 4·13±0·05 and 4·16±0·08 Mcal/kg dry matter, respectively. Pigs fed on a diet containing 27·5% SLSM grew faster but utilized food as efficiently when fed ad libitum as on a restricted scale of feeding. The subcutaneous fat of pigs fed on SLSM had a higher iodine number than that of pigs fed on soya bean meal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , June 1975 , pp. 413 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3. Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1960. Official Methods of Analysis. 9th ed. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
BAILEY, R. W., MILLS, S. E. and HOVE, E. L. 1974. Composition of sweet and bitter lupin seed hulls with observations on the apparent digestibility of sweet lupin hulls by young rats. J. Sd. Fd Agric. 25: 955–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRAUDE, R. and ESNAOLA, M. A. 1973. Methionine and cystine requirements of growing pigs. Performance, nitrogen retention and carcass composition of growing pigs given semi-purified diets supplemented with graded levels of DL-methionine. Br. J. Nutr. 30: 437–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Florence, W. C. S. 1965. The influence of varying proportions of plant and animal supplements on the growth performance of porkers. S. Afr. J. agric. Sd. 8: 661–672.Google Scholar
FORBES, R. M. and HAMILTON, T. S. 1952. The utilization of certain cellulosic materials by swine. J. Anim. Sd. 11: 480–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. 1971. Nutritional Evaluation of Meat and Bone Meal. Victorian Department of Agriculture, Division of Agricultural Chemistry. Divisional Report No. 2.Google Scholar
GLADSTONES, J. S. 1970. Lupins as crop plants. Fid Crop Abstr. 23: 123–147.Google Scholar
LEA, C. H. H., SWOBODA, P. A. T. and GATHERUM, D. P. 1970. A chemical study of soft fat in crossbred pigs. J. agric. Sd., Camb. 74: 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1968. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 2. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. Publ. National Research Council, Washington D.C., No. 1599.Google Scholar
Sociètè De Chimie Organique Et Biologique. 1972. [Animal Feeding—Industrial Recommendations.] Technical document of the Department of Animal Nutrition, France, No. 111.Google Scholar