Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:51:36.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supplementation of maize stover for Ethiopian Menz sheep: effects of cottonseed, noug (Guizotia abyssinica) or sunflower cake with or without maize on the intake, growth, apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance and excretion of purine derivatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

P. O. Osuji ,
S. Sibanda  and
I. V. Nsahlai
P. O. Osuji
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
S. Sibanda
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
I. V. Nsahlai
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Abstract

Thirty-six male Ethiopian Menz sheep (9 to 22 months old, average live weight 15·8 (s.d. 1·84) kg), given maize stover (1·5 times ad libitum) supplemented with either 75 g cottonseed cake (CSC), 114 g noug cake (NGC; Guizotia abyssinica) or 112 g sunflower cake (SFC) with or without maize grain, were used in an 88-day study comprising growth and balance trials. The trials were undertaken according to a randomized-block design with a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement.

There were no significant interactions (P > 0·05). Sheep consumed significantly more stover when supplemented with CSC compared with NGC and SFC (P < 0·05). Maize grain significantly increased organic matter intake (P < 0·001). Although CSC tended to support lower live-weight gains, the effect of protein was not significant. Maize grain increased live-weight gains (P < 0·01).

Urinary nitrogen (N) excretions were similar between CSC and SFC but about 0·22 higher with NGC (P > 0·05). The faecal N output was 0·33 (P < 0·01) and 0·18 (P < 0·05) higher with CSC than with NGC and SFC respectively. Maize grain had no effect on any of the N-balance measurements.

Cottonseed cake supported lower daily production of purine derivatives (PD) (P < 0·01), microbial purine (P < 0·01) and microbial protein (P < 0·01) than either NGC or SFC. Maize grain increased the daily excretion of total PD (P < 0·05), microbial purine (P < 0·05) and microbial protein (P < 0·05). Neither the protein source nor maize grain affected the efficiency of microbial protein synthesis. It was concluded that SFC was utilized more effectively both in terms of rumen microbial N synthesis, N retention and growth. The addition of a small amount of energy as crushed maize grain increased microbial N synthesis, N retention and live-weight gain.

Keywords

maize stovernitrogen balanceoilseed cakespurinessheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , December 1993 , pp. 429 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboud, A. A. O., Owen, E., Reed, J. D. and McAllan, A. B. 1990. Feeding sorghum stover to Ethiopian sheep: effect of stover variety and amount offered on growth, intake and selection. Animal Production 50: 593A (abstr.).Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Amaning-Kwarteng, K., Kellaway, R. C. and Kirby, A. C. 1986. Supplemental protein degradation, bacterial protein synthesis and nitrogen retention in sheep eating sodium hydroxide-treated straw. British Journal of Nutrition 55:557–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official methods of analysis. 13th ed. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bowman, J. G. P. and Asplund, J. M. 1988. Nitrogen utilization, ruminal fermentation and abomasal nitrogen flow in sheep fed Caucasian bluestem hay supplemented with lucerne or urea. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20: 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, L. G., King, W. R. and McDonald, C. L. 1987. Growth of young Merino sheep grazing cereal stubbles and supplemented ad-libitum with oats, of different crude protein contents sprayed with various amounts of urea. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27: 339–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. B., Hovell, F. D. DeB, Ørskov, E. R. and Brown, D. S. 1990. Excretion of purine derivative by ruminants: effect of exogenous nucleic acid supply on purine derivative excretion by sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 63: 131–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X. B., Mathieson, J., Hovell, F. D. DeB. and Reeds, P. J. 1990. Measurement of purine derivatives in urine of ruminants using automated methods. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 53: 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, D. C. and Santos, A. 1981. Effect of graded levels of soybean meal and of a non protein nitrogen-molasses supplement on consumption and digestibility of wheat straw. Journal of Animal Science 53:1609–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W. 1986. An introduction to rumen studies, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M., Mathison, G. W. and Milligan, L. P. 1981. Effect of rumen degradability of supplements on intake of barley straw by steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61: 1055–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, P. T. 1987. Supplements other than forages. In The nutrition of herbivores (ed. Hacker, J. B. and Thernouth, J. H.), pp. 429–464. Academic Press, Marrickville, Australia.Google Scholar
Egan, A. R. and Moir, R. J. 1965. Nutritional status in intake regulation in sheep. 1. Effect of duodenally infused single dose of casein, urea and propionate upon voluntary intake of low-protein roughage by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16: 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R., McMeniman, N. P., Norton, B. W. and Calderon Cortes, F. J. 1984. The food intake response of sheep fed five roughage sources supplemented with formaldehyde treated casein with and without urea. Animal Production in Australia 15: 337–340.Google Scholar
Hassan, S. A. and Bryant, M. J. 1986. The response of store lambs to protein supplementation of a roughage-based diet. Animal Production 42: 73–79.Google Scholar
Hovell, F. D. DeB., Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A. and MacLeod, N. A. 1983. Basal urinary nitrogen excretion and growth response to supplemental protein by lambs close to energy equilibrium. British Journal of Nutrition 50:173–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hume, I. D. 1970. Synthesis of microbial protein in the rumen. III. Effect of dietary protein. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21: 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. A. and Siebert, B. D. 1980. The utilization of spear grass (Heteropogon contortus). IV. The nature and flow of digesta in cattle fed on spear grass alone and with protein or nitrogen or sulfur. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31: 1037–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, T. J. and Leng, R. A. 1979. Protein nutrition of growing lambs. I. Response in growth and rumen functions of supplementation of a low-protein-cellulosic diet with either urea, casein or formaldehyde-treated casein. British Journal of Nutrition 42: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllan, A. B. and Griffith, E. S. 1987. The effects of different sources of nitrogen supplementation on the digestion of fibre components in the rumen of steers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 17: 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A. and Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1982. Animal nutrition. 3rd ed. Longman, New York.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C. and Miller, E. L. 1981. Quantitative studies of food protein degradation and the energetic efficiency of microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of sheep given chopped lucerne and rolled barley. British Journal of Nutrition 45: 587–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nsahlai, I. V. 1991. The effect of quantity and quality of dietary protein upon straw utilization by steers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. and Pirie, R. 1973. The effect of bypassing the rumen with supplements of protein and energy on intake of concentrate by sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 30: 361–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortigues, I., Smith, T., Oldham, J. D., McAllan, A. B. and Siviter, J. W. 1989. Nutrient supply and growth of cattle offered straw based diets. British Journal of Nutrition 62: 601–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osafo, E. L. K., Owen, E., Said, A. N., Gill, M., McAllan, A. B. and Sherington, J. 1992. Feeding sorghum stover to Ethiopian, yearling cattle: effects of amount of stover offered and cottonseed cake supplement on intake and growth. Animal Production 54: 501A (abstr.).Google Scholar
Pigden, W. J. 1972. Sugar cane as livestock feed. Report to Caribbean Development Bank, Barbados.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Leng, R. A. 1987. Matching ruminant production systems with available resources in the tropics and sub-tropics. Penambul Books, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Redman, R. G., Kellaway, R. C. and Leibholz, J. 1980. Utilization of low quality roughages: effect of urea and protein supplements of differing solubility on digesta flows, intake and growth rate of cattle eating oaten chaff. British Journal of Nutrition 44: 343–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satter, L. D. and Roffler, R. E. 1975. Nitrogen requirement and utilization in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 58: 1219–1235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibanda, S., Osuji, P. O. and Nsahlai, I. V. 1993. The degradation of oilseed cakes and their effects on the intake and rumen degradability of maize stover given to Ethiopian Menz sheep. Animal Production 57: 421–428.Google Scholar
Siebert, B. D. and Hunter, R. A. 1982. Supplementary feeding of grazing animals. In Nutritional limits to animal production from pastures, proceedings of an international symposium, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia, 1981, pp. 409–426. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Sriskandarajah, N. and Kellaway, R. C. 1982. Utilization of low quality roughages: effects of alkali treatment of wheat straw on intake by and growth rate of cattle, with and without a supplement of cotton seed meal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriskandarajah, N. and Kellaway, R. C. 1984. Effects of alkali treatment of wheat straw on intake and microbial protein synthesis in cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 51: 289–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.04. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tudor, G. D., McGuigan, K. R. and Norton, B. W. 1985. The effects of three protein sources on the growth and feed utilization of cattle fed cassava. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104:11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, M. 1992. Rapeseed meal as a supplementary protein for dairy cows on grass silage-based diets, with the emphasis on the Nordic AAI-PBV feed protein evaluation system. Agricultural Science, Finland 1: 367–437.Google Scholar
Van Bruchem, J., Rouwers, S. M. G., Bangma, G. A. and Lettering, C. P. 1985. Digestion of proteins of varying degradability in sheep. 1. Fermentation in and rate of passage from the reticulorumen. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 33: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Niekerk, B. D. H. and Jacobs, J. A. 1985. Protein, energy and phosphorus supplementation of cattle fed low quality forage. South African Journal of Animal Science 15: 133–136.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. 1971. Factors limiting the intake of feed by sheep. V. Feed intake and the productive performance of the ruminant lamb in relation to the quantity of crude protein digested in the intestines. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22: 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegand, R. O. 1991. Tree leaves in the diets of small ruminants. M.Sc. thesis, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Young, E. G. and Conway, C. F. 1942. On the estimation of allantoin by the Rimini-Schryver reaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry 142: 839–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar