Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:34:27.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of water allowances for the bacon pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. W. Holme  and
K. L. Robinson
D. W. Holme
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
K. L. Robinson
Affiliation:
Queen's University of Belfast
Get access

Summary

The results of two experiments, involving 72 individually fed pigs during a growing period between about 40 and 200 lb. live-weight, indicated that a water allowance of 1½ lb. per 1 lb. meal in place of 2½ lb. water had little effect on the performance of the pigs or on carcass measurements. With unrestricted water there were considerable differences in intakes between experiments but these were without significant effects on the criteria studied, when compared with the respective fixed water to feed ratios.

In the first experiment, but not in the second, a dietary supplement of penicillin was associated with a reduced voluntary intake of water. The penicillin was without overall effect on performance or carcass composition, but was associated with a significant growth response up to 100 lb. live-weight in the first experiment.

In both experiments females were less fat than castrates, as indicated by significantly different carcass densities and by some linear measurements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , October 1965 , pp. 377 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, R. S., Braude, R., & Mitchell, K. G., 1958. Water for the baconer. Pig Farming, 6: (1), 25.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., & Mitchell, K. G., 1963. Further studies on the water requirements of the growing pig. Anim. Prod., 5: 277–282.Google Scholar
Braude, R., & Johnson, B. C., 1953. Effect of aureomycin on nitrogen and water metabolism in growing pigs. J. Nutr., 49: 505–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holme, D. W., & Robinson, K. L., 1963. Some effects of dietary penicillin and zinc bacitracin on the performance of bacon pigs. Anim. Prod., 5: 251–257.Google Scholar
King, J. O. L., 1960. The effect of water intake on the response of growing pigs to an antibiotic supplement in the diet. Vet. Rec., 72: 1090–1093.Google Scholar
Leitch, I., & Thompson, J. S., 1944. The water economy of farm animals. Nutr. Abstr. Rev., 14: 197–223.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H., 1962. Comparative Nutrition of Man and Domestic Animals. Vol. 1 p. 215. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pieterse, P. J. S., 1963. The effects of feeding oxytetracycline to pigs and white rats. S. Afr. J. agric. Sci., 6: 47–53.Google Scholar
Robinson, K. L., Coey, W. E., & Burnett, G. S., 1953. The influence of procaine penicillin on the efficiency of food utilization by pigs. Chemy Ind., (1) 18–19.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. F., 1955. Animals, Fowl and Water. In Yearbook of Agriculture, p. 16, U.S.D.A., Washington. D.C.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., 1956. Statistical Methods, 5th ed.Iowa State Coll. Press, Ames, Ia.Google Scholar