Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:22:29.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the relationship between plane of nutrition during lactation and certain production characteristics in autumn-calving suckler cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. H. Somerville ,
B. G. Lowman ,
R. A. Edwards  and
G. Jolly
S. H. Somerville
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
B. G. Lowman
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
R. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
G. Jolly
Affiliation:
ARC Unit of Statistics, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

Hereford ♂ × British Friesian ♀ cows that had calved in September/October and were suckling mainly Charolais ♂ × calves were offered individually one of three planes of nutrition based on their estimated maintenance requirement during their first 150 days of lactation.

The mean daily intakes of metabolizable energy were 95·8, 71·5 and 52·1 MJ for the high, medium and low planes of nutrition respectively. Data were collected from 122 lactations. The mean 150-day cumulative milk yields of the cows were 1 355, 1 258 and 1 187 kg for the high, medium and low planes of nutrition respectively (P < 0·001). A i-kg increase in calf birth weight was associated with an increase in 150-day cumulative milk yield of 14·7 ± 2·17 kg (P < 0·001). Losses in live weight and condition score were significantly greater for cows given the low plane of nutrition during lactation (P < 0001).

Although there was a significant (P < 0·01) positive correlation between the growth rate of the calves and their dams' nutritional level during the winter there was evidence of compensatory growth at grass, since by the time of weaning in August, the plane of nutrition of the dam during the winter had no significant effect on the weight of the calves.

The experiment demonstrates that energy-deficient beef cows will attempt to maintain milk production at the expense of body reserves and that when supplementary solid food is made available to the suckled calves, their weaning weights are unaffected by the plane of nutrition of the dam during the winter.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , December 1983 , pp. 353 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council. LondonGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. D., Ball, C., Kilkenny, J. B. and Walsh, A. 1972. Suckled calves. Beef Prod. Handb., No. 3. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Ball, C., Broadbent, P. J. and Dodsworth, T. L. 1971. Energy and protein supplements for straw-based winter diets for beef cows. Anim. Prod. 13: 237–244.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1972. Effect on milk yield of the cow of the level of feeding during lactation. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 34: 265–288.Google Scholar
Brumby, P. J., Walker, D. K. and Gallagher, R. M. 1963. Factors associated with growth in beef cattle. N.Z. Jlagric. Res. 6: 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, L. L., Hauser, E. R. and Chapman, A. B. 1965. Association of preweaning and postweaning traits with weaning weight in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 652–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutscher, G. H. and Whiteman, J. V. 1971. Productivity as two-year-olds of Angus-Holstein crossbreds compared to Angus heifers under range conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 337–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drennan, M. J. 1971. Single suckled beef production. 1. Influence of stocking rate during the grazing season. creep grazing of calf and double-suckling on liveweight changes and milk production of cows. Ir. J. agric. Res. 10: 287–295.Google Scholar
Drewry, K. J., Brown, C. J. and Honea, R. S. 1959. Relationships among factors associated with mothering ability in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 938–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economides, S. J., Miller, T. B., Topps, J. H., Gelman, A. L. and Keith, D. G. 1973. A preliminary study of the milk production, bodyweight changes and some blood characteristics of underfed beef cows. Br. vet. J. 129: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleddie, V. M. and Berg, R. T. 1968. Milk production in range beef cows and its relationship to calf gains. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyns, J. 1960. The growth of the Afrikaner calf in relation to the production and composition of the milk of its dam. II. The milk production of the dam and growth of the calf. S. Afr. J. agric. Sci. 3: 517–530.Google Scholar
Kropp, J. R., Stephens, D. F., Holloway, J. W., Whiteman, J. V., Knori, L. and Totusek, R. 1973, Performance on range and in drylot of two-year-old Hereford, Hereford × Holstein and Holstein females as influenced by level of winter supplementation. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 1222–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamond, D. R., Holmes, J. H. G. and Haydock, K. P. 1969. Estimation of yield and composition of milk produced by grazing beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 606–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1980. Genstat V, Mark 4.03. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Edwards, R. A., Somerville, S. H. and Jolly, G. M. 1979. The effect of plane of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of beef cows. Anim. Prod. 29: 293–303.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A. and Somerville, S. H. 1973. Condition scoring of cattle. Bull. E. Scotl. Coll. Agric., No. 6.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1973. Breed comparisons in suckler herds. Beef Improvement Services, Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. 1968. Serial factorial design. Biomelrika 55: 67–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russel, A. J. F., Peart, J. N., Eadie, J., MacDonald, A. J. and White, I. R. 1979. The effect of energy intake during late pregnancy on the production from two genotypes of suckler cow. Anim. Prod. 28: 309–327.Google Scholar
Rutledge, J. J., Robison, O. W., Ahlschwede, W. T. and Legates, J. E. 1971. Milk yield and its influence on 205-day weight of beef calves. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 563–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somerville, S. H. 1977. Nutrition of the lactating beef cow. Ph.D Thesis, Univ. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Somerville, S. H. and Lowman, B. G. 1980. A comparison of machine-milking and the calf-suckling technique as methods of measuring the milk yield of beef cows. Anim. Prod. 30: 365–372.Google Scholar
Somerville, S. H., Lowman, B. G. and Deas, D. W. 1979. The effect of plane of nutrition during lactation on the reproductive performance of beef cows. Vet. Rec. 104: 95–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, A. G. D., Runcie, K. V., Lowman, B. G., Rowbottom, J. D. and Smith, R. S. 1972. Suckled calf production. Bull. E. Scotl. Coll. Agric, No. 4.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. L., Gillooly, J. E., Rugh, M. C., Thompson, C. E. and Purdy, H. R. 1969. Effects of energy intake, cow body size and calf sex on composition and yield of milk by Angus-Holstein cows and the preweaning growth rate of progeny. J. Anim. Sci. 28: 789–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, P. D. P. 1969. Factors affecting the shape of the lactation curve in cattle. Anim. Prod. II: 307–316.Google Scholar