Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:55:54.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on degradation and outflow rate of protein supplements in the rumen of dry and lactating Chios ewes and Damascus goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Hadjipanayiotou ,
A. Koumas ,
E. Georghiades  and
D. Hadjidemetriou
M. Hadjipanayiotou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
A. Koumas
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
E. Georghiades
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
D. Hadjidemetriou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access

Abstract

Outflow rate of small particles from the rumen of dry and lactating Chios ewes and Damascus goats were measured in two separate trials using Cr-treated soya-bean meal (SBM). In another trial, the in situ degradation of fish meal (FM) and SBM in the rumen of Chios ewes and Damascus goats were measured. Outflow rate (per h) of small particles from the rumen of the two species was similar but higher outflow rates were observed in lactating than in dry animals (dry ewes 0·054, lactating ewes 0·086, dry goats 0·057, lactating goats 0·081). With the exception of dry-matter degradability of SBM at 6-h incubation periods there were no significant differences between ewes and goats in crude protein or dry-matter degradability of both supplements at all incubation intervals. Degradation measurements at various incubation periods and effective degradation values were different between supplements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 243 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Supplement No. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Binnerts, W. T., Van'Klooster, A.TH. and Frens, A. M. 1968. Soluble chromium indicator measured by atomic absorption in digestion experiments. Veterinary Record 82: 470.Google Scholar
Elimam, M. E. and ØRSKOV, E. R. 1981. Determination of rate of outflow of protein supplements from the rumen by measuring the rate of excretion of chromium-treated protein supplements and polyethylene glycol in the faeces. Animal Production 32: 386 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Elimam, M. E. and ØRSKOV, E. R. 1984. Factors affecting the outflow of protein supplements from the rumen. 1. Feeding level. Animal Production 38: 45–51.Google Scholar
Elimam, M. E. and ØRSKOV, E. R. 1985. Factors affecting the fractional outflow of protein supplements from the rumen. 3. Effects of frequency of feeding, intake of water induced by the addition of sodium chloride and the particle size of protein supplements. Animal Production 40: 309–313.Google Scholar
Evans, E. 1981a. An evaluation of the relationships between dietary parameters and rumen liquid turnover rate. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61: 91–96.Google Scholar
Evans, E. 1981b. An evaluation of the relationships between dietary parameters and rumen solid turnover rate. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61: 97–103.Google Scholar
Ganev, G., Ørskov, E. R. and Smart, R. 1979. The effect of roughage or concentrate feeding and rumen retention time on total degradation of protein in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93: 651–656.Google Scholar
Goetsch, A. L. and Owens, F. N. 1984. Effects of dietary concentrate level and alternating the level of concentrate on digestion and passage rate in cattle fed mixed diets. Nutrition Reports International 30: 1209–1219.Google Scholar
Guada vallepuga, J. A., Castrillo Gonzalez, C., Vega Garcia, A. and Gasa Gaso, J. 1986. Rumen outflow rate estimated from the decline of chromium concentration in faecal and rumen samples after the dosage of sodium dichromate fish meal. Animal Production 42: 471–472 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hartnell, G. F. and Satter, L. D. 1979. Determination of rumen fill, retention time and ruminal turnover rates of ingesta at different stages of lactation in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 48: 381–392.Google Scholar
Kristensen, E. S., Møller, P. D. and Hvelplund, T. 1982. Estimation of the effective protein degradability in the rumen of cows using the nylon bag technique combined with the outflow rate. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 32: 123–127.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. and Ørskov, E. R. 1977. A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88: 645–650.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Hughes-Jones, M. and Elimam, M. E. 1983. Studies on degradation and outflow rate of protein supplements in the rumen of sheep and cattle. Livestock Production Science 10: 17–24.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. A., Muller, L. D., Snyder, T. J. and Maddox, T. L. 1985. Milk production, nutrient digestion, and rate of digesta passage in dairy cows fed long or chopped alfalfa hay supplemented with sodium bicarbonate. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 868–880.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Uden, P. and Van Soest, P. J. 1984. Investigations of the in situ bag technique and a comparison of the fermentation in heifers, sheep, ponies and rabbits. Journal of Animal Science 58: 213–221.Google Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. 1981. Rate of passage of digesta through the gut of mammals and birds. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 51: 789–820.Google Scholar