Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:50:09.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Starling damage and its prevention at an openfronted calf yard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. J. Feare  and
K. P. Swannack
C. J. Feare
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Tangley Place, Worplesdon, Surrey
K. P. Swannack
Affiliation:
Bridgets Experimental Husbandry Farm, Martyr Worthy, Winchester, Hampshire
Get access

Abstract

Starlings had free access to cattle food placed in open troughs in a calf yard. During the winters 1974/75, 1975/76 and 1976/77 birds took 1·49, 1·70 and 1·991 of calf food respectively, this ranging from 6·4 to 12·4% of the food given to the calves. These losses were eliminated using enclosures made of Terylene netting or PVC strips. Both enclosures kept starlings out of the yard: the latter was more manageable to farm staff, and calves within grew significantly faster than controls, probably due to a combination of the absence of bird competition for food and the elevated temperature within the enclosed area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , June 1978 , pp. 259 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Feare, C. J. 1975. Cost of starling damage at an intensive animal husbandry unit. Proc. 8th Br. Insecticide Fungicide Conf. 1: 253–360.Google Scholar
Potts, G. R. 1967. Urban starling roosts in the British Isles. Bird Study 14: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topping, J. 1955. Errors of Observation and their Treatment. Physical Society, London.Google Scholar