Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:21:07.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some factors influencing the availability of colostrum to piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Fraser
D. Fraser
Affiliation:
Animal Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access

Abstract

Five experiments, involving the hand milking of 53 farrowing sows, examined aspects of colostrum yield during and soon after farrowing. The initial and abundant yield of colostrum from a teat (averaging 6 to 10 g/min) declined after several minutes of continuous milking. Thereafter, most colostrum was released in discrete ejections, possibly caused by discrete releases of oxytocin. Colostrum ejections varied greatly in their yield and duration, and were sometimes associated with the birth of a piglet, sounds of other sows nursing, or other factors.

Teats varied greatly in their yield. During the initial minutes of milking, the most anterior teats gave, on average, 3 to 5 times more colostrum than the most posterior teats, with a nearly monotonic decline from front to rear. However, the difference between anterior and posterior teats disappeared after several minutes of continuous milking. Stimulation of the anterior teats appeared to cause the release of more colostrum than did either the stimulation of the posterior teats or no stimulation of the udder at all. A strong sucking stimulus, applied to several teats by a milking machine, elicited a large, prolonged release of colostrum.

The results suggest that (1) much of the colostrum received by newborn piglets is obtained in discrete ejections rather than in a continuous manner; (2) appropriate stimulation of the udder by the piglets may be important to elicit maximum colostrum yield; and (3) a high initial yield from anterior teats, coupled with a higher yield when anterior teats are stimulated, may help to explain the piglets' preference for anterior positions on the udder.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , August 1984 , pp. 115 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1955. Studies on milk production of Large White pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 46: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, F. J. 1969. Studies on colostral and milk whey proteins in the sow. 1. The transition of mammary secretion from colostrum to milk with natural suckling. Anim. Prod. 11: 337–343.Google Scholar
Ellendorff, F., Forsling, M. L. and Poulain, D. A. 1982. The milk ejection reflex in the pig. J. Physioi, Lond. 333: 577–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, J. I. and Lodge, G. A. 1977. Body composition and glycogen reserves in the neonatal pig during the first 96 hours postpartum. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 57: 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D. 1973. The nursing and suckling behaviour of pigs. I. The importance of stimulation of the anterior teats. Br. vet. J. 129: 324–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D. 1975. The nursing and suckling behaviour of pigs. III. Behaviour when milk ejection is elicited by manual stimulation of the udder. Br. vet. J. 131: 416–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D. 1980. A review of the behavioural mechanism of milk ejection of the domestic pig. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 6: 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, D. A., Ludwick, T. M. and Wilson, R. F. 1962. Certain aspects of lactation performance in sows. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 883–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Winheld, C. G. and Mullaney, P. D. 1976. Within-litter variation in the performance of piglets to three weeks of age. Anim. Prod. 22: 351–357.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, L. E. 1982. Teat-order in groups of piglets reared on an artificial sow. I. Formation of teat order and influence of milk yield on teat preference. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8: 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Dividich, J. and Noblet, J. 1981. Colostrum intake and thermoregulation in the neonatal pig in relation to environmental temperature. Biol. Neonate 40: 167–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, N. J. 1982. Epimeletic and et-epimeletic behaviour of swine in the first week of lactation. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. 1957. Milking sows by machine. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 49: 127–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, G. 1963. The “teat order” and communication in young pigs. Anim. Behav. 11: 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar