Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:52:19.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some factors influencing behaviour of cattle in a slaughterhouse lairage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. S. Cockram
M. S. Cockram
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Veterinary Field Station, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG
Get access

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-seven groups of cattle were studied in a slaughterhouse lairage to determine the factors affecting their ability to rest. The cattle were studied by direct observation over one 30-min period during their first 3·5 h in the lairage. An ethogram/time budget analysis of one focal Hereford × Friesian steer or heifer per group was undertaken and the lying behaviour of the whole group was recorded. Linear regression analysis was used to examine the effect of length of time in the lairage on behaviour. The effects of source, sex, group size, space allowance and bedding were examined by a comparison of regression lines. In cattle from markets, standing and moving behaviour, and the number of aggressive interactions decreased and lying behaviour increased with time in the lairage. This was not the case in cattle coming direct from farms. In cattle from markets, steers settled down at a faster rate than heifers, and cattle kept in group sizes >5 settled down at a faster rate than those kept in group sizes ≤5. The presence of straw bedding was associated with greater lying behaviour in market heifers and in market cattle kept in group sizes ≤5 than in similar cattle without straw bedding. Cattle from markets but not those from farms started to settle down within 3·5 h of arrival in the lairage and their behaviour was affected by the social and physical environment.

Keywords

abattoirsbehaviourcattle
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , June 1990 , pp. 475 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beilharz, R. G. 1985. Innate behaviour. In Ethology of Farm Animals, Comprehensive Study of the Behavioural Features of the Common Farm Animals (ed. Fraser, A. F.), pp. 83–92. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Connell, J. 1984. International Transport of Farm Animals Intended for Slaughter. Commission of the European Communities, B–1040, Brussels.Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council. 1984. Report on the Welfare of Livestock (Red Meat Animals) at the Time of Slaughter. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Franc, Č., Bartoš, L., Hanyš, Z. and Tomeš, Z. 1988. Pre-slaughter social activity of young bulls relating to the occurrence of dark-cutting beef. Animal Production 46: 153–161.Google Scholar
Gracey, J. F. 1986. Meat Hygiene. 8th ed. Bailliere Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Grandin, T. 1980. Observations of cattle behaviour applied to the design of cattle-handling facilities. Applied Animal Ethology 6: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T. 1983. Welfare requirements of handling facilities. In Farm Animal Housing and Welfare (ed. Baxter, S. H., Baxter, M. R. and MacCormack, J. A. C.), pp. 137–149. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston.Google Scholar
Kenny, F. J. and Tarrant, P. V. 1987a. The behaviour of young Friesian bulls during social re-grouping at an abattoir. Influence of an overhead electrified wire grid. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, F. J. and Tarrant, P. V. 1987b. The physiological and behavioural responses of crossbred Friesian steers to short-haul transport by road. Livestock Production Science 17: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1974. Guidelines for export slaughterhouses Technical Bulletin, Meat and Livestock Commission, No. 13.Google Scholar
Merrick, A. W. and Sharp, D. W. 1971. Electroencephalography of resting behaviour in cattle, with observations on the question of sleep. American Journal of Veterinary Research 32: 1893–1897.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Hattingh, J. and Ganhao, M. 1988. Stress in cattle assessed after handling, after transport and after slaughter. Veterinary Record 123: 201–205.Google Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y. 1975. The hypnogram as an index of adaptation of farm animals to changes in their environment. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D. B. 1980. Stress and its measurement in domestic animals: a review of behavioural and physiological studies under field and laboratory situations. Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine 24: 79–210.Google ScholarPubMed
Tennessen, T., Price, M. A. and Berg, R. T. 1985. The social interactions of young bulls and steers after re-grouping. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 14: 37–47.Google Scholar
Van Logtestijn, J. G. and Romme, A. M. C. S. 1981. Animal welfare in relation to transport, lairage and slaughter in cattle (a review). In The Problem of Dark-cutting in Beef (ed. Hood, D. E. and Tarrant, P. V.), pp. 170–183. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, S. 1985. Applied Linear Regression. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar