Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:31:47.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some consequences of high flock prolificacy in an intensive grassland sheep production system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. G. Boaz  and
W. M. Tempest
T. G. Boaz
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds
W. M. Tempest
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

An intensive sheep production system using flocks of 100 Scottish Halfbred (SHB), 100 Welsh Speckleface (WSF) and 100 Finn Blackface (FBF) ewes maintained by 8, 4 and 6 ha grassland respectively for a 5-year period, was investigated to establish the consequences of high flock prolificacy and the measures taken to achieve it, including PMS administration. Mating occurred in late October/November at ewe: ram ratios of 25 or 33: 1. Ewes were housed in winter and fed silage, with supplementary cereals in late pregnancy. Lambs in excess of 2 (SHB) and 1 (WSF and FBF) per ewe were artificially reared and fattened indoors; ewes and lambs at grass were rotationally grazed (with forward creep grazing by the lambs). Prolificacy in the SHB breed was 225 lambs born per 100 ewes mated for untreated ewes and 237 for hormone-treated ewes; 119 and 155 respectively for WSF ewes; and 255 for FBF ewes (all untreated). Lambs sold per 100 ewes mated were: for SHB, 200 and 177; WSF, 102 and 107; FBF, 201.

Good ewe condition and heavy live weights at mating were associated with appetite problems on silage in late pregnancy; PMS injection with a failure to secure conception rates above 80% at the critical oestrus and a markedly lower prolificacy for ewes conceiving at later oestruses; mating in the middle of the breeding season and March/April lambing with slow lamb growth rates on grass in July and August. Hormone-induced high prolificacy was associated with a greater proportion of large multiple litters than natural high prolificacy, and consequent smaller lamb birth weights and more perinatal mortality. There was a significant negative regression relating fleece weight with litter size. The results suggest the existence of an optimal level of prolificacy for the system employed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 219 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boaz, T. G. 1969. A comparison of large and small ewes for fat lamb production from grass. E.A.A.P. Commission on Sheep and Goat Production, Helsinki, 1969. Paper 4/5.Google Scholar
Boaz, T. G. and Tempest, W. M. 1970. Observations of ram mating behaviour, fertility and prolificacy. AZ Europai Allattenyesztok Svovetsegenek. Evi: 333–339.Google Scholar
Bradford, G. E., Quirke, J. F. and Hart, R. 1971. Natural and induced ovulation rate of Finnish Landrace and other breeds of sheep. Anim. Prod. 13: 627–635.Google Scholar
Foot, Janet Z., Russel, A. J. F., Maxwell, T. J. and Morris, P. 1973. Variation in intake among group-fed pregnant Scottish Blackface ewes given restricted amounts of food. Anim. Prod. 17: 169–177.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1968. The physical relationships of the abdominal organs in the pregnant ewe. J. agric. Sci. Camb., 70: 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Jnr, Mason, I. L. and Robinson, T. J. 1971. Hammond's Farm Animals, p. 101. E. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Hill Farming Research Organisation (1967-1970). 5th Report. Rep. Hill Fmg Res. Org., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Land, R. B., Dickinson, A. G. and Read, J. L. 1969. The influence of seasonal variation on fertility and early body growth in sheep. Anim. Prod. 11: 251–257.Google Scholar
Large, R. V. 1970. The biological efficiency of meat production in sheep. Anim. Prod. 12: 393–401.Google Scholar
Lawson, R. A. S. and Rowson, L. E. A. 1972. The influence of ewe and offspring on litter size after egg transfer in sheep. J. Reprod. Fert. 28: 433–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, J. L. 1969. The reproductive pattern and performance of sheep. Out I. Agric. 6: 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, J. L. 1971. Some aspects of reproductive efficiency in sheep. Vet. Rec. 88: 86–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1970. Sheep Improvement Services: No. 3. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Bucks.Google Scholar
Newton, J. E. and Betts, J. E. 1968. Factors affecting litter size in the Scotch Halfbred ewe. II. Superovulation and the synchronisation of oestrus. J. Reprod. Fert. 17: 485–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palsson, H. 1962. Augmentation of fertility of Iceland ewes with PMS in successive years. J. Reprod. Fert. 3: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purser, A. F. 1969. More lamb. Rep. Anim. Breed. Res. Orgn 1969, pp. 25–31.Google Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R. and Robertson, F. W. 1953. Factors affecting multiple births in sheep. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 21: 211–224.Google Scholar
Tempest, W. M. and Boaz, T. G. 1969. Artificial rearing and indoor fattening of lambs in a farming system. Anim. Prod. 11: 280 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Tempest, W. M. and Boaz, T. G. 1972. Economic implications of artificially rearing and indoor fattening of lambs in an intensive system of sheep production. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 1972: 133 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Thomas, R. J. and Boag, B. 1971. Pasture management and parasitism in the lamb crop. Outl. Agric. 6: 232–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, T. and Bryant, M. J. 1973. The influence of mating behaviour in the sheep on fertility at a progestagen-synchronized oestrus. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 1973: 81 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. 1970a. Effects of nutritionin late pregnancy on subsequent milk production in ewes. Anim. Prod. 12: 23–36.Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. 1970b. Growth of weaned lambs at pasture. Vet. Rec. 86: 368–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed