Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:15:57.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selection of sheep for response to Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae: genetic parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Get access

Abstract

Data were analysed from a long-term selection experiment with Merino sheep, based on immunological responsiveness to the intestinal nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis. For the first 14 years of selection, the criterion was the mean of five fortnightly faecal worm-egg counts (FECs) of pen-housed lambs that were vaccinated with irradiated larvae then challenged with normal T. colubriformis larvae. For most of the lambs born in the subsequent 6 years, the selection criterion was the mean of three weekly FECs of grazing lambs following a secondary challenge with T. colubriformis larvae. Data from 2233 lambs were included in the analyses.

At the end of the experiment, the lines selected for high and low response to challenge differed by 2·3 to 2·9 phenotypic standard deviations. The heritability of average pen-tested FEC was 0·38 (s.e. 0·04), similar to that for average FEC after secondary field challenge (0·37, s.e. 007). Average FECs from the primary field challenge were less heritable (0·21, s.e. 006). Counts recorded on pen-tested animals at 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 weeks after infection were all highly correlated genetically (estimates 0·93 to 0·99) and of similar heritability (0·33 to 0·39) with a non-significant tendency for later FECs to be more heritable. Phenotypic correlations were lower, ranging from 0·60 for counts 8 weeks apart, to 0·78 to 0·81 for adjacent samples 2 weeks apart. Single-record heritability estimates at 3, 4 and 5 weeks after secondary infection in grazing lambs did not differ statistically from each other but were highest at the 5th week after infection at 0·33 (s.e. 007).

FECs determined in pens were imperfectly correlated with FECs determined at pasture (genetic correlation 0·72, s.e. 013). Phenotypic correlations of single-record FECs across primary and secondary field challenges were low (around 0·2), although the genetic correlation between mean primary FEC and mean secondary FEC was not significantly different from unity. Testing under standardized conditions in pens did not result in consistently higher heritabilities than testing immunologically primed lambs at pasture. Repeated measurement in a breeding programme offers little additional benefit, except when lambs have had ample prior experience of parasite infection, with the two measures separated by an anthelmintic treatment. If an objective of a Merino breeding programme is to reduce FEC under field conditions, then using one measure in the field, approximately 3 to 5 weeks after a secondary artificial infection, is likely to lead to long-term progress.

Type
Breeding and genetics
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barger, I. A. and Dash, K. M. 1987. Repeatability of ovine faecal egg counts and blood packed cell volumes in Haemonchus contortus infections. International Journal for Parasitology 17: 977980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, S. C., Bairden, K., McKellar, Q. A., Park, M. and Stear, M. J. 1996. Genetic parameters for faecal egg count following mixed, natural, predominantly Ostertagia circumcincta infection and relationships with live weight in young lambs. Animal Science 63: 423428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dineen, J. K., Gregg, P. and Lascelles, A. K. 1978. The response of lambs to vaccination at weaning with irradiated Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae: segregation into ‘responders’ and ‘non-responders’. International Journal for Parasitology 8: 5963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eady, S. J., Woolaston, R. R., Mortimer, S. I., Lewer, R. P., Raadsma, H. W., Swan, A. A. and Ponzoni, R. W. 1996. Resistance to nematode parasites in Merino sheep: sources of genetic variation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47: 895915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics, third edition. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, UK.Google Scholar
Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J. and Thompson, R. 1999. ASREML reference manual. NSW Agriculture biometric bulletin no. 3.Google Scholar
Gregg, P., Dineen, J. K., Rothwell, T. L. W. and Kelly, J. D. 1978. The effect of age on the response of sheep to vaccination with irradiated Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae. Veterinary Parasitology 4: 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. A., Vlassoff, A., Bisset, S. A., Baker, R. L., Watson, T. G., West, C. J. and Wheeler, M. 2000. Continued selection of Romeny sheep for resistance or susceptibility to nematode infection: estimates of direct and correlated responses. Animal Science 70: 1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windon, R. G. 1991. Resistance mechanisms in the Trichostrongylus selection flocks. In Breeding for disease resistance in sheep (ed. Gray, G. D. and Woolaston, R. R.), pp. 7786. Australian Wool Corporation, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Windon, R. G., Dineen, J. K. and Kelly, J. D. 1980. The segregation of lambs into ‘responders’ and ‘non-responders’: response to vaccination with irradiated Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae before weaning. International Journal for Parasitology 10: 6573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windon, R. G., Dineen, J. K. and Wagland, B. M. 1987. Genetic control of immunological responsiveness against the intestinal nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis in lambs. In Merino improvement programs in Australia (ed. Mc, B. J.Guirk), pp. 371375. Australian Wool Corporation, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Woolaston, R. R. and Baker, R. L. 1996. Prospects of breeding small ruminants for resistance to internal parasites. International Journal for Parasitology 26: 845855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolaston, R. R. and Piper, L. R. 1996. Selection of Merino sheep for resistance to Haemonchus contortus: genetic variation. Animal Science 62: 451460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar