Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:42:36.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses to variations in dietary energy intakes by growing pigs 2. The effects on feed conversion efficiency of changes in level of intake above maintenance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. L. Davies
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
I. A. M. Lucas
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access

Summary

Allowances of about 1·4M, 1·8M, 2·2M, 2·6M, 3·OM, and 3·4M (M = feed required for maintenance) were compared for pigs growing over the live-weight ranges 20·40, 40·60, 60·80, and 80·100 kg, with feed conversion efficiency (FCE) as the main response criterion.

Response to increased digestible energy (DE) allowance was curvilinear; FCE improved rapidly up to 2·2M-2·6M, and changed much less with intakes above 2·6M. It is concluded that optimum FCE occurs at about 2·7M for pigs of 30 kg and at about 3·OM for pigs of 50, 70 and 90 kg.

Allowances of dietary DE suggested by the Agricultural Research Council correspond to 2·56M, 2·95M, 3·04M and 3·08M for pigs of 30, 50, 70 and 90 kg live weight, respectively. It appears that these are near to the optima in promoting the best FCE.

Changes of −25%, −15%, −5%, +5% and +15% in daily intake around the optimum levels caused FCE to deteriorate by averages of about 13%, 4·5%, <1%, <1% and 4·5% respectively. Daily weight gains would then change by about −34%, −18%, −5%, +4% and +10%, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3. Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Davies, J. L. and Lucas, I. A. M. 1972. Response to variations in energy intakes by growing pigs. 1. Estimates of DE and ME requirements for maintenance. Anim. Prod. 15: 115116.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. 1967. Practical implications of some genetic and environmental influences on growth and development in pigs. In Proc. 14th Easter Sch. agric. Sci., Univ. Nott., pp. 466497. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Vanschoubroek, F., De Wilde, R. and Lampo, PH. 1967. The quantitative effects of feed restriction in fattening pigs on weight gain, efficiency of feed utilisation and backfat thickness. Anim. Prod. 9: 6774.Google Scholar