Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:28:27.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rearing of colostrum-deprived piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. C. Perry  and
J. G. Lecce
G. C. Perry
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, U.S.A.
J. G. Lecce
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, U.S.A.
Get access

Extract

1. Four treatments were employed in the rearing of colostrum-deprived piglets from birth to 14 days of age. The performance of the artificially reared piglets was compared with that of conventionally raised sow-suckled piglets.

2. Statistically significant differences in growth rate were found in favour of piglets receiving 22% cows' milk solids from birth when compared with the sow-suckled group and the other artificial treatments.

3. Small non-significant differences in feed conversion efficiency were found between the artificial treatments with one exception. Pigs receiving 22% cows' milk solids from birth possessed superior conversion figures when compared with pigs receiving 6% cows' milk solids after birth.

4. Each of the artificial treatments led to fewer deaths than the sow-suckled group.

5. Pigs on the artificial treatments did not undergo such rapid changes of serum protein profile as did the sow-suckled piglets. Serum protein values for the pigs on the artificial treatments rose from approximately 33% of the levels in the sow-suckled group at two days of age to approximately 60% at 14 days of age.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 1968 , pp. 433 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braude, R. 1954. Pig nutrition. In Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals, Vol. 1, pp. 40–105. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Lecce, J. G. and Matrone, G. 1960. Porcine neonatal nutrition: the effect of diet on blood serum proteins and performance of the baby pig. J. Nutr. 70: 13–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lecce, J. G., Matrone, G. and Morgan, D. O. 1961. Porcine neonatal nutrition: absorption of unaltered non-porcine proteins and polyvinylpyrrolidone from the gut of piglets and the subsequent effect on maturation of the serum protein profile. J. Nutr. 73: 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, R. F., Segre, D. and Myers, W. L. 1964. The immunologie behaviour of baby pigs. IV. Intestinal absorption and persistence of 6.6S and 18S antibodies of ovine origin and their role in the immunologie competence of baby pigs. J. Immunol. 93: 576–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, G. A. 1958. The energy requirements of lactating sows and the influence of level of food intake upon milk production and reproductive performance. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53: 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburg, O. and Christian, W. 1942. Isolierung und Kristallisation des Gärungsferments Enolase. Biochem. Z. 310: 384–421.Google Scholar