Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:07:33.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pre-weaning mortality and productivity indices for goats and sheep on a Masai group ranch in south-central Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. T. Wilson ,
C. P. Peacock  and
A. R. Sayers
R. T. Wilson
Affiliation:
Small Ruminant and Camel Group, International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
C. P. Peacock
Affiliation:
Small Ruminant and Camel Group, International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
A. R. Sayers
Affiliation:
Small Ruminant and Camel Group, International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Abstract

In an examination of the productivity of goats and sheep on a Masai group ranch in Kenya, estimated least-squares means for pre-weaning mortality were 28·6% for goats and 32·1% for sheep. Three productivity indices based on total live weight of young produced per female per year, per kg female per year and per kg metabolic weight per year gave values of 11·1 kg, 410 g and 0·99 kg for goats and 14·1 kg, 473 g and 1·18 kg for sheep. The effects of environmental variables on these indices, the comparative advantage accruing to the variables, mortality, reproductive success and weight gain were used to construct a proposed set of interventions for the improvement of small ruminant production in south-central Kenya.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 201 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Harvey, W. R. 1977. User's guide for least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Trail, J. C. M. and Gregory, K. E. 1982. Production characters of the Sahiwal and Ayrshire breeds and their crosses in Kenya. Trop. Anim. Hlth Prod. 14: 45–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trail, J. C. M., Gregory, K. E., Marples, H. J. S. and Kakonge, J. 1982. Heterosis, additive maternal and additive direct effects of the Red Poll and Boran breeds of cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 54: 517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R. T. 1978. Livestock production on Masai group ranches. 1. A preliminary survey of the goat and sheep populations at Elangata Wuas. E. Afr. agric. For. J. 43: 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. T. 1981. Livestock production in the agro- pastoral system of central Mali. International Livestock Centre for Africa Arid and Semi-arid Zones Programme, Prog. Doc. No. AX 61.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. T. 1983. Studies on the livestock of Southern Darfur, Sudan. VIII. A comparison of productivity indices for goats and sheep. Trop. Anim. Hlth Prod. 15: 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. T., Peacock, C. P. and Sayers, A. R. 1983. Livestock production on Masai group ranches. 2. Growth and liveweight in goats and sheep at Elangata Wuas and the factors influencing them. Beitr. Trop. Landw. VetMed. 21: 191–198.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. T., Peacock, Christie and Sayers, A. R. 1984. Aspects of reproduction in goats and sheep in south-central Kenya. Anim. Prod. 38: 463–467.Google Scholar