Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:39:52.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of the true metabolizable energy concentration in forages for ruminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. J. Dewhurst ,
A. J. F. Webster ,
F. W. Wainman  and
P. J. S. Dewey
R. J. Dewhurst
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
A. J. F. Webster
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
F. W. Wainman
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
P. J. S. Dewey
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

A model has been developed to predict the true metabolizable energy (ME,) concentration in forages given to ruminants.

The chemical description of forages is based on the concentrations of ash, crude protein, ether extract, sugars and α-glycans, β-glycans and lignin, volatile fatty acids and lactic acid. The model assumes complete fermentation of sugars, α-glycans and lactic acid. The extent of fermentation of β-glycans and crude protein is determined in part by rumen solid-phase outflow rate, which can itself be predicted from dry-matter intake.

The model was tested using 121 graminaceous forages whose chemical composition and concentration of metabolizable energy had been measured in the Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit at the Rowett Research Institute. The agreement between observed and predicted ME, for all classes of forage was nearly always as good as, or better than, the best prediction from single attributes of food chemistry which could only be determined retrospectively and were not consistent even within classes of forage. The model predicts a decline in ME, with increasing rumen solid-phase outflow rate which is determined mainly by the extent of fermentation of β-glycans.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , October 1986 , pp. 183 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Supplement No. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Alderman, G. 1985. Prediction of the energy value of compound feeds In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1985 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 3–52. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelsson, J. 1949. Relation between chemical composition and nutritive value of grassland crops. Proceedings of the 5th International Grassland Congress, Noorwijk, Netherlands, pp. 266–277.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. L., Koong, L. J. and Ulyatt, M. J. 1977. A dynamic model of ruminant digestion for evaluation of factors affecting nutritive value. Agricultural Systems 2: 255–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, W. P., Adamson, A. H. and Altman, J. F. B. 1984. New methods of forage evaluation. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1984 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 161–176. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Black, J. L. and Faichney, G. J. 1981. Simulation of the effects of rumen function on the flow of nutrients from the stomach of sheep. 2. Assessment of computer predictions. Agricultural Systems 6: 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. L., Beever, D. E., Faichney, G. J., Howarth, B. R. and Graham, N. MCC. 1981. Simulation of the effects of rumen function on the flow of nutrients from the stomach of sheep. 1. Description of a computer program. Agricultural Systems 6: 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1962. The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Boyne, A. W. 1978. The estimation of the nutritive value of feeds as energy sources for ruminants and the derivation of feeding systems. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90: 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. and Anderson, F. J. 1983. Volatile fatty acid proportions and lactic acid metabolism in the rumen in sheep and cattle receiving silage diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, D. C. 1979. Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants. Volume 1. Digestive Physiology. 2nd ed. O and B Books, Oregon.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Demarquilly, C. and Henry, M. 1975. [Losses of volatile substances during estimation of dry matter of silage by oven drying.] Annales de Zootechnie 24: 743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. 1980. Measurement in sheep of the quantity and composition of rumen digesta and of the fractional outflow rates of digesta constituents. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31: 1129–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. 1986. Dynamic models, their use in understanding and predicting nutrient responses. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 45: 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M., Thornley, J. H. M., Black, J. L., Oldham, J. D. and Beever, D. E. 1984. Simulation of the metabolism of absorbed energy-yielding nutrients in young sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 52: 621–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K., Gordon, C. H., Hemken, R. W., Waldo, D. R., Van Soest, P. J. and Smith, L. W. 1972. Analytical estimates of nitrogen digestibility in heat damaged forages. Journal of Dairy Science 55: 1275–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook, United States Department of Agriculture, No. 379.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. G. and McAllan, A. B. 1980. Factors affecting microbial growth yields in the reticulo-rumen. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants (ed. Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P.), pp. 205–226. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, R., Sutton, J. D., Storry, J. E. and Brumby, P. E. 1978. Rumen microbial synthesis of long-chain fatty acids. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 38: 4A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. R., Baldwin, R. L. and Koong, L. J. 1982. Estimation of stoichiometric parameters for rumen fermentation of roughage and concentrate diets. Journal of Animal Science 55: 411–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nehring, K. 1969. Investigations on the scientific basis for the use of net energy for fattening or a measure of feeding value. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Blaxter, K. L., Kielanowski, J. and Thorbek, G.), pp. 5–20. Oriel Press, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Noble, R. C. 1978. Digestion, absorption and transport of lipids in ruminant animals. Progress in Lipid Research 17: 55–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. 1982. Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razzaque, M. A., Topps, J. H., Kay, R. N. B. and Brockway, J. M. 1981. Metabolism of the nucleic acids of rumen bacteria by preruminant and ruminant lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 45: 517–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. W., Goering, H. K. and Gordon, C. H. 1972. Relationships of forage compositions with rates of cell wall digestion and indigestibility of cell walls. Journal of Dairy Science 55: 1140–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, E. and Ørskov, E. R. 1983. The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. (1) Large-scale isolation and chemical composition of rumen microorganisms. British Journal of Nutrition 50: 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouthamer, A. H. and Bettenhausen, C. 1973. Utilisation of energy for growth and maintenance in continuous and batch cultures of micro-organisms. Biochemica et Biophysica Ada 301: 53–70.Google Scholar
Tamminga, S. 1982. Energy-protein relationships in ruminant feeding: similarities and differences between rumen fermentation and postruminal utilization. In Protein Contribution of Feedstuffs for Ruminants: Application to Feed Formulation (ed. Miller, E. L., Pike, I. H. and Es, A. J. H. Van), pp. 4–17. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Honing, Y., Steg, A. and Van Es, A. J. H. 1977. Feed evaluation for dairy cows: tests on the system proposed in the Netherlands. Livestock Production Science 4: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1982. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, pp. 75-94. O and B Books, Oregon.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Dewey, P. J. S. and Boyne, A. W. 1975. First Report of the Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit. Rowett Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Dewey, P. J. S. and Boyne, A. W. 1978. Second Report of the Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit. Rowett Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Dewey, P. J. S. and Boyne, A. W. 1981. Third Report of the Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit. Rowett Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Dewey, P. J. S. and Brewer, A. C. 1984. Fourth Report of the Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit. Rowett Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R., Smith, L. W. and Cox, E. L. 1972. Model of cellulose disappearance from the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 55: 125–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, C. J., Kitcherside, M. A. and Webster, A. J. F. 1985. Estimation of truly absorbed amino nitrogen for grass forages. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44: 153A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Osuji, P. O., White, F. and Ingram, J. F. 1975. The influence of food intake on portal blood flow and heat production in the digestive tract of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 34: 125–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, A. J. F., Simmons, I. P. and Kitcherside, M. A. 1982. Forage protein and the performance and health of the dairy cow. In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production (ed Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G.) British Society of Animal Production Occasional Publication No. 6, pp. 89–95.Google Scholar
Zinn, R. A. and Owens, F. N. 1982. Predicting net uptake of non-ammonia N from the small intestine. In Protein Requirements for Cattle (ed. Owens, F. N.), pp. 133–140. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Okla.Google Scholar