Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:20:17.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of body dimensions of Mule and Scottish Blackface ewes from measurement of body weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. J. Sharples  and
J. Dumelow
T. J. Sharples
Affiliation:
Farm Buildings Development Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Coley Park, Reading RG1 6DT
J. Dumelow
Affiliation:
Farm Buildings Development Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Coley Park, Reading RG1 6DT
Get access

Abstract

The body dimensions and live weight of 126 Mule (Bluefaced Leicester × Scottish Blackface) and Scottish Blackface ewes were measured during the 1986/87 housing season. Body dimensions included: head and neck length, body length, diagonal body length, height to withers, height to rump, girth at widest point, heart girth, width at widest point and width at shoulders. It was found that most body dimensions varied greatly with body weight. However, some body dimensions such as head length were found to be independent of weight within the weight range studied. Prediction equations are presented for each body dimensions for unshorn sheep.

These predictions can be used as a basis for the design of sheep housing, for example, trough space allowances, design of feeders or as a biological basis for space allowance.

Keywords

body measurementsbody weightScottish Blackfacesheep housing
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , June 1990 , pp. 491 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aziz, D. A., Al-Rawi, A. A. and Kazzai, N. T. 1981. Prediction of yearling weight and dimensions from weaning performance in Awassi sheep. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture 16: 29–36.Google Scholar
Bhadula, S. K., Bhat, P. and Garg, R. C. 1979. Prediction of body weight from body measurements in sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 49: 775–777.Google Scholar
Bhat, P. N., Bhat, P. P. and Garg, R. C. 1980. Note on predicting pre-weaning weights using linear body measurements in sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Science 50: 657–659.Google Scholar
Cermak, J. P. 1983. Cubicle design and dimensions. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Internal R and D report No. RD/FBS/08.Google Scholar
Kandasamy, N. and Gupta, D. C. 1983. Studies on physical measurements, live weight and fleece weight in native and cross-bred sheep in a semi-arid zone of India. Tropical Agriculture 60: 92–94.Google Scholar
Owen, J. E., Norman, G. A., Fisher, I. L. and Frost, R. A. 1977. Studies on the meat characteristics of Botswana goats and sheep. Part 1. Sampling methods and materials and measurements on the live animals. Meat Science 1: 63–85.Google Scholar
Petherick, J. C. 1982. A biological basis for the design of space in livestock housing. In Animal Housing and Welfare (ed. Baxter, S. H., Baxter, M. R. and MacCormack, J. A. C.), pp. 103–120. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Sharples, T. and Dumelow, J. 1988. Design data for sheep housing. Farm Buildings and Engineering 5: 21–23.Google Scholar
Singh, B. and Singh, M. R. 1974. Relative importance of body measurements for body weight and wool yield of Bikaneri lambs. Indian Journal of Animal Health 13: 12–14.Google Scholar