Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T12:53:58.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy of selecting bulls to breed bulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. E. Goddard
M. E. Goddard
Affiliation:
Victorian Department of Agriculture, East Melbourne, Australia
Get access

Abstract

In the breeding of dairy cattle the selection of bulls to breed young bulls for progeny testing is a crucial process. This paper compares several policies for making this selection based on the criteria-selection response, inbreeding depression, loss of genetic variance and variability of response. A number called the ‘effective number of new bulls to breed bulls selected each year’ (NBBe) is defined which is closely related to the last three of these criteria. Past studies of the design of dairy cattle breeding programmes have assumed that selection is within a group of bulls progeny tested in the same year (policy I). However, modern sire evaluation methods allow comparison of sires tested in different years. To evaluate the effect of selecting bulls to breed bulls from all available bulls (policy II) a computer simulation program was used. Policy II results in an increase in the response to selection but a substantial decrease in NBBe. When compared at the same NBBe, policy II results in a smaller selection response than policy I. A policy which allows the best bulls to be used for more than 1 year but which limits the maximum number of years for which they can be used, results in the best compromise. If bulls are to be used for several years there is little advantage to be gained from making more matings within each year to more high-rated bulls or to older, more reliably evaluated bulls.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 29 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hammond, K. 1982. The significance for genetic improvement of the number of individuals available for breeding. In Future Developments in the Genetic Improvement of Animals (ed. Barker, J. S. F., Hammond, K. and McClintock, A. E.), pp. 197–207. Academic Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. 1973. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. Proceedings of Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in Honour of Dr J. L. Lush, American Society of Animal Science/American Dairy Science Association, Champaigne, III., pp. 10–41.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. 1972. Effective size of populations with overlapping generations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 3: 278–289.Google ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G. 1974. Variability of response to selection in genetic experiments. Biometrics 30: 363–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneeberger, M., Freeman, A. E. and Boehlje, M. D. 1982. Application of Portfolio theory to dairy sire selection. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 404–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjervold, H. and Langholz, H. J. 1964. Factors affecting the optimum structure of AI breeding in dairy cattle. Zeitschrift fiir Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie 80: 25–40.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1981. Levels of investment in testing the genetic improvement of livestock. Livestock Production Science 8: 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. F., Parnell, P. F. and Hammond, K. 1984. Accounting for risk in the selection and use of sires and sons in progeny-testing programs. Proceedings of 4th Conference of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Adelaide, pp. 126–127.Google Scholar