Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:32:31.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological attributes as possible selection criteria for milk production 1. Study of metabolites in Friesian calves of high or low genetic merit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. Tilakaratne ,
J. C. Alliston ,
W. R. Carr ,
R. B. Land  and
T. J. Osmond
N. Tilakaratne
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
J. C. Alliston
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
W. R. Carr
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
R. B. Land
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
T. J. Osmond
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

The use of variation in metabolism to predict genetic merit for milk production was studied using 42 Friesian calves: 11 ♀♀, 10 ♂♂ were the offspring of four bulls with high (H), and 11 ♀♀, 10 ♂♂ of four with low (L) improved contemporary comparison (ICC) values (mean = + 402 kg and − 276 kg respectively). The animals were 14 or 15 weeks of age at the start of the study and treated similarly throughout.

Blood samples were collected: I—in relation to feeding; II—at set intervals; III—during a 44-h fast; and IV—following the sudden introduction of an energy metabolite (sodium propionate), and then refeeding. Plasma concentrations of β-hydroxybutyrate, glucose, urea, free fatty acids, total proteins and albumin were measured in all samples.

Blood characteristics apparently differed among animals, particularly protein and urea (repeatability 0·74 and 0·62 respectively).

The progeny of high ICC bulls had lower levels of urea during fasting (H = 4·70, L = 5·62 P < 0·05) but higher levels of free fatty acids (H = 578, L = 492 μ equivalents/l; P < 0·05). There was a small difference in total protein (H = 69·7, L = 66·8 g/l, P < 0·05) but the other metabolites showed no significant ICC group difference.

In general, sex of the animal did not influence the metabolites.

Results suggest that calves with different potentials for milk production vary in aspects of energy and nitrogen metabolism; the possibility of using these as criteria for genetic selection for milk production is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 1980 , pp. 327 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ash, R. W., Ennington, R. J. and Reid, R. S. 1964. The effect of short-chain fatty acids on blood glucose concentration in sheep. Biochem. J. 90: 353–360.Google Scholar
Bindon, B. M. and Turner, Helen N. 1974. Plasma LH of the prepubertal levels: a possible early indicator of fecundity. J. Reprod. Fert. 39: 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1962. The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants, p. 93. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, Valerie J. and Smith, T. 1969. Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. VIII. Effect on milk production of level of feeding at two stages of the lactation. J. agric. Sci., Comb. 72: 229–245Google Scholar
Coggins, C. R. E. and Field, A. C. 1978. Changes in plasma concentrations of glucose, free fatty acids, ketone bodies, thyroxine and insulin of lactating beef cows in relation to time of feeding and energy status. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production, Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., Occ. Publ. No. 1, pp. 41–47Google Scholar
Collier, M. 1970. An automated procedure for the simultaneous estimation of total protein and albumin in serum. J. med. Lab. Tech. 27: 86–93.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. E., Kelley, D. H., Ledet, A. E., Evans, L. E., Appell, L., Wass, W. M. and Pearson, R. E. 1978. Differences in blood constituents between genetic groups. J. Dairy Sci. 61, Suppl. 1: 82–83 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Galbraith, H., Dempster, D. G. and Miller, T. B. 1978. A note on the effect of castration on the growth performance and concentrations of some blood metabolites and hormones in British Friesian male cattle. Anim. Prod. 26: 339–342Google Scholar
Gutteridge, J. M. C. and Wright, E. B. 1968. A simple automated guaiacum glucoseoxidase method. J. Med. Lab. Tech. 25: 385–386.Google Scholar
Hart, I. C., Bines, J. A., Balch, C. C. and Cowie, A. T. 1975. Hormone and metabolite differences between lactating beef and dairy cattle. Life Sci. 16: 1285–1291Google Scholar
Hart, I. C., BINES, J. A., Morant, S. V. and Ridley, J. L. 1978. Endocrine control of energy metabolism in the cow: comparison of the levels of hormones (prolactin, growth hormone, insulin and thyrocine) and metabolites in the plasma of high- and low-yielding cattle at various stages of lactation. J. Endocr. 77: 333–345.Google Scholar
Kay, R. M., Little, W. and Kitchenham, B. A. 1976. A comparison of the growth performance and blood composition of twin and singleton calves. Anim. Prod. 22: 19–25.Google Scholar
Kitchenham, Barbara A. and Rowlands, G. J. 1976. Differences in the concentrations of certain blood constituents among cows in a dairy herd. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86: 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, R. B. 1974. Physiological studies and genetic selection for sheep fertility. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 42: 155–158.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. B. 1978. The effect of feeding pattern and sampling procedure on blood parameters. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production, Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., Occ. Publ., No. 1, pp. 99–120.Google Scholar
Little, W., Kay, R. M., Manston, R., Rowlands, G. J. and Stark, A. J. 1977. The effects of age, live-weight gain and feed intake on the blood composition of young calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 89: 291–296.Google Scholar
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. and Miller, H. 1965. Automated and manual direct methods for the determination of blood urea. Clin. Chem. 11: 624–627.Google Scholar
Morris, M. L. and Swan, H. 1975. Nutritional factors influencing milk yield in the dairy cow. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Ser.) 4: 112 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Patterson, D. S. P. 1963. Some observations on the estimation of non-esterfied fatty acid concentrations in cow and sheep plasma. Res. vet. Sci. 4: 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, G. J., Payne, J. M., Dew, Sally M. and Manston, R. 1974. Individuality and heritability of the blood composition of calves with particular reference to the selection of stock with improved growth potential. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 82: 473–481.Google Scholar
Russell, W. S. 1978. COMPREG users' guide; ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Standal, N., Vold, E., Trygstad, O. and Foss, Irene. 1973. Lipid mobilization in pigs selected for leanness or fatness. Anim. Prod. 16: 3–42.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. R. 1978. An assessment of the value of plasma urea nitrogen and albumin concentrations as monitors of the protein status of sheep. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production, Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., Occ. Publ. No. 1, pp. 143–154.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. K., MACDONALD, D. C. and Warren, R. W. 1978. Multiple blood analysis of dairy cows as a management aid. Rep. N. Scotl. Coll. Agric.Google Scholar
Treacher, R. J. 1978. Dietary protein levels and blood composition of dairy cattle. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production, Br. Soc Anim. Prod., Occ. Publ. No. 1, pp. 133–142.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1978. Body size, body composition and the efficiency of growth. In Proc. Br. Poultry Breeders' Round Table, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
Zivin, J. A. and Snarr, J. F. 1973. An automated colorimetric method for the measurement of 3-hydroxybutyrate concentration. Analyt. Biochem. 52: 456–461.Google Scholar