Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:44:33.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A performance test of pigs according to a modified Kielanowski system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. W. M. Merks ,
R. A. Donker ,
E. W. Brascamp  and
G. A. J. Buiting
J. W. M. Merks
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production, Schoonoord, PO Box 501, 3700 AM Zeist, The Netherlands
R. A. Donker
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production, Schoonoord, PO Box 501, 3700 AM Zeist, The Netherlands
E. W. Brascamp
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production, Schoonoord, PO Box 501, 3700 AM Zeist, The Netherlands
G. A. J. Buiting
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production, Schoonoord, PO Box 501, 3700 AM Zeist, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

A performance test of pigs was conducted according to an adapted version of the ‘Kielanowski system’ in which the feeding level and the termination point of the test period were changed. A total of 119 pigs of six genotypes (participants in the Commercial Pig Evaluation in The Netherlands, 1981) averaging 22 kg weight, were fed for 17 weeks on a scheme according to days on test. The regime was such that not all the pigs could consume their total allocation of food. The fast-growing pigs were expected to be more efficient and therefore the leanest.

Forty-eight pigs consumed their total food allocation, whereas the remainder left an average of 5·89 kg food. Pigs that consumed their total allocation of food had a significantly better food conversion ratio (0·07 kg/kg; P < 0·01) and a higher daily gain (33 g/day), but they had significantly less lean (10 g/kg; P < 0·05) in their carcasses than pigs that could not consume their whole allocation. The ranking of genotypes for average daily food intake closely agreed (rs = 0·94) with the ranking in another trial with ad libitum feeding, which points to the possibility for selection on food intake capacity in the proposed system. For the other variates, the ranking correlations were moderate.

Among the pigs that consumed the total amount of food offered, a moderately strong relation (r = 0·70) was found between daily gain and lean tissue growth rate. With the system tested, it was not possible to determine leanness simply by weighing the pigs afterwards. Nevertheless, the results of the modified Kielanowski system show some interesting aspects which contribute to the design of a test system for a genetically unbiased comparison among pigs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 303 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bergström, P. L. and Kroeske, D. 1968. Methods of carcass assessment in research on carcass quality in The Netherlands. I: Description of methods. 19th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Dublin.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. 1979. Development of uniform methods for pig carcass classification in the EC. Series Information on Agriculture 1979 No. 70. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Fandrejewski, H., Kotarbinska, M. and Walach-Janiak, M. 1985. [A comparison of the gilts tested to the constant age or live weight.] Rocznik Nauk Rolniczych B 102: 7–16.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R., Bichard, M. and Pease, A. 1976. Objectives in pigs breeding. Animal Production 23: 365–387.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Yen, H. T. and Lin, H. S. 1974. The growth and body composition of pigs of two genotypes on different nutritional regimes. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (New Series) 3: 86 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1977. User's guide for LSML 76. Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Columbus, (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Kielanowski, J. 1968. The method of pig progeny testing applied in Poland. Part 1. General principles and physiological background. 19th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Dublin.Google Scholar
Llndhé, B., Averdunk, G., Brascamp, E. W., Duniec, H., Gajic, I. M., Legault, G. and Steane, D. E. 1980. Estimation of breeding value in pigs. Report of a working group of the commission on animal genetics. Livestock Production Science 7: 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Lister, D., Wood, J. D. and Wolynetz, M. S. 1978. Age, weight or total feed intake as bases for the performance testing of growing pigs. Animal Production 27: 345–354.Google Scholar
Merkus, G. S. M. 1978. IVO-standaarduitsnijmethode voor varkens. Zeist. IVO-rapport C-338.Google Scholar
National Pig Breeding Organisation of Herdbook Societies and Breeding Companies. 1979–1981, 1981. Commercial pig evaluation in The Netherlands. Research Institute for Animal Production “Schoonoord”, Zeist, Report B-180.Google Scholar
Walstra, P. 1980. Growth and carcass composition from birth to maturity in relation to feeding level and sex in Dutch Landrace pigs. Communications, Agricultural University, Wageningen 80–4, pp. 58–61.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J. and Curran, M. K. 1986. Selection regime by production system interaction in pig improvement: a review of possible causes and solutions. Livestock Production Science 14: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar