Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:47:39.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of young steers offered stack-treated ammoniated hay or untreated hay with or without a supplement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Gibb  and
R. D. Baker
M. J. Gibb
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
R. D. Baker
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was designed to establish the growth response of young housed steers to the feeding of stack-ammoniated low-quality hay, and to a range of different supplements for 16 weeks, and any carry-over effects during the following 24 weeks at pasture. Ammoniated hay was offered alone (TA), or with daily supplements of either 0·75 kg barley (TLB), 1·50 kg barley (THB), 0·1125 kg fish meal (TF), 0·75 kg or 1·50 kg of a barley-based concentrate (TLC and THC, respectively). Untreated hay was offered with either urea (UU) or with a daily supplement of 0·75 or 1·50 kg concentrates (ULC and UHC respectively).

Ammoniation increased the total nitrogen concentration of the hay from 13·4 to 24·2 g/kg dry matter, and resulted in a small increase in the organic matter digestibility measured in vivo (0·597 to 0·653), compared with that measured in vitro (0·572 to 0·667). Digestibilities of the fibre fractions, measured in vivo, were also increased by ammoniation (0·626 to 0·734, 0·637 to 0·761, 0·678 to 0·771 for acid-detergent fibre, neutral-detergent fibre and cellulose, respectively). Intakes of hay were reduced by supplementation, with the exception of TF, although total intakes were increased. During the housed period, live-weight gains of steers given ammoniated hay were 0·58, 0·71, 0·81, 0·69, 0·80, 0·86 kg/day for treatments TA, TLB, THB, TF, TLC, THC, respectively. The live-weight gains of steers offered the untreated hay were 0·49, 0·66, 0·87 kg/day for treatments UU, ULC, UHC, respectively. There was no carry-over effect of treatments on live-weight gains over the grazing season (mean 0·66 kg/day). It is concluded that when high levels of supplementation are available, no benefit is to be gained by ammonia treatment of ihe hay. However, without supplementation stack ammoniation of hay produces a marked improvememt in performance, compared with the addition of urea at feeding.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 223 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. Requirements for protein. In The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, pp. 121–181. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Zwaenepoel, P., Komar, A. and Aboulfaraj, S. 1984. Feeding value of ammonia-treated hays. Annales de Zootechnie 33: 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. and Baker, R. D. 1987. Performance of young steers offered silage or thermo-ammoniated hay with or without a fish-meal supplement. Animal Production 45: 371–381.Google Scholar
Knipfel, J. E., McLeoij, J. G. and McCaig, R. N. 1983. Nutritional value of foods and feeds of plant origin: relationship to composition and processing. In The Maillard Reaction in Foods and Nutrition (ed. Waller, G R. and Feather, M. S.), American Chemical Society, Symposium No. 215, Washington, DC, 361–377.Google Scholar
Moore, K. J., Lechtenberg, V. L. and Hendrix, K. S. 1985. Quality of orchardgrass hay ammoniated at different rates, moisture concentrations, and treatment durations. Agronomy Journal 77: 67–71.Google Scholar
Perdok, H. B. 1985. Ammoniation sometimes produces dangerous feed. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, 1985 (ed. Cumming, R. B.), Paper no. 31. University of New England Publishing Unit, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Perdok, H. B. and Leng, R. A. 1985. Hyperexcitability in cattle fed (thermo-)ammoniated rice straw or wheat crop. Proceedings of the Asian-Australian Association Animal Production Animal Science Congress (1985), pp 357–366. Korea Feed Information Centre, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar