Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:40:03.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performance of young steers offered silage or thermo-ammoniated hay with or without a fish-meal supplement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Gibb
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
R. D. Baker
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to examine the performance of young steers given basal diets of either silage or ammoniated hay ad libitum, with or without a daily supplement of fish meal, equivalent to 0·75 g/kg live weight, over 16 weeks. Serial slaughter of animals was carried out to examine changes in body composition during the winter feeding period and the subsequent grazing season.

There was no difference in the intakes of hay and silage organic matter over the 16 weeks of treatment. Despite the increased intake of nitrogen on the ammoniated-hay diet there was no increase in the rate of protein gain. By turn-out the steers given silage had higher empty body and carcass weights, and greater contents of fat and energy. The increased rates of empty body-weight, carcass, protein, water and energy gains achieved when the supplement was given were similar for both basal diets. There was no effect of winter feeding treatment on changes in body composition during the grazing period, so that at the end of the summer period the silage-fed animals still had heavier empty body and carcass weights. Attention is also drawn to the possible dangers of feeding hay treated with anhydrous ammonia at high temperatures to such cattle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. Requirements. for energy. In The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, pp. 73119. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Association of Official, Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 10th ed. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, N., Ciszuk, P., Kaspersson, A. and Lingvai.L, P. 1985. [Ammonia and urea as preservatives for hay and straw.] Meddelande, Jordbrukslekniska Institutet, No. 408.Google Scholar
Cammell, S. B., Beever, D. E., Skelton, K. V. and Spooner, M. C. 1981. The construction of open-circuit calorimeters for measuring gaseous exchange and heat production in sheep and young cattle. Laboratory Practice 30: 115119.Google Scholar
Dukes, H. H. 1947. The Physiology of Domestic-Animals. Comstock, New York.Google Scholar
Gotlib, V. G., Iskrin, V. V. and Yulin, B. E. 1984. The technology of preserving moist hay. Zhivotnovodstvo No. 6, pp. 2123.Google Scholar
Harris, S. J. and Miller, B. L. 1985. Anhydrous ammonia treated hay in rations for backgrounding fall weaned calves. In Forages: the Keystone of Agriculture, pp. 266268. American Forage and Grassland Council, Lexington, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, C. R. 1976. The effect of season of harvest on the utilization by young cattle of dried grass given alone or as a supplement to grass silage. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, P. 1984. The control of silage fermentation. Hannah Research Institute Report1983, pp. 5967.Google Scholar
Moorf, K. J., Lechtenberg, V. L. and Hfndrix, K. S. 1985. Quality of orchardgrass hay ammoniated at different rates, moisture concentrations, and treatment durations. Agonomy Journal 77: 6771.Google Scholar
Moore, K. J., Lechtfnberg, V. L., Hendrix, K. S. and Hfrtfi, J. M. 1981. Improving hay quality by ammoniation. Proceedings of the 14th International Grassland Congress, Lexington, pp. 626628.Google Scholar
Pehrson, B. 1985. [Poisoning of cattle by ammonia-treated hay]. Svensk Veterinartidning 37: 537541.Google Scholar
Perdok, H. B. and Leng, R. A. 1985. Hyperexcitability in cattle fed (thermo-) ammoniated rice straw or wheat crop. Proceedings of the Asian-Australian Association of Animal Production. Animal Science Congress (1985), pp. 357366. Korea Feed Information Centre, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
Pettinati, J. D. and Swift, C. E. 1975. Rapid determination of fat in meat and meat products by Foss-let solvent extraction and density measurement. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 58: 11821187.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. and Thomas, P. C. 1986. Factors affecting the nutritive value of grass silages. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1986 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 223256. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Thorlacius, S. O. and Robertson, J. A. 1984. Effectiveness of anhydrous ammonia as a preservative for high-moisture hay. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64: 867880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, L. R., Nelson, B. D. and Montgomery, C. R. 1985. Ammonia to preserve high-moisture hay. Louisiana Agriculture 28: 2022.Google Scholar
Ward, M. G. and Ward, J. K. 1985. Ammoniation of warm-season grass hays for gestating beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 61: Suppl. 1, pp. 356357.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K. and Tetlow, R. M. 1984. The effect of anhydrous ammonia and moisture content on the preservation and chemical composition of perennial ryegrass hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 11: 159166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar