Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:50:45.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of pigs given diets containing different levels of triticale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. F. Nishimuta ,
G. R. Sunki  and
D. R. Rao
J. F. Nishimuta
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, Normal, Al. 35762, USA
G. R. Sunki
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, Normal, Al. 35762, USA
D. R. Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, Normal, Al. 35762, USA
Get access

Abstract

Sixty crossbred female and male castrate pigs were randomly allocated to five treatments in which 0, 20, 40, 60 and 80% of the ground maize in grower and finisher diets was replaced by triticale on an equal weight basis.

Pigs receiving the basal maize growing diet (0% tritcale) gained less than pigs fed the triticale diets (P<0·05). Pigs given the diets in which 20% of the maize was replaced by triticale gained significantly more than those given the other diets (P<0·05). Increasing replacement in the grower diets beyond 20% resulted in a linear decrease in consumption and weight gains (P<0·05). Feed conversion was similar for all diets which contained triticale.

The basal finisher diet, and the diet with 20% of the maize replaced, promoted better feed consumption and weight gain than the diets in which 40, 60 and 80% of the maize was replaced by triticale during the finishing phase and for the entire 109-day growing-finishing period. Carcass quality grade was higher for pigs fed the basal diet and the diet in which 20% of the maize was replaced by triticale (P<0·05 ) but there were no differences in the other parameters of carcass quality, nor in the composition, cooking quality and organoleptics,. of the longissimus muscle. Fatty acid profiles of the longissimus muscle indicated that palmitic and oleic acids were significantly higher (P<0·05 ) and linoleic and palmitoleic significantly lower (P<;0·05) in pigs given the basal and 20% replacement diets than in pigs given the other diets. The results show that triticale could replace maize partially (up to 20%) in diets for pigs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , October 1980 , pp. 177 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allee, G. L. 1974. Triticale as a feed. In Triticale: First Manmade Cereal, (ed. Tsen, C. C.), pp. 272–279. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, Mn.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 10th ed.Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Baker, D. H., Katz, R. S. and Easter, R. A. 1975. Lysine requirement of growing pigs at two levels of dietary protein. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 851–856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowland, J. P. 1968. Triticale as a grain for market pigs. 47th A. Feeders' Day Rep., Dep. Anim. Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
Erickson, J. P., Miller, E. R., Elliott, F. C., Ku, P.K. and Ullrey, D. E. 1979. Nutritional evaluation of triticale in swine starter and grower diets. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 547–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrold, R. L., Dinusson, W. E., Haugse, C. N. and Buchanan, M. L. 1971. Triticale as a feed for growing-finishing swine. N. Dak. Fm Res. 28: 34–35.Google Scholar
Henrickson, R. L. 1978. Meat, Poultry and Seafood Technology p. 153. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Irvin, K. M., Swiger, L. A. and Mahan, D. C. 1975. Influence of dietary protein level on swine with different growth capabilities. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 1031–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornegay, E. T., Hedges, J. D., Webb, K. E. Jr, Thomas, H. R., Baker, D. H., Carlisle, G. R., Harmon, B. G. and Jensen, A. H. 1975. Protein and amino acid evaluation of commercially grown opaque-2 corn. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 1546–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longnecker, T. C., Langford, L. and Staggs, D. 1969. Comparison of triticale with grain sorghum as the grain in swine rations. Rep. No. 331, High Plains Res. Foundation, Plainview, Tex.Google Scholar
Mahan, D. C., Swiger, L. A., Cline, J. H. and Parrett, N. A. 1973. Efrect of varying protein levels for growing swine with a constant level for finishing. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 285–286 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
National Live Stock and Meat Board. 1969. Meat Evaluation Hand Book, pp. 46–51. National Live Stock and Meat Board, Chicago, II.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1973. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nishimuta, J. F., Reddy, C. S. and Rao, D. R. 1978. Fractionation and bioassay of toxic compound(s) from triticale grain. Nutr. Rep. int. 5: 557–562.Google Scholar
Noland, P. R., Sharp, R. N. and McGhee, R. W. 1972. Feeding value of triticale for growing and finishing swine. Arkans. Fm Res. 21:7.Google Scholar
Peryam, D. R. and Pilgram, F. J. 1957. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Fd Technol., Champaign Insert 9.Google Scholar
Rao, D. R., Johnson, W. M. and Sunki, G. R. 1976. Replacement of maize by triticale in broiler diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 17: 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, S. G., Chen, M. L. and Rao, D. R. 1975. Replacement value of triticale for corn and wheat in beef finishing rations. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 940–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. V., Rao, D. R. and Sunki, G. R. 1979. Comparison of nutritive value of maize, triticale and wheat i n broiler diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 20: 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharda, D. P., Mahan, D. C. and Wilson, R. F. 1976. Limiting amino acids in low-protein corn-soybean meal diets for growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 1175–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimada, A., Cline, T. R. and Rogler, J. C. 1974. Nutritive value of triticale for the nonruminant. J. Anim. Sci. 38: 935–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Stothers, S. C. 1970. The nutritive value of triticale for growing swine. Res. Bull. A. S. 70-1, Dep. Anim. Sci., Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg p. 23.Google Scholar
Stothers, S. C. and Shebeski, L. H. 1975. The nutritive value of triticale for growing swine. Rep. Livestock Res., Dep. Anim. Sci., Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, p. 17.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. F. 1972. The feeding value of triticale for swine. Res. Summ. 61-5, Ohio Swine Res. Inf. Rep., Ohio agric. Res. Dev. Center, Wooster, p. 25.Google Scholar