Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:52:10.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of Friesian cows with high and low breeding indexes 1. Stall feeding and grazing experiments and performance during the whole lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. Grainger ,
A. W. F. Davey  and
C. W. Holmes
C. Grainger
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
A. W. F. Davey
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
C. W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

The performance of 38 Friesian cows with either high or low breeding indexes was measured during the whole lactation and in short-term experiments where the cows were individually given cut pasture in stalls, or grazed on pasture.

Cows with high breeding indexes produced more milk fat than did cows with low breeding indexes in the short-term experiments, and during the whole lactation. There was close agreement between the expected differences (predicted from breeding indexes) and the measured differences in milk fat yield. When fresh cut pasture was given ad libitum in stalls the intake per cow was the same between genotypes. However, when intake was expressed per unit of metabolic weight, the mean pasture drymatter intake of the high breeding index cows was 1·05 of that of the low breeding index cows, but the difference was significant in only one of the four indoor feeding experiments.

The difference between genotypes in size was not regarded as significant because the differences in mean live weight at calving (high breeding index – low breeding index) of the animals purchased in the 1st and 2nd years were –28 and 9 kg respectively. During the whole lactation, low breeding index cows gained significantly more live weight and lost significantly less body condition than did the high breeding index cows. No significant differences in live-weight and body-condition changes could be detected during the shorter periods (4 to 5 weeks) of the indoor feeding and grazing experiments.

It can be calculated that the higher milk production of the high breeding index cows could be explained partly because they eat more (per unit metabolic live weight) and more importantly because they divert a higher proportion of the food they eat to milk production and a lower proportion to live-weight gain than do the low breeding index cows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , June 1985 , pp. 379 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Bock, R. 1975. Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioural Research. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, Valerie J., Clements, A. June and Smith, T. 1981. The relationship between yield of milk solids of dairy cows and response to change in plane of nutrition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 97: 643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, A. M. 1981. The efficiency of cows differing in breeding index. Proc. Ruakura Fmrs' Conf., pp. 145–148.Google Scholar
Bryant, A. M. and Trigg, T. E. 1981. Progress report on the performance of Jersey cows differing in breeding index. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 41: 39–43.Google Scholar
Carruthers, V. R. and Bryant, A. M. 1983. Evaluation of the use of chromic oxide to estimate the feed intake of dairy cows. N.Z. Jl. agric. Res. 26: 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A. H. 1964. How important is dairy merit? Proc. Ruakura Fmrs' Conf., pp. 188–202.Google Scholar
Earle, D. F. 1976. A guide to scoring dairy cow condition. J. Agric, Viet. Dep. Agric. 74: 228–231.Google Scholar
Fenton, T. W. and Fenton, Mirjana. 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and faeces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59: 631–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, C., Holmes, C. W., Bryant, A. M. and Moore, Y. 1983. A note on the concentration of energy in the milk of Friesian and Jersey cows. Anim. Prod. 36: 307–308.Google Scholar
Grainger, C., Holmes, C. W. and Moore, Y. F. 1985. Performance of Friesian cows with high and low breeding indexes. 2. Energy and nitrogen balance experiments with lactating and pregnant, non-lactating cows. Anim. Prod. 40: 389–400.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W., Davey, A. W. F. and Grainger, C. 1981. The efficiency with which feed is utilised by the dairy cow. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 41: 16–27.Google Scholar
Shannon, P. 1976. Is A.B. worthwhile? Proc. Ruakura Fmrs' Conf., pp. 76–79.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Wickham, B. W., Belsey, M. A., Jackson, R. G. and Rumball, W. 1978. Evidence of genetic improvement of New Zealand dairy cattle. N.Z. J. Exp. Agric. 6: 101–113.Google Scholar