Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:48:21.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritive value of separated milk for pigs. I. A comparison of two diets containing separated milk with a standard all-meal diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. G. Chamberlain  and
I. A. M. Lucas
A. G. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of North Wales, Bangor
I. A. M. Lucas
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access

Extract

One hundred and forty-four Large White weaner pigs were used in each of two experiments to investigate the nutritive value of liquid separated milk. Two experimental diets, one based on separated milk and barley meal, the other on separated milk, soya bean meal and barley meal were compared with control meals of the type used in the Pig Industry Development Authority's progeny testing stations. The amounts of milk in the experimental diets were adjusted so that the lysine concentrations in the dietary dry matter were similar to those of the control meals. All diets were given according to a restricted scale relating daily dry matter allowance to live weight, to a scale relating digestible energy allowance to live weight and to ‘appetite’. In the first experiment, pigs were slaughtered at 200 lb live weight, in the second at 260 lb live weight.

Pigs given the separated milk and barley meal diet performed similarly to those given the control meals; those given the separated milk, soya bean meal and barley meal diet had better feed conversion efficiencies than control pigs, particularly over the range 200 to 260 lb live weight. Pigs given diets containing milk had higher killing-out percentages and shorter carcasses than those given the control meals. Diet had no statistically significant effect on the percentages of fat and lean in the sides.

The effects of plane of nutrition were demonstrated by the faster rate of gain and poorer carcass quality of pigs fed to ‘appetite’.

It was concluded that the nutritive value of separated milk is explained by its high energy and lysine content. There was no evidence of any unknown beneficial factor in it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 1968 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3 Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London. Technical Reviews and Summaries.Google Scholar
Baird, D. M. McCampbell, H. C. and Amick, R. J. 1964. Programmed rations with varying fibre and energy levels for finishing hogs. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 866–867 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Hosking, Z. D. and Mitchell, K. G. 1960. Studies on liquid skim milk for growing pigs. The effect of its abrupt removal from the diet and of supplementation with copper sulphate or amino acids. Anim. Prod. 2: 105–115.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Hosking, Z. D. and Mitchell, K. G. 1965. The effects of different amounts of liquid skim-milk on pork pigs with particular reference to carcass quality. Anim. Prod. 7: 153–164.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1956. Formalin-treated skim milk for pigs. Agriculture (Lond.) 63: 111–114.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1962. Effect of soaking the meal ration of growing pigs in water or skim milk. Anim. Prod. 4: 313–318.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. 1960. The estimation of available lysine in animal-protein foods. Biochem. J. 77: 604–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clausen, H. 1963. The protein requirements of growing meat type pigs. Paper No. 2326/63, E.A.A.P. Study Commission on Pig Production, Rome, 29th-30th August.Google Scholar
Jones, A. S., Livingstone, D. M. S. and Cadenhead, A. 1964. The effect of protein and energy intakes at different concentrations of energy on performance in bacon pigs. Anim. Prod. 6: 259 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. 1940. Growth and development in the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characters. III. Effect of the plane of nutrition on the form and composition of the bacon pig. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 30: 511–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, A. 1963. Digestibility experiments with pigs. Beretn. Forsøgslab. København No. 337.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical Methods. 5th edition. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Ia.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. and Evans, R. E. 1948. The nutrition of the bacon pig. XII. The value of dried grass meal for growing and fattening pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 38: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar