Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:57:05.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritive value of Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) when treated with CaO, NaOH or a microbial inoculant and offered to dairy heifers as big-bale silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

A. S. Chaudhry ,
R. T. Cowan ,
B. C. Granzin  and
A. V. Klieve
A. S. Chaudhry
Affiliation:
Australian Tropical Dairy Institute, School of Animal Studies, University of Queensland, Gatton, Q4345, Australia
R. T. Cowan
Affiliation:
Australian Tropical Dairy Institute, School of Animal Studies, University of Queensland, Gatton, Q4345, Australia
B. C. Granzin
Affiliation:
Australian Tropical Dairy Institute, School of Animal Studies, University of Queensland, Gatton, Q4345, Australia Wollongbar Research Institute, NSW Agriculture, NSW2477 Australia
A. V. Klieve
Affiliation:
QDPI Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly, Q4105, Australia
Get access

Abstract

A series of laboratory and animal studies examined the use of chemical and biological agents to enhance the digestibility of Rhodes grass (grass) cut at 60 (young) and 100 (mature) days of regrowth and ensiled as big round bales. The treatments included an untreated control (C), a microbial inoculant (I), NaOH, CaO and NaOH plus inoculant (NaOH + I). Inoculant was grown anaerobically, using a starter culture of rumen fluid from cattle given Rhodes grass. Treatments C, I, NaOH, NaOH + I, were offered separately to twelve dairy heifers, in a 3 ✕ 4 randomized complete block design, repeated twice for each grass silage. C and I had substantial mould growth, compared with no visible mould in NaOH or NaOH + I. CaO treatment was effective in preventing mould growth, but had little effect on the chemical composition and in sacco digestibility of mature grass silage. NaOH reduced NDF content and increased in sacco digestibility (P < 0·05) but not the in vivo digestibility (P > 0·05) of both mature- and young-grass silage. The effects of other treatments on nutritive value were non-significant at both stages of maturity. NaOH increased the intake of mature-grass silage by 24-26% (P < 0·05), but had little effect on the intake of young-grass silage (P > 0·05). Treatment I consistently reduced grass silage intake (P < 0·05) for young-grass silage. The findings of these studies show that treating mature Rhodes grass with NaOH will improve its nutritive value and reduce mould growth in conserved herbage. However none of the treatments in this study had any consistently positive effects on the in vivo nutritive value or storage quality of young-grass silage.

Keywords

alkalisChloris gayanaheifersinoculationsilage
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , October 2001 , pp. 329 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis, 14th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Chacon, E. and Stobbs, T. H. 1976. Influence of progressive defoliation of a grass sward on the eating behaviour of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 27: 709–727.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, A. S. 1998a. Chemical and biological procedures to upgrade cereal straws for ruminant animals. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 68: 319–331.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, A. S. 1998b. In vitro and in sacco digestibility of wheat straw treated with calcium oxide and sodium hydroxide alone or with hydrogen peroxide. Animal Feed Science and Technology 74: 301–313.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, A. S. 1998c. Nutrient composition, digestion and rumen fermentation in sheep of wheat straw treated with calcium oxide, sodium hydroxide and alkaline hydrogen peroxide. Animal Feed Science and Technology 74: 315–328.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, A. S. 2000. Rumen degradation In sacco in sheep of wheat straw treated with calcium oxide, sodium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide plus hydrogen peroxide. Animal Feed Science and Technology 83: 311–321.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, A. S. and Miller, E. L. 1996. The effect of sodium hydroxide and alkaline hydrogen peroxide on chemical composition of wheat straw and voluntary intake, growth and digesta kinetics in store lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60: 69–86.Google Scholar
Chermiti, A., Teller, E., Vanbelle, M., Collignon, G. and Matatu, B. 1994. Effect of ammonia or urea treatment of straw on chewing behaviour and ruminal digestion processes in non-lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 47: 41–51.Google Scholar
Chesson, A. 1993. Mechanistic models of forage cell wall degradation. In Forage cell wall structure and digestibility (ed. Jung, H. G., Buxton, D. R., Hatfield, R. D. and Ralph, J.), pp. 374–376. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Colman, R. L. 1971. Quantity of pasture and forage crops for dairy production in the tropical regions of Australia. 1. Review of the literature. Tropical Grasslands 5: 181–194.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Lowe, K. F., Ehrlich, W., Upton, P. C. and Bowdler, T. M. 1995. Nitrogen fertilised grass in a subtropical dairy system. 1. Effect of level of nitrogen fertiliser on pasture yield and soil chemical characteristics. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35: 125–135.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Moss, R. J. and Kerr, D. V. 1993. Northern Dairy Feed base 2001. 2. Summer feeding systems. Tropical Grasslands 27: 150–161.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Breton, J., Bienaime, A. and Louyot, J. M. 1982. Study of the feeding value of sodium hydroxide treated straws. 1. Effect of sodium hydroxide treatment. Annales de Zootechnie 31: 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, G. E., McManus, W. R. and Bigham, M. L. 1971. Effect of carbon chain length upon extraction of volatile fatty acids from rumen liquor. Journal of Chromatography 63: 397–401.Google Scholar
Fahey, G. C. Jr, Bourquin, L. D., Titgemeyer, E. C. and Atwell, D. G. 1993. Post-harvest treatment of fibrous feedstuffs to improve their nutritional value. In Forage cell wall structure and digestibility (ed. Jung, H. G., Buxton, D. R., Hatfield, R. D. and Ralph, J.), pp. 715–776. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Gihad, E. A. 1979. Intake, digestibility and nutrient utilisation by sheep of sodium hydroxide-treated tropical grass supplemented with soybean or urea. Journal of Animal Science 48: 1172–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R. I., Catchpoole, V. R., Lambourne, L. J. and Kerr, J. D. 1978. The preservation of a Nandi Setaria silage and its feeding value for dairy cows. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 18: 16–24.Google Scholar
Hartley, R. D. and IIIMorrison, W. H. 1991. Monomeric and dimeric phenolic acids released from cell walls of grasses by sequential treatment with sodium hydroxide. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 55: 365–376.Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation. 1984. Dried milk. Determination of sodium, potassium and calcium contents. Flame photometric method. International IDF standard: provisional 119. Square Vergote 41, 1040, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Jung, H. G. and Allen, M. S. 1995. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 73: 2774–2790.Google Scholar
Kaiser, A. G., Havillah, E.G., Chopping, G. D. and Walker, R. G. 1993. Northern Dairy Feed base 2001. 4. Feeding systems during winter. Tropical Grasslands 27: 180.Google Scholar
Kategile, J. A., Urio, N. A., Sundstol, F. and Mzihirwa, Y. G. 1981. Simplified method for alkali treatment of low-quality roughages for use by small landholders in developing countries. Animal Feed Science and Technology 6: 133–143.Google Scholar
Keady, T. W. J. and Murphy, J. J. 1997. The effects of treating low dry matter herbage with a bacterial inoculant or formic acid on the intake and performance of lactating dairy cattle. Animal Science 64: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keady, T. W. J., Steen, R. W. J., Kilpatrick, D. J. and Mayne, C. S. 1994. Effects of inoculant treatment on silage fermentation, digestibility and intake by growing cattle. Grass and Forage Science 49: 284–294.Google Scholar
Kerr, D., Davison, T., Hetherington, G., Lake, M. and Murray, A. 1996. Queensland Dairy Farm Survey 1994-95, summary report no. Q196115, Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Klieve, A. V., Hudman, J. F. and Bauchop, T. 1989. Inducible bacteriophages from ruminal bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 55: 1630–1634.Google Scholar
Klieve, A. V., Holroyd, R. G., Turner, A. F. and Lindsay, J. A. 1998. Rumen bacterial and protozoal populations in cattle being relocated in tropical Queensland. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49: 1153–1159.Google Scholar
Kumari, S. R. and Chandrashaker, A. 1994. Isolation and purification of three antifungal proteins from sorghum endosperm. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 64: 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, M. N., Kennedy, P. M. and Minson, D. J. 1990. Resistance of leaf and stem fractions of tropical forage to chewing and passage in cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 63: 105–119.Google Scholar
Mandebvu, P., West, J. W., Froetschel, M. A., Harfield, R. D., Gates, R. N. and Hill, G. M. 1999. Effect of enzyme or microbial treatment of bermudagrass forages before ensiling on cell wall composition, end products of silage fermentation and in situ digestion kinetics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 77: 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. M., Klieve, A. V., Plumb, J. J., Aisthorpe, R. and Blackall, L. L. 1997. An in vitro cultured rumen inoculum improves nitrogen digestion in mulgafed sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48: 403–409.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J., Cowan, T. and Havilah, E. 1993. Northern dairy feedbase 2001. 1. Summer pasture and crops. Tropical Grasslands 27: 131–149.Google Scholar
Moloney, A. P. and Flynn, A. V. 1992. Growth and in vivo digestibility in cattle fed grass hay treated with urea and sodium hydroxide, alone or in combination. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 31: 1–11.Google Scholar
Playne, M. J. and McDonald, P. 1966. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 17: 264–268.Google Scholar
Poppi, D. P., Minson, D. J. and Ternouth, J. H. 1981. Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. 2. Factors controlling the retention of feed in the reticulo-rumen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32: 109–121.Google Scholar
Reeves, M., Fulkerson, W. J., Kellaway, R. C. and Dove, H. 1996. A comparison of three techniques to determine the herbage intake of dairy cows grazing Kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36: 23–30.Google Scholar
Sharma, K. 1986. Response of sheep to diets containing sodium hydroxide-treated tropical grass and groundnut-cake or urea. Indian Journal of Animal Science 56: 469–472.Google Scholar
Shaver, R. D., Nytes, A. J., Satter, L. D. and Jorgensen, N. A. 1986. Influence of amount of feed intake and forage physical form on digestion and passage of prebloom alfalfa hay in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 1545–1559.Google Scholar
Shimojo, M. and Goto, I. 1990. Improvement of nutritive value of tropical grasses by physical or chemical treatment. 2. Effect of wet treatment with sodium hydroxide on chemical composition and dry matter digestibility. Journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science 36: 191–196.Google Scholar
Spencer, R. R., Akin, D. E. and Rigsby, L. L. 1984. Preparation of potassium hydroxide-treated ‘coastal’ Bermudagrass stems at two stages of maturity. Agronomy Journal 76: 819–824.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1994. SAS/STAT software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Teather, R. M. 1982. Maintenance of laboratory strains of obligatory anaerobic rumen bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 44: 499–501.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Morrison, I. M. 1982. The chemistry of silage making. In Silage for milk production (ed. J. Rook, A. F. and Thomas, P. C.), National Institute for Research in Dairying and Hannah Research Institute, technical bulletin no. 2, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991 Methods of dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R., Smith, L. W. and Cox, E. L. 1972. Model of cellulose disappearance from the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 55: 125–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weatherburn, M. W. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 39: 971–974.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Z. G., Ashbell, G., Azrieli, A. and Brukental, I. 1993. Ensiling peas, ryegrass and wheat with additives of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and cell wall degrading enzymes. Grass and Forage Science 48: 70–78.Google Scholar