Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:36:27.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrition of the early-weaned calf. XI. Intake of diets differing in energy concentration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Kay ,
N. A. MacLeod  and
Margaret McLaren
M. Kay
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
N. A. MacLeod
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
Margaret McLaren
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
Get access

Summary

1. A growth and digestibility trial was carried out with 27 British Friesian calves given diets having either 3·1, 2·8 or 2·4 Meal metabolizable energy per kg dry matter and either the same concentration of protein or the same protein-to-energy ratio.

2. Daily dry-matter intake and rate of gain in live weight increased significantly as the energy concentration of the diet was reduced. There were no significant differences in digestible-energy intake between calves given the different diets, although the trend was the same as for dry-matter intake.

3. Both dry-matter digestibility and energy digestibility were lowest for the low-energy diet.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , August 1970 , pp. 413 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, R. P., Kay, M. and Ørskov, E. R. 1969 The effect of different dietary energy concentrations on the voluntary intake and growth of intensively fed lambs. Anim. Prod. 11:173–185.Google Scholar
Association Of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. and Campling, R. C. 1962. Regulation of voluntary food intake in ruminants. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 32: 669–686.Google ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. and Clapperton, J. L. 1965. Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 19: 511–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, M. and MacLeod, N. A. 1968. The protein requirements of early-weaned calves. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 27: 36A–37A.Google Scholar
Miller, W. J. 1962. Comparison of lard, tallow, butter and hydrogenated cottonseed oil in starters and of pelleted VS non-pelleted coastal bermuda grass hay for calves. J. Dairy Sci. 45: 759–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. J., Carmon, J. L. and Dalton, H. L. 1959. Influence of high levels of plant and animal fats in calf starters on growth, feed consumption and palatability. J. Dairy Sci. 42: 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1963. The effect of grinding, pelleting and wafering on the feeding value of roughages—a review. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 1. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 569–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, J. B., Davies, D. A. R. and Ridgman, W. J. 1968. The control of voluntary feed intake in ruminants. Proc. 2nd Wld Conf. Anim. Prod., Maryland.Google Scholar
Stobo, I. J. F., Roy, J. H. B. and Gaston, Helen J. 1967. The protein requirement of the ruminant calf. II. Further studies on the effect of protein content of the concentrate mixture on the performance of calves weaned at an early age. Anim. Prod. 9: 23–24.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Preston, T. R. and Ndumbe, R. D. 1961. The nutrition of the early weaned calf. 1. The effect on nitrogen retention of diets containing different levels of groundnut meal. Anim. Prod. 3: 121–126.Google Scholar