Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:36:34.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutrition of the early-weaned calf V. The effect of protein quality, antibiotics and level of feeding on growth and feed conversion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. G. Whitelaw ,
T. R. Preston  and
N. A. MacLeod
F. G. Whitelaw
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
T. R. Preston
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
N. A. MacLeod
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

1. A 2×2×2 factorial experiment was carried out with 8 blocks of 8 early-weaned Friesian male calves on the 8 treatment combinations of the following factors: (A) groundnut meal versus white-fish meal as the major protein source; (B) presence versus absence of antibiotic and (C) restricted versus ad lib. feeding. The experiment was conducted over the live-weight range 55–90 kg.

2. The inclusion of fish meal rather than groundnut meal in the diet resulted in highly significant increases in both rate of gain and feed conversion efficiency (P < 0·001). This effect was most apparent at the higher level of feed intake.

3. The addition of antibiotic to the diet increased rate of gain (P < 0·001) and improved feed conversion ratio (P <0·01). Feed intake was increased slightly but non-significantly (P <0.1) on the ad lib. feeding level as a result of antibiotic supplementation.

4. Feed conversion ratio was lower and feed intake and rate of gain were higher on ad lib. than on restricted feed (P < 0·001 in each instance).

5. There was a significant (P < 0·05) level of feeding × antibiotic interaction, indicating that the difference between restricted and ad lib. feeding was greater in the presence than in the absence of antibiotic. No other significant interactions were observed.

6. The use of fish meal in preference to groundnut meal is shown to be justified on economic grounds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , October 1963 , pp. 227 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asplin, F. D., & Carnaghan, R. B. A., 1961. The toxicity of certain groundnut meals for poultry with special reference to their effect on ducklings and chickens. Vet. Rec., 73: 1215.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., & Wood, W. A., 1951. The nutrition of the young Ayrshire calf. 4. Some factors affecting the biological value of protein determined by nitrogen-balance methods. Brit. J. Nutr., 5: 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blount, W. P., 1961. Turkey ‘X’ Disease. Turkeys, 9: 52.Google Scholar
Brisson, G. J., Cunningham, H. M., & Haskell, S. R., 1957. The protein and energy requirements of young dairy calves. Canad. J. Anim. Sci., 37: 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. D., & Lassiter, C. A., 1961. Protein-energy ratios for dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 45: 1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinda, P. K., 1960. Some effects of chlortetracycline on the nutrition of the early-weaned calf. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Lassiter, C. A., 1955. Antibiotics as growth stimulants for dairy cattle. A review. J. Dairy Sci., 38: 1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loosmore, R. M., & Harding, J. D. J., 1961. A toxic factor in Brazilian groundnut causing liver damage in pigs. Vet. Rec., 73: 1362.Google Scholar
Loosmore, R. M., & Markson, L. M., 1961. Poisoning of cattle by Brazilian groundnut meal. Vet. Rec., 73: 813.Google Scholar
Moir, R. J., & Somers, M., 1957. Ruminal flora studies. VIII. The influence of rate and method of feeding a ration upon the digestibility, upon ruminal function and upon the ruminal population. Aust. J. agric. Res., 8: 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R., 1956. Studies on the rearing of calves weaned from milk between two and four weeks of age. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., 1956, p. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R., Macleod, N. A., & Dinda, P. K., 1959. The effect of chlortetracycline on growth of early-weaned calves. Anim. Prod., 1: 13.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R., Whitelaw, F. G., & MacLeod, N. A., 1963. The nutrition of the earlyweaned calf. IV. Ruminal ammonia formation from soluble and insoluble protein sources. Anim. Prod., 5: 147.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B.In Scientific principles of feeding farm livestock.Proceedings of a Conference held at Brighton,1958, p. 48. Farmer and Stockbreeder Publications Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Sargeant, K., O'Kelly, J., Carnaghan, R. B. A., & Allcroft, R., 1961a. The assay of a toxic principle in certain groundnut meals. Vet. Rec., 73: 1219.Google Scholar
Sargeant, K., Sheridan, A., O'Kelly, J., & Carnaghan, R. B. A., 1961b. Toxicity associated with certain samples of groundnuts. Nature, Lond., 192: 1096.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., & Preston, T. R., 1963. The nutrition of the early-weaned calf. III. Protein solubility and amino acid composition as factors affecting protein utilisation. Anim. Prod., 5: 131.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Preston, T. R., & Dawson, G. S., 1961. The nutrition of the earlyweaned calf. II. A comparison of commercial groundnut meal, heat-treated groundnut meal and fish meal as the major protein source in the diet. Anim. Prod., 3: 127.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Preston, T. R., & Ndumbe, R. D., 1961. The nutrition of the earlyweaned calf. I. The effect on nitrogen retention of diets containing different levels of groundnut meal. Anim. Prod., 3: 121.Google Scholar