Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:10:59.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the use of sorghum as a substitute for maize in a diet for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Paula M. A. A. Serra ,
O. E. R. Olivetra  and
T. H. Fernandes
Paula M. A. A. Serra
Affiliation:
Estaçao Zootécnia Nacional (INIA), Fonte Boa, 2000 Vale de Santarém, Portugal
O. E. R. Olivetra
Affiliation:
Estaçao Zootécnia Nacional (INIA), Fonte Boa, 2000 Vale de Santarém, Portugal
T. H. Fernandes
Affiliation:
Estaçao Zootécnia Nacional (INIA), Fonte Boa, 2000 Vale de Santarém, Portugal
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was undertaken to examine the effect of using sorghum as a substitute for maize on digestibility and nitrogen retention in the growing pig. Two levels of sorghum, 200 and 400 g/kg, substituting for maize on a weight basis, were used. The chemical composition of control and test diets was similar. In the metabolism trial, digestibility coefficients for dry matter, crude fibre, nitrogen and gross energy were significantly lower for the animals given the higher level of sorghum. In the feeding trial, no significant differences were recorded between the three groups in relation to food conversion ratio, daily live-weight gain, killing-out proportion and carcass quality. It is concluded that yellow sorghum may replace up to 400 g of maize per kg in diets for growing pigs without having detrimental effects on animal performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , December 1982 , pp. 443 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chambolle, M. 1970. L'utilisation du sorgho-grain dans l'alimentation du pore. Bull. Tech. Inf. 251: 421–434.Google Scholar
Cummings, D. P. and Axtell, J. D. 1973. 10th Annual Research Progress Report of Purdue—AID Sorghum Project Entitled ‘Inheritance and Improvement of Protein Quality and Content in Sorghum Bicolor(1)’. Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind.Google Scholar
Harris, H. B. 1971. Grain sorghum production. Georgia. Res. Rep., 98. University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.Google Scholar
Schaffert, R. E., Lechtenberg, V. L., Oswalt, D. L., Axtell, J. D., Pichett, R. C. and Rhykerd, C. L. 1974. Effect of tannin in vitro dry matter and protein disappearance in sorghum grain. Crop Sci. 14: 266–273.Google Scholar
Smith, W. C., Barkes, J. N. and Tonks, H. M. 1973. The relative performance and carcass characteristics of pigs sired by Hampshire and Large White boars. Anim. Prod. 17: 59–64.Google Scholar
Smith, W. C., Tonks, H. M. and Lawrence, N. 1967. A note on the use of back rasher ratios as predictors of lean percentage in pigs of bacon weight. Anim. Prod. 9: 255–258.Google Scholar