Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:53:13.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the maintenance requirement of adult conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Martyn H. Butterworth
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Maracay
Get access

Extract

The maintenance requirement for digestible organic matter of adult sheep has been derived by Wood and Capstick (1926) and more recently by Lang-lands, Corbett, McDonald and Pullar (1963) by means of regression analysis of data for feed intake, live-weight and live-weight gain.

As data from digestibility trials carried out both in Trinidad and Venezuela were available, similar equations were derived for adult male sheep under tropical conditions. Groups of six adult male sheep were housed individually and total collections of faeces and urine were made for periods of 10 days after preliminary periods of 7 or 10 days. The quantity of forage offered was generally that which the individual sheep would eat without leaving a large residue. The results obtained in these trials and a more detailed description of the methods used have been described elsewhere (Butterworth, 1963; 1965). In all, 178 sets of data were used. Each set for an individual animal consisted of daily intake of digestible organic matter (D), the mean (W) of initial and final body weights, and daily change in weight (G) all in lb. Values of D and G were means obtained from the results for the 10-dayperiod. The value of G was subject to high error in determination as periods were short and measurement of weight change in ruminant animals over short periods is most unreliable (see for example, Lush, Christensen, Wilson and Black, 1928; Whiteman, Chambers, Loggins, Pope and Stephens, 1954). Mean values and ranges of the values were as follows: D=0·96 lb. (0·46–1·87 lb.), W=84·2 lb. (56·0–149·0 lb.) and G=0·02 lb. (-0·5-+0·5 lb.). The digestibility coefficients for the dry matter of the various forages used ranged from 47·3 to 68·0%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butterworth, M. H., 1963. Digestibility trials on forages in Trinidad and their use in the prediction of nutritive value. J. agric. Sci., 60: 60341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, M. H., 1965. Some aspects of the utilisation of tropical forages. 1. Green Elephant grass at various stages of growth. J. agric. Sci., 65: 65233.Google Scholar
Galvao, P. E., 1947. Heat production in relation to body weight and body surface. Inapplicability of the surface law on dogs of the tropical zone. Amer. J. Physiol, 148: 148478.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I., & Pullar, J. D., 1963. Estimates of the energy required for maintenance by adult sheep. 1. Housed sheep. Anim. Prod., 5: 511.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L., Christensen, F. W., Wilson, C. V., & Black, W. H., 1928. The accuracy of cattle weights. J. agric. Res., 36: 36551.Google Scholar
Whiteman, J. V., Loggins, P. F., Chambers, D., Pope, L. S., & Stephens, D. F., 1954. Some sources of error in weighing steers off grass. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 13832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, T. B., & Capstick, J. W., 1926. The maintenance requirements of the adult sheep. J. agric. Sci., 16: 16325.Google Scholar