Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T18:51:22.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the influence of a supplement of barley and dried lucerne on the intake of barley straw by cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. M. J. Horton
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
Get access

Summary

Six castrated male cattle of 350 kg live weight were used in an incomplete Latin square design to measure intake and digestibility of barley straw offered ad libitum alone and with 5 levels, 1·5 to 7·5 kg/day, of a barley and dried lucerne concentrate. Straw intake declined and total organic-matter intake increased linearly with increasing concentrate level. On average 1 kg additional organic matter as concentrate, increased total organic-matter intake by 0·68 kg. There was no evidence that the crude protein content of the whole diet affected straw consumption.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. P., Escuder-Volonte, X., Curran, M. K. and Holmes, W. 1972. The influence of supplements of energy and protein on the intake and performance of cattle fed on cereal straws. Anim. Prod. 15: 167176.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Wilson, R. S. 1963. The assessment of a crop husbandry technique n i terms of animal production. Anim. Prod. 5: 2742.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Murdoch, J. C. 1966. The effect of concentrates on the voluntary intake of roughages by cows. J. Dairy Res. 33: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar