Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:00:59.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the effects of previous photoperiod exposure and gradual transitions of light intensity at dawn and dusk on growth in Holstein heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. A. Zinn
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
L. T. Chapin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
H. A. Tucker
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
Get access

Extract

Long-day photoperiods of 16 h light (L) and 8 h dark (D) stimulate a proportional increase in live-weight (LW) gain of peripubertal Holstein heifers of 0·08 to 0·17 compared with heifers exposed to short days of less than 12 h L per day (Peters, Chapin, Leining and Tucker, 1978; Peters, Chapin, Emery and Tucker, 1980; Petitclerc, Chapin, Emery and Tucker, 1983; Zinn, Chapin and Tucker, 1986). One factor that could account for some of this variation in the magnitude of the growth response to long days is that the previous photoperiod exposure may influence the response to a subsequent different photoperiod (Moore-Ede, Sulzman and Fuller, 1982). For example, exposure to 13L: 11D induced pulsatile activity of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) in ewes previously exposed to 16L: 8D, but reduced serum LH to undetectable levels in sheep previously exposed to 8L: 16D (Robinson and Karsch, 1987). Thus, sheep exposed to identical photoperiods exhibited different responses depending on previous photoperiod exposure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gill, J. L. 1986. Repeated measurement: sensitive tests for experiments with few animals. Journal of Animal Science 63: 943954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, J. L. and Hafs, H. D. 1971. Analysis of repeated measurements of animals. Journal of Animal Science 33: 331336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, K., Illnerova, H. and Vanfcek, J. 1986. Change in duration of the nighttime melatonin peak may be a signal driving photoperiodic responses in the Djungarian hamster (Phodopus sungorus). Neuroscience Letters 67: 6872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavanau, J. L. 1962. Twilight transitions and biological rhythmicity. Nature, London 194: 12931295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore-Ede, M. G., Sulzman, F. M. and Fuller, C. A. 1982. Characteristics of circadian clocks. In The Clocks That Time Us, pp. 4345. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Peters, R. R., Chapin, L. T., Emery, R. S. and Tucker, H. A. 1980. Growth and hormonal response of heifers to various photoperiods. Journal of Animal Science 51: 11481153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, R. R., Chapin, L. T., Leining, K. B. and Tucker, H. A. 1978. Supplemental lighting stimulates growth and lactation in cattle. Science, Washington 199: 911912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petitclerc, D., Chapin, L. T., Emery, R. S. and Tucker, H. A. 1983. Body growth, growth hormone, prolactin and puberty response to photoperiod and plane of nutrition in Holstein heifers. Journal of Animal Science 57: 892898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiter, R. J. 1987. The melatonin message: duration versus coincidence hypothesis. Life Sciences 40: 21192131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. E. and Karsch, F. J. 1987. Photoperiodic history and a changing melatonin pattern can determine the neuroendocrine response of the ewe to daylength. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 80: 159165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinn, S. A., Chapin, L. T. and Tucker, H. A. 1986. Response of body weight and clearance and secretion rates of growth hormone to photoperiod in Holstein heifers. Journal of Animal Science 62: 12731278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed