Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:24:55.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the effect of limestone supplementation on the performance of cattle given barley-based diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Jean M. Bass ,
G. Fishwick  and
J. J. Parkins
Jean M. Bass
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH
G. Fishwick
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH
J. J. Parkins
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH
Get access

Abstract

Groups of Hereford-cross steers weighing 283 kg were given 0·6 kg dry matter hay per head per day, and bruised barley supplemented with 40 g of a fully soluble liquid product per kg, containing urea, minerals and vitamins, ad libitum. Half the animals received 10 g limestone per kg diet as an additional supplement. Over a 105-day period the food intake of the limestone-supplemented animals was 0·20 higher than that of unsupplemented animals. The resultant daily live-weight gain was 1·22 kg compared with 0·92 kg for the animals receiving the diet containing no additional limestone. Food conversion ratios (kg/kg live-weight gain) were improved by limestone supplementation from 6·84 to 6·19. Limestone inclusion did not appear to influence the low concentrations of starch (ca. 15 g/kg) present in the faecal dry matter but there was a small significant difference in faecal pH.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , June 1982 , pp. 351 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Fiske, H. H. and Subbarow, Y. 1925. The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J. biol. Chem. 66: 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herod, E. L., Bechtle, R. M. and Bartley, E. E. 1977. Effect in vitro of combinations of buffer compounds on changes in rumen fluid pH. J. Dairy Sci. 60: Suppl. 1, p. 118 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
McManus, W. R., Bigham, M. L. and Edwards, G. B. 1972. Whole wheat grain feeding of lambs. I. Production responses to mineral buffer supplements. Aust. J. agric. Res. 23: 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, W. E. and Noller, C. H. 1976. Limestone buffers in complete mixed rations for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 59: 1788–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, W. E. and Oltjen, R. R. 1979. Cement kiln dust in complete diets for finishing steers and growing lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 658–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar